Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
120 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
3 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
55 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Dynamic Rate Splitting Grouping for Antifragile Responses to Wireless Network Disruptions (2405.08078v1)

Published 13 May 2024 in eess.SP

Abstract: The reliance on wireless network architectures for applications demanding high reliability and fault tolerance is growing. These architectures heavily depend on wireless channels, making them susceptible to impairments and blockages. Ensuring functionality, particularly for safety-critical applications, demands robust countermeasures at the physical layer. In response, this work proposes the utilization of a dynamic Rate Splitting (RS) grouping approach as a resilience mechanism during blockages. RS effectively manages interference within networks but faces challenges during outages and blockages, where system performance can deteriorate due to the lowest decoding rate dictating the common rate and increased interference from fewer available channel links. As a strategic countermeasure, RS is leveraged to mitigate the impact of blockages, maintaining system efficiency and performance amidst disruptions. In fact, the introduction of new RS groups enables the exploration of novel solutions to the resource allocation problem, potentially outperforming those adopted before the occurrence of a blockage. As it turns out, by employing the dynamic RS grouping, the network exhibits an antifragile recovery response, showcasing the network's ability to not only recover from disruptions but also surpass its initial performance.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (11)
  1. “Ericsson mobility report Nov. 2023,” Ericsson, Tech. Rep., Nov. 2023.
  2. S. R. Pokhrel, J. Ding, J. Park, O.-S. Park, and J. Choi, “Towards enabling critical mMTC: A review of URLLC within mMTC,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 131 796–131 813, 2020.
  3. M. Najarian and G. J. Lim, “Design and assessment methodology for system resilience metrics,” Risk Analysis, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1885–1898, 2019.
  4. R.-J. Reifert, S. Roth, A. A. Ahmad, and A. Sezgin, “Comeback kid: Resilience for mixed-critical wireless network resource management,” IEEE Trans. on Vehicu. Tech., vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 16 177–16 194, 2023.
  5. K. Weinberger, R.-J. Reifert, A. Sezgin, and E. Basar, “RIS-enhanced resilience in cell-free MIMO,” in WSA and SCC 2023, 2023.
  6. M. Lichtman, M. T. Vondal, T. C. Clancy, and J. H. Reed, “Antifragile communications,” IEEE Sys. Journ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 659–670, 2018.
  7. H. de Bruijn, A. Größler, and N. Videira, “Antifragility as a design criterion for modelling dynamic systems,” Sys. Resear. and Behav. Science, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 23–37.
  8. J. Derbyshire and G. Wright, “Preparing for the future: Development of an ‘antifragile’ methodology that complements scenario planning by omitting causation,” Tech. Forec. and Social Change, vol. 82, pp. 215–225, 2014.
  9. J. Johnson and A. V. Gheorghe, “Antifragility analysis and measurement framework for systems of systems,” Intern. Journ. of Disaster Risk Science, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 159–168, Dec 2013.
  10. S. Sivadevuni, F. Lotfi, B. Ahmad, K. Weinberger, and A. Sezgin, “Preparing for the inevitable: Preventing outages using resilient RIS-assisted JCAS,” in IEEE CAMSAP, 2023, pp. 241–245.
  11. K. Weinberger, A. A. Ahmad, A. Sezgin, and A. Zappone, “Synergistic benefits in IRS- and RS-enabled C-RAN with energy-efficient clustering,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., pp. 1–1, 2022.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com