Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Adaptive coupling of 3D and 2D fluid flow models

Published 21 May 2024 in physics.flu-dyn, cs.NA, and math.NA | (2405.13165v1)

Abstract: Similar to the notion of h-adaptivity, where the discretization resolution is adaptively changed, I propose the notion of model adaptivity, where the underlying model (the governing equations) is adaptively changed in space and time. Specifically, this work introduces a hybrid and adaptive coupling of a 3D bulk fluid flow model with a 2D thin film flow model. As a result, this work extends the applicability of existing thin film flow models to complex scenarios where, for example, bulk flow develops into thin films after striking a surface. At each location in space and time, the proposed framework automatically decides whether a 3D model or a 2D model must be applied. Using a meshless approach for both 3D and 2D models, at each particle, the decision to apply a 2D or 3D model is based on the user-prescribed resolution and a local principal component analysis. When a particle needs to be changed from a 3D model to 2D, or vice versa, the discretization is changed, and all relevant data mapping is done on-the-fly. Appropriate two-way coupling conditions and mass conservation considerations between the 3D and 2D models are also developed. Numerical results show that this model adaptive framework shows higher flexibility and compares well against finely resolved 3D simulations. In an actual application scenario, a 3 factor speed up is obtained, while maintaining the accuracy of the solution.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (51)
  1. Fast neighbor lists for adaptive-resolution particle simulations. Computer Physics Communications, 183(5):1073–1081, 2012.
  2. J. Behrens. Towards model-adaptivity: Localized non-hydrostatic wave modeling. In Geophysical Research Abstracts, volume 21, 2019.
  3. Influence of several factors in the generalized finite difference method. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 25(12):1039–1053, 2001.
  4. A. L. Bertozzi and M. Pugh. The lubrication approximation for thin viscous films: Regularity and long-time behavior of weak solutions. Communications on pure and applied mathematics, 49(2):85–123, 1996.
  5. A discrete droplet method for modelling thin film flows. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 112:486–504, 2022.
  6. A Lagrangian meshfree model for solidification of liquid thin-films. Computers & Fluids, page 106267, 2024.
  7. M. Braack and A. Ern. A posteriori control of modeling errors and discretization errors. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 1(2):221–238, 2003.
  8. Multiscale modeling of material failure: Theory and computational methods. Advances in applied mechanics, 52:1–103, 2019.
  9. Point cloud segmentation and denoising via constrained nonlinear least squares normal estimates. In M. Breuß, A. Bruckstein, and P. Maragos, editors, Innovations for Shape Analysis: Models and Algorithms, pages 283–299. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013.
  10. Extreme solitary waves on falling liquid films. Journal of fluid mechanics, 745:564–591, 2014.
  11. Manifold death: a volume of fluid implementation of controlled topological changes in thin sheets by the signature method. Journal of Computational Physics, 467:111468, 2022.
  12. A. J. Chorin. Numerical solution of the navier-stokes equations. Mathematics of computation, 22(104):745–762, 1968.
  13. Finite pointset method for simulation of the liquid - liquid flow field in an extractor. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 32(12):2946 – 2957, 2008.
  14. T.-P. Fries. Higher-order surface fem for incompressible navier-stokes flows on manifolds. International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 88(2):55–78, 2018.
  15. Surface reconstruction from unorganized points. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph., 26(2):71–78, July 1992.
  16. Smart cloud collocation: geometry-aware adaptivity directly from CAD. Computer-Aided Design, 154:103409, 2023.
  17. Taylor-series expansion based numerical methods: a primer, performance benchmarking and new approaches for problems with non-smooth solutions. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 27:1465–1513, 2020.
  18. J. Liang and H. Zhao. Solving partial differential equations on point clouds. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 35(3):A1461–A1486, 2013.
  19. A two-way coupling 2D-3D hybrid finite element numerical model using overlapping method for tsunami simulation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 95(11):1732–1755, 2023.
  20. High-accuracy three-dimensional surface detection in smoothed particle hydrodynamics for free-surface flows. Computer Physics Communications, 290:108789, 2023.
  21. R. Löhner and E. Onate. An advancing front point generation technique. Communications in numerical methods in engineering, 14(12):1097–1108, 1998.
  22. A local search scheme in the natural element method for the analysis of elastic-plastic problems. Advances in Engineering Software, 176:103403, 2023.
  23. A finite pointset method for the numerical simulation of free surface flow around a ship. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 21:190–202, 2016.
  24. S. Marras and K. T. Mandli. Modeling and simulation of tsunami impact: a short review of recent advances and future challenges. Geosciences, 11(1):5, 2020.
  25. Physics-agnostic and physics-infused machine learning for thin films flows: modelling, and predictions from small data. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 975:A41, 2023.
  26. A Lagrangian–Eulerian procedure for the coupled solution of the Navier–Stokes and shallow water equations for landslide-generated waves. Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, 9(1):15, 2022.
  27. Parallel coupling numerics for partitioned fluid–structure interaction simulations. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 71(4):869–891, 2016.
  28. A meshfree generalized finite difference method for solution mining processes. Computational Particle Mechanics, 8(3):561–574, 2021.
  29. F. Mintgen and M. Manhart. A bi-directional coupling of 2D shallow water and 3D Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes models. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 56(6):771–785, 2018.
  30. J. Onderik and R. Durikovic. Efficient neighbor search for particle-based fluids. Journal of the Applied Mathematics, Statistics and Informatics, 4(1):29–43, 2008.
  31. Variable passing method for combining 3D MPM–FEM hybrid and 2D shallow water simulations of landslide-induced tsunamis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 96(1):17–43, 2024.
  32. MPM–FEM hybrid method for granular mass–water interaction problems. Computational Mechanics, 68(1):155–173, 2021.
  33. X. Rao. An upwind generalized finite difference method (gfdm) for meshless analysis of heat and mass transfer in porous media. Computational Particle Mechanics, 10(3):533–554, 2023.
  34. Wavemaker: The three-dimensional wave simulation tool for falling liquid films. SoftwareX, 7:211–216, 2018.
  35. Three-dimensional flow prediction in mould filling processes using a GFDM. Computational Particle Mechanics, 6(3):411–425, 2019.
  36. B. Seibold. M-Matrices in Meshless Finite Difference Methods. PhD thesis, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany, 2006.
  37. J. Shlens. A tutorial on principal component analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.1100, 2014.
  38. J. Slak and G. Kosec. On generation of node distributions for meshless pde discretizations. SIAM journal on scientific computing, 41(5):A3202–A3229, 2019.
  39. Point cloud generation for meshfree methods: An overview. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 30(2):889–915, 2023.
  40. P. Suchde and J. Kuhnert. Point cloud movement for fully Lagrangian meshfree methods. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 340:89–100, 2018.
  41. P. Suchde and J. Kuhnert. A fully lagrangian meshfree framework for pdes on evolving surfaces. Journal of Computational Physics, 395:38–59, 2019.
  42. P. Suchde and J. Kuhnert. A meshfree generalized finite difference method for surface PDEs. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 78(8):2789–2805, 2019.
  43. A flux conserving meshfree method for conservation laws. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 112(3):238–256, 2017.
  44. On meshfree GFDM solvers for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Computers & Fluids, 165:1–12, 2018.
  45. Volume and mass conservation in lagrangian meshfree methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13410, 2023.
  46. Molecular dynamics/XFEM coupling by a three-dimensional extended bridging domain with applications to dynamic brittle fracture. International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, 11(6), 2013.
  47. S. Tiwari and J. Kuhnert. Particle method for simulation of free surface flows. In Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Hyperbolic Problems held in CalTech, Pasadena, March 25–29, 2002, pages 889–898. Springer, 2003.
  48. C. B. Vreugdenhil. Numerical methods for shallow-water flow, volume 13. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
  49. 3d large-scale sph modeling of vehicle wading with gpu acceleration. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 66(10):104711, 2023.
  50. Z. Zheng and X. Li. Theoretical analysis of the generalized finite difference method. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 120:1–14, 2022.
  51. O. C. Zienkiewicz. The background of error estimation and adaptivity in finite element computations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195(4-6):207–213, 2006.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.