Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 167 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 106 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 187 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 443 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

BrainMorph: A Foundational Keypoint Model for Robust and Flexible Brain MRI Registration (2405.14019v3)

Published 22 May 2024 in cs.CV

Abstract: We present a keypoint-based foundation model for general purpose brain MRI registration, based on the recently-proposed KeyMorph framework. Our model, called BrainMorph, serves as a tool that supports multi-modal, pairwise, and scalable groupwise registration. BrainMorph is trained on a massive dataset of over 100,000 3D volumes, skull-stripped and non-skull-stripped, from nearly 16,000 unique healthy and diseased subjects. BrainMorph is robust to large misalignments, interpretable via interrogating automatically-extracted keypoints, and enables rapid and controllable generation of many plausible transformations with different alignment types and different degrees of nonlinearity at test-time. We demonstrate the superiority of BrainMorph in solving 3D rigid, affine, and nonlinear registration on a variety of multi-modal brain MRI scans of healthy and diseased subjects, in both the pairwise and groupwise setting. In particular, we show registration accuracy and speeds that surpass many classical and learning-based methods, especially in the context of large initial misalignments and large group settings. All code and models are available at https://github.com/alanqrwang/brainmorph.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (98)
  1. The medical segmentation decathlon. Nature Communications 13, 4128.
  2. Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Medical image analysis 12, 26–41.
  3. Advanced normalization tools (ants). Insight j 2, 1–35.
  4. Voxelmorph: A learning framework for deformable medical image registration. IEEE TMI 38, 1788–1800.
  5. Key. net: Keypoint detection by handcrafted and learned cnn filters, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 5836–5844.
  6. Surf: Speeded up robust features, in: European conference on computer vision, Springer. pp. 404–417.
  7. A learning strategy for contrast-agnostic mri segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.01995 .
  8. Synthseg: Segmentation of brain MRI scans of any contrast and resolution without retraining. Medical Image Analysis 86, 102789.
  9. Se(3)-equivariant and noise-invariant 3d motion tracking in medical images. arXiv:2312.13534.
  10. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11, 567--585.
  11. Multi-image matching using multi-scale oriented patches, in: 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05), IEEE. pp. 510--517.
  12. Deformable image registration using a cue-aware deep regression network. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 65, 1900--1911.
  13. Vit-v-net: Vision transformer for unsupervised volumetric medical image registration. ArXiv abs/2104.06468.
  14. A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 89, 114--141.
  15. Objective evaluation of multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation using a data management and processing infrastructure. Scientific Reports 8, 13650.
  16. Unsupervised learning of probabilistic diffeomorphic registration for images and surfaces. Medical image analysis 57, 226--236.
  17. Superpoint: Self-supervised interest point detection and description, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pp. 224--236.
  18. Approximate thin plate spline mappings, in: Heyden, A., Sparr, G., Nielsen, M., Johansen, P. (Eds.), Computer Vision --- ECCV 2002, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 21--31.
  19. Flownet: Learning optical flow with convolutional networks, in: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp. 2758--2766.
  20. Pulmonary ct registration through supervised learning with convolutional neural networks. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 38, 1097--1105.
  21. Adversarial similarity network for evaluating image alignment in deep learning based registration, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer. pp. 739--746.
  22. Birnet: Brain image registration using dual-supervised fully convolutional networks. Medical image analysis 54, 193--206.
  23. Editorial: Predicting chronological age from structural neuroimaging: The predictive analytics competition 2019. Frontiers in Psychiatry 12.
  24. Freesurfer. NeuroImage 62, 774--781.
  25. A fast operator for detection and precise location of distinct points, corners and centres of circular features, in: Proc. ISPRS intercommission conference on fast processing of photogrammetric data, Interlaken. pp. 281--305.
  26. Fifteen years of the australian imaging, biomarkers and lifestyle (aibl) study: Progress and observations from 2,359 older adults spanning the spectrum from cognitive normality to alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease Reports 5, 443--468. PMID: 34368630; PMCID: PMC8293663.
  27. Magnetic resonance imaging of the newborn brain: manual segmentation of labelled atlases in term-born and preterm infants. Neuroimage 62, 1499--1509. Epub 2012 Jun 17. PMID: 22713673.
