Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 147 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 59 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 190 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 446 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Advanced surrogate model for electron-scale turbulence in tokamak pedestals (2405.09474v2)

Published 15 May 2024 in physics.plasm-ph and physics.comp-ph

Abstract: We derive an advanced surrogate model for predicting turbulent transport at the edge of tokamaks driven by electron temperature gradient (ETG) modes.Our derivation is based on a recently developed sensitivity-driven sparse grid interpolation approach for uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis at scale, which informs the set of parameters that define the surrogate model as a scaling law.Our model reveals that ETG-driven electron heat flux is influenced by the safety factor $q$, electron beta $\beta_e$, and normalized electron Debye length $\lambda_D$, in addition to well-established parameters such as the electron temperature and density gradients. To assess the trustworthiness of our model's predictions beyond training, we compute prediction intervals using bootstrapping. The surrogate model's predictive power is tested across a wide range of parameter values, including within-distribution testing parameters (to verify our model) as well as out-of-bounds and out-of-distribution testing (to validate the proposed model). Overall, validation efforts show that our model competes well with, or can even outperform, existing scaling laws in predicting ETG-driven transport.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. Spectral transition of multiscale turbulence in the tokamak pedestal. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 65(2):024001, dec 2022.
  2. Flow-shear destabilization of multiscale electron turbulence. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 66(4):045019, mar 2024.
  3. J. Candy. A unified method for operator evaluation in local Grad–Shafranov plasma equilibria. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 51(10):105009, sep 2009.
  4. The role of ETG modes in JET–ILW pedestals with varying levels of power and fuelling. Nuclear Fusion, 62(8):086028, jun 2022.
  5. Electron Temperature Gradient Turbulence. Physical Review Letters, 85:5579–5582, Dec 2000.
  6. B. Efron and R. Tibshirani. Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy. Statistical Science, 1(1):54 – 75, 1986.
  7. A general framework for quantifying uncertainty at scale. Communications Engineering, 1(1):43, 2022.
  8. Testing predictions of electron scale turbulent pedestal transport in two DIII-D ELMy H-modes. Nuclear Fusion, 61(5):056005, apr 2021.
  9. Identifying the microtearing modes in the pedestal of DIII-D H-modes using gyrokinetic simulations. Nuclear Fusion, 62(2):026008, dec 2021.
  10. Modeling electron temperature profiles in the pedestal with simple formulas for ETG transport. Nuclear Fusion, 64(6):066007, apr 2024.
  11. A gyrokinetic perspective on the JET-ILW pedestal. Nuclear Fusion, 57(3):036020, jan 2017.
  12. Gyrokinetic study of ASDEX Upgrade inter-ELM pedestal profile evolution. Nuclear Fusion, 55(6):063028, may 2015.
  13. Reduced models for ETG transport in the tokamak pedestal. Physics of Plasmas, 29(6):062501, 2022.
  14. Y. Idomura. Self-organization in electron temperature gradient driven turbulence. Physics of Plasmas, 13(8):080701, 08 2006.
  15. F. Jenko and W. Dorland. Prediction of Significant Tokamak Turbulence at Electron Gyroradius Scales. Physical Review Letters, 89:225001, Nov 2002.
  16. Critical gradient formula for toroidal electron temperature gradient modes. Physics of Plasmas, 8(9):4096–4104, 09 2001.
  17. Electron temperature gradient driven turbulence. Physics of Plasmas, 7(5):1904–1910, 2000.
  18. Gyrokinetic turbulence under near-separatrix or nonaxisymmetric conditions. Physics of Plasmas, 16(5):055901, 03 2009.
  19. Complex structure of turbulence across the ASDEX Upgrade pedestal. Journal of Plasma Physics, 89(6):905890605, 2023.
  20. ETG turbulent transport in the Mega Ampere Spherical Tokamak (MAST) pedestal. Nuclear Fusion, 64(1):016040, dec 2023.
  21. Three-dimensional inhomogeneity of electron-temperature-gradient turbulence in the edge of tokamak plasmas. Nuclear Fusion, 62(8):086045, jul 2022.
  22. Toroidal and slab ETG instability dominance in the linear spectrum of JET-ILW pedestals. Nuclear Fusion, 60(12):126045, oct 2020.
  23. Gyrokinetic analysis of an argon-seeded EDA H-mode in ASDEX Upgrade. Journal of Plasma Physics, 88(3):905880315, 2022.
  24. Gyrokinetic microinstabilities in ASDEX Upgrade edge plasmas. Physics of Plasmas, 15(10):102306, 10 2008.
  25. L. N. Trefethen. Approximation Theory and Approximation Practice. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, USA, 2012.
  26. J. Walker and D. R. Hatch. ETG turbulence in a tokamak pedestal. Physics of Plasmas, 30(8):082307, 08 2023.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 1 like.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: