Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Improved classical shadows from local symmetries in the Schur basis (2405.09525v1)

Published 15 May 2024 in quant-ph, cs.DS, cs.IT, cs.LG, and math.IT

Abstract: We study the sample complexity of the classical shadows task: what is the fewest number of copies of an unknown state you need to measure to predict expected values with respect to some class of observables? Large joint measurements are likely required in order to minimize sample complexity, but previous joint measurement protocols only work when the unknown state is pure. We present the first joint measurement protocol for classical shadows whose sample complexity scales with the rank of the unknown state. In particular we prove $\mathcal O(\sqrt{rB}/\epsilon2)$ samples suffice, where $r$ is the rank of the state, $B$ is a bound on the squared Frobenius norm of the observables, and $\epsilon$ is the target accuracy. In the low-rank regime, this is a nearly quadratic advantage over traditional approaches that use single-copy measurements. We present several intermediate results that may be of independent interest: a solution to a new formulation of classical shadows that captures functions of non-identical input states; a generalization of a ``nice'' Schur basis used for optimal qubit purification and quantum majority vote; and a measurement strategy that allows us to use local symmetries in the Schur basis to avoid intractable Weingarten calculations in the analysis.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. Scott Aaronson. Shadow tomography of quantum states. In Proceedings of the 50th annual ACM SIGACT symposium on theory of computing, pages 325–338, 2018.
  2. Quantum majority vote. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11729, 2022.
  3. Improved quantum data analysis. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 1398–1411, 2021.
  4. Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memory. In 2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 574–585. IEEE, 2022.
  5. Optimal purification of single qubits. Physical review letters, 82(21):4344, 1999.
  6. Weak fourier-schur sampling, the hidden subgroup problem, and the quantum collision problem. In Wolfgang Thomas and Pascal Weil, editors, STACS 2007, pages 598–609, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  7. Introduction to representation theory, volume 59. American Mathematical Soc., 2011.
  8. Representation theory: a first course, volume 129. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
  9. Sample-optimal classical shadows for pure states. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11810, 2022.
  10. Aram W Harrow. Applications of coherent classical communication and the schur transform to quantum information theory. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005.
  11. Aram W Harrow. The church of the symmetric subspace. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.6595, 2013.
  12. Masahito Hayashi. Asymptotic estimation theory for a finite-dimensional pure state model. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 31(20):4633, 1998.
  13. Sample-optimal tomography of quantum states. In Proceedings of the forty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 913–925, 2016.
  14. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nature Physics, 16(10):1050–1057, 2020.
  15. Alexander S Holevo. Probabilistic and statistical aspects of quantum theory, volume 1. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
  16. The rate of optimal purification procedures. In Annales Henri Poincare, volume 2, pages 1–26. Springer, 2001.
  17. Quantum spectrum testing. In Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’15, page 529–538, New York, NY, USA, 2015. Association for Computing Machinery.
  18. Efficient quantum tomography. In Proceedings of the forty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 899–912, 2016.
  19. Chaos and complexity by design. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017(4):1–64, 2017.
  20. Andrew J Scott. Tight informationally complete quantum measurements. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 39(43):13507, 2006.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com