  28. Deep learning enables automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases on multisequence mri. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 51, 175--182. Epub 2019 May 2. PMID: 31050074; PMCID: PMC7199496.
  29. Groupwise image registration based on a total correlation dissimilarity measure for quantitative mri and dynamic imaging data. Scientific Reports 8.
  30. A combined corner and edge detector., in: Alvey vision conference, Citeseer. pp. 10--5244.
  31. Mind: Modality independent neighbourhood descriptor for multi-modal deformable registration. Medical image analysis 16, 1423--1435.
  32. Variational methods for multimodal image matching. International Journal of Computer Vision 50, 329--343.
  33. Isles 2022: A multi-center magnetic resonance imaging stroke lesion segmentation dataset. Scientific Data 9, 762.
  34. Medical image registration. Physics in medicine & biology 46, R1.
  35. Synthmorph: learning contrast-invariant registration without acquired images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 41, 543--558.
  36. SynthMorph: Learning contrast-invariant registration without acquired images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 41, 543--558.
  37. Hypermorph: Amortized hyperparameter learning for image registration. IPMI .
  38. Label-driven weakly-supervised learning for multimodal deformable image registration, in: 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018), IEEE. pp. 1070--1074.
  39. Weakly-supervised convolutional neural networks for multimodal image registration. Medical image analysis 49, 1--13.
  40. Automated brain extraction of multisequence mri using artificial neural networks. Human Brain Mapping 40, 4952--4964.
  41. The brain tumor segmentation (brats) challenge 2023: Focus on pediatrics (cbtn-connect-dipgr-asnr-miccai brats-peds). arXiv:2305.17033.
  42. Transformers in vision: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54, 1 -- 41.
  43. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 arXiv:1412.6980.
  44. Learning a probabilistic model for diffeomorphic registration. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 38, 2165--2176.
  45. Standardized assessment of automatic segmentation of white matter hyperintensities and results of the wmh segmentation challenge. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 38, 2556--2568. Epub 2019 Mar 19. PMID: 30908194; PMCID: PMC7590957.
  46. Oasis-3: Longitudinal neuroimaging, clinical, and cognitive dataset for normal aging and alzheimer disease. medRxiv .
  47. Image-and-spatial transformer networks for structure-guided image registration, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer. pp. 337--345.
  48. Image-and-spatial transformer networks for structure-guided image registration. arXiv:1907.09200.
  49. Learning covariant feature detectors, in: European conference on computer vision, Springer. pp. 100--117.
  50. Same: Deformable image registration based on self-supervised anatomical embeddings. arXiv:2109.11572.
  51. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International journal of computer vision 60, 91--110.
  52. Image matching from handcrafted to deep features: A survey. International Journal of Computer Vision 129, 23--79.
  53. Symmetric transformer-based network for unsupervised image registration. Knowl. Based Syst. 257, 109959.
  54. Volumetric landmark detection with a multi-scale shift equivariant neural network. International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) , 981--985.
  55. Shifts 2.0: Extending the dataset of real distributional shifts. arXiv:2206.15407.
  56. Open Access Series of Imaging Studies: Longitudinal MRI Data in Nondemented and Demented Older Adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22, 2677--2684.
  57. Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS): Cross-sectional MRI Data in Young, Middle Aged, Nondemented, and Demented Older Adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19, 1498--1507.
  58. The parkinson progression marker initiative (ppmi). Progress in Neurobiology 95, 629--635. Biological Markers for Neurodegenerative Diseases.
  59. Robust wide-baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions. Image and vision computing 22, 761--767.
  60. Pet-ct image registration in the chest using free-form deformations. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 22, 120--128.
  61. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (brats). IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 34, 1993--2024.
  62. Differential invariants for color images, in: Proceedings. Fourteenth International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Cat. No. 98EX170), IEEE. pp. 838--840.
  63. Equivariant filters for efficient tracking in 3d imaging, in: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention--MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27--October 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part IV 24, Springer. pp. 193--202.
  64. Brain mri dataset of multiple sclerosis with consensus manual lesion segmentation and patient meta information. Data Brief 42, 108139.
  65. itk-elastix: Medical image registration in Python, in: Meghann Agarwal, Chris Calloway, Dillon Niederhut (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Python in Science Conference, pp. 101 -- 105.
  66. Medical image registration: a review. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering 17, 73--93.
  67. Lf-net: Learning local features from images. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.09662 .
  68. Simulation of brain resection for cavity segmentation using self-supervised and semi-supervised learning, in: Martel, A.L., Abolmaesumi, P., Stoyanov, D., Mateus, D., Zuluaga, M.A., Zhou, S.K., Racoceanu, D., Joskowicz, L. (Eds.), Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention -- MICCAI 2020, Springer International Publishing, Cham. pp. 115--125.
  69. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (adni): clinical characterization. Neurology 74, 201--209. Epub 2009 Dec 30. PMID: 20042704; PMCID: PMC2809036.
  70. Unsupervised deformable registration for multi-modal images via disentangled representations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Information Processing in Medical Imaging , 249–261.
  71. Highly accurate inverse consistent registration: a robust approach. Neuroimage 53, 1181--1196. Epub 2010 Jul 14. PMID: 20637289; PMCID: PMC2946852.
  72. Landmark-based elastic registration using approximating thin-plate splines. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 20, 526--534.
  73. Edge and curve detection for visual scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on computers 100, 562--569.
  74. Longitudinal assessment of posttreatment diffuse glioma tissue volumes with three-dimensional convolutional neural networks. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence 4, e210243.
  75. The university of california san francisco brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery (ucsf-bmsr) mri dataset. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence 6, e230126.
  76. Fully convolutional regression network for accurate detection of measurement points, in: Deep learning in medical image analysis and multimodal learning for clinical decision support. Springer, pp. 258--266.
  77. Cross-modal attention for multi-modal image registration. Medical Image Analysis 82, 102612.
  78. Deformable medical image registration: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 32, 1153--1190.
  79. Hd2reg: Hierarchical descriptors and detectors for point cloud registration. 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) , 1--6.
  80. Neural outlier rejection for self-supervised keypoint learning. ArXiv abs/1912.10615.
  81. Feature-based alignment of volumetric multi-modal images, in: International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Springer. pp. 25--36.
  82. Local invariant feature detectors: a survey. Now Publishers Inc.
  83. General overview on the merits of multimodal neuroimaging data fusion. Neuroimage 102, 3--10.
  84. Instance normalization: The missing ingredient for fast stylization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.08022 .
  85. Training cnns for image registration from few samples with model-based data augmentation, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer. pp. 223--231.
  86. Tilde: A temporally invariant learned detector, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 5279--5288.
  87. Algorithms for the weighted orthogonal procrustes problem and other least squares problems.
  88. Alignment by maximization of mutual information. International journal of computer vision 24, 137--154.
  89. A deep learning framework for unsupervised affine and deformable image registration. Medical image analysis 52, 128--143.
  90. Keypoint transfer for fast whole-body segmentation. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 39, 273--282.
  91. A robust and interpretable deep learning framework for multi-modal registration via keypoints. Medical Image Analysis 90, 102962.
  92. Boosting color saliency in image feature detection. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 28, 150--156.
  93. Scalable high-performance image registration framework by unsupervised deep feature representations learning. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 63, 1505--1516.
  94. Quicksilver: Fast predictive image registration--a deep learning approach. NeuroImage 158, 378--396.
  95. Lift: Learned invariant feature transform, in: European conference on computer vision, Springer. pp. 467--483.
  96. Learning to find good correspondences. arXiv:1711.05971.
  97. Keymorph: Robust multi-modal affine registration via unsupervised keypoint detection, in: Medical Imaging with Deep Learning.
  98. Two-step registration on multi-modal retinal images via deep neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 31, 823--838.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper presents BrainMorph, a novel keypoint-based foundation model offering robust and interpretable 3D brain MRI registration across various tasks.
  • BrainMorph demonstrates versatility across rigid, affine, and nonlinear transformations for both pairwise and efficient groupwise registration, improving scalability.
  • Trained on an extensive, diverse dataset, the model outperforms state-of-the-art methods, particularly under large misalignments, ensuring strong generalization.

