Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Sample-optimal classical shadows for pure states (2211.11810v2)

Published 21 Nov 2022 in quant-ph, cs.IT, cs.LG, and math.IT

Abstract: We consider the classical shadows task for pure states in the setting of both joint and independent measurements. The task is to measure few copies of an unknown pure state $\rho$ in order to learn a classical description which suffices to later estimate expectation values of observables. Specifically, the goal is to approximate $\mathrm{Tr}(O \rho)$ for any Hermitian observable $O$ to within additive error $\epsilon$ provided $\mathrm{Tr}(O2)\leq B$ and $\lVert O \rVert = 1$. Our main result applies to the joint measurement setting, where we show $\tilde{\Theta}(\sqrt{B}\epsilon{-1} + \epsilon{-2})$ samples of $\rho$ are necessary and sufficient to succeed with high probability. The upper bound is a quadratic improvement on the previous best sample complexity known for this problem. For the lower bound, we see that the bottleneck is not how fast we can learn the state but rather how much any classical description of $\rho$ can be compressed for observable estimation. In the independent measurement setting, we show that $\mathcal O(\sqrt{Bd} \epsilon{-1} + \epsilon{-2})$ samples suffice. Notably, this implies that the random Clifford measurements algorithm of Huang, Kueng, and Preskill, which is sample-optimal for mixed states, is not optimal for pure states. Interestingly, our result also uses the same random Clifford measurements but employs a different estimator.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. “Sample-optimal tomography of quantum states”. In Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2016). Page 913–925. New York, NY, USA (2016). Association for Computing Machinery.
  2. “Efficient quantum tomography”. In Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2016). Page 899–912. New York, NY, USA (2016). Association for Computing Machinery.
  3. Scott Aaronson. “Shadow tomography of quantum states”. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2018). Page 325–338. New York, NY, USA (2018). Association for Computing Machinery.
  4. “Improved quantum data analysis”. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2021). Page 1398–1411. New York, NY, USA (2021). Association for Computing Machinery.
  5. “Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memory”. In 2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2022). Pages 574–585. Los Alamitos, CA, USA (2022).
  6. “Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements”. Nature Physics 16, 1050–1057 (2020).
  7. “A compressed classical description of quantum states”. In 14th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2019). Volume 135 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 8:1–8:9. Dagstuhl, Germany (2019). Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik.
  8. A J Scott. “Tight informationally complete quantum measurements”. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 39, 13507 (2006).
  9. “A partial derandomization of PhaseLift using spherical designs”. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications 21, 229–266 (2015).
  10. “Chaos and complexity by design”. Journal of High Energy Physics 2017, 121 (2017).
  11. G. Lugosi and S. Mendelson. “Mean estimation and regression under heavy-tailed distributions: A survey”. Found. Comp. Math. 19, 1145–1190 (2019).
  12. M. Lerasle. “Lecture notes: Selected topics on robust statistical learning theory” (2019). arXiv:1908.10761.
  13. Bela Bajnok. “Construction of spherical t𝑡titalic_t-designs”. Geometriae Dedicata 43, 167–179 (1992).
  14. “Reexamination of optimal quantum state estimation of pure states”. Phys. Rev. A 72, 032325 (2005).
  15. “Optimal asymptotic bounds for spherical designs”. Annals of Mathematics 178, 443–452 (2013).
  16. “Quantum computation and quantum information”. Cambridge University Press.  (2010).
  17. Zak Webb. “The Clifford group forms a unitary 3-design”. Quantum Information and Computation 16, 1379–1400 (2016).
  18. Huangjun Zhu. “Multiqubit Clifford groups are unitary 3-designs”. Physical Review A96 (2017).
  19. “Qubit stabilizer states are complex projective 3-designs” (2015). arXiv:1510.02767.
  20. “The Clifford group fails gracefully to be a unitary 4-design” (2016). arXiv:1609.08172.
  21. “Exponential separations for one-way quantum communication complexity, with applications to cryptography”. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2007). Pages 516–525. New York, NY, USA (2007). Association for Computing Machinery.
  22. Carl W. Helstrom. “Quantum detection and estimation theory”. Journal of Statistical Physics 1, 231–252 (1969).
  23. “Cryptographic distinguishability measures for quantum-mechanical states”. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 45, 1216–1227 (1999).
  24. Andrew Chi-Chin Yao. “Probabilistic computations: Toward a unified measure of complexity”. In 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (SFCS 1977). Pages 222–227. IEEE (1977).
  25. “The communication complexity of correlation”. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 56, 438–449 (2010).
  26. Alexander Semenovich Holevo. “Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum communication channel”. Problemy Peredachi Informatsii 9, 3–11 (1973). url: http://mi.mathnet.ru/ppi903.
  27. “Shallow shadows: Expectation estimation using low-depth random Clifford circuits” (2022). arXiv:2209.12924.
  28. “Scalable and flexible classical shadow tomography with tensor networks”. Quantum 7, 1026 (2023).
Citations (19)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com