BrainMorph: A Keypoint-Based Model for Robust Brain MRI Registration

The paper "BrainMorph: A Foundational Keypoint Model for Robust and Flexible Brain MRI Registration" presents a novel approach to brain MRI registration through a keypoint-based foundation model named BrainMorph. This model addresses various complexities in MRI registration, such as multi-modal, pairwise, and groupwise settings, by utilizing the previously proposed KeyMorph framework. The model is trained on an expansive dataset of over 100,000 3D volumes, representing nearly 16,000 distinct subjects, both healthy and diseased, making it robust in its application to a wide range of misalignments and pathologies. BrainMorph's capabilities highlight its proficiency in 3D rigid, affine, and nonlinear registration, outperforming several state-of-the-art methods in terms of accuracy and speed, particularly under conditions of considerable initial misalignments and large data group settings.

Key Contributions and Findings

  1. Keypoint-Based Framework: BrainMorph leverages a novel keypoint-based framework, providing a marked advancement in robustness and interpretability over existing registration techniques. Unlike dense deformation models or iterative frameworks, the BrainMorph model utilizes a keypoint detection network to identify salient features automatically. This feature benefits users by offering a more transparent registration process where users can evaluate the keypoints that drive the registration process.
  2. Task Versatility: The model demonstrates versatile performance across different types of transformation tasks—rigid, affine, and nonlinear—simultaneously supporting both pairwise and groupwise registration. Such versatility is achieved by an adaptable training scheme that integrates various transformation types and objective loss functions.
  3. Scalability and Efficiency: Particularly noteworthy is the introduction of a novel groupwise registration strategy that efficiently computes the average space and transformation among multiple images using keypoints. This method enables BrainMorph to handle extensive datasets feasibly, achieving considerable computational efficiency improvements over current methods such as ITK-Elastix.
  4. Comprehensive Dataset: The extensive dataset used for BrainMorph's training ensures robustness across various MRI modalities and subject conditions (e.g., healthy, diseased, skull-stripped). This dataset diversity allows BrainMorph to generalize well to unseen data and perform effectively irrespective of preprocessing steps such as skull stripping, usually a requirement for other methods.
  5. Performance Metrics: In empirical evaluations, BrainMorph consistently surpassed existing baselines, particularly at large misalignment angles and demonstrated significant improvements in Dice scores and Hausdorff distances. Such quantitative metrics underline the model's superior alignment accuracy.

Implications and Future Directions

The development of BrainMorph represents a substantial stride in the field of medical image registration, offering a model that is not only robust and interpretable but also computationally efficient for real-world applications involving large, complex datasets. The introduction of keypoint-based registration methods marks a paradigm shift from traditional dense deformation models, focusing on leveraging keypoint correspondences to achieve accurate and scalable registrations.

The model’s adaptability to various MRI types and its non-reliance on intensive pre-processing make it an appealing option for widespread clinical application. Future research directions may explore further enhancing model robustness to outliers or noise in data, fine-tuning keypoint detection mechanisms, and extending these methods to non-MRI modalities or non-brain anatomical sites. Additionally, integrating such techniques with emerging technologies like augmenting AI with real-time data could further improve clinical diagnostics and treatment planning in neurology and radiology.

Overall, BrainMorph's contributions illustrate a promising trajectory towards more accessible and scalable solutions in medical image registration, with potential applications that extend beyond its current implementation.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 2 tweets and received 63 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: