Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

2023 update of the extraction of the CKM matrix elements (2405.08046v1)

Published 13 May 2024 in hep-ph, hep-ex, and hep-lat

Abstract: I discuss the extraction of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix elements under the Standard Model (SM) framework from a global fit combining observables that satisfy the double requirement of being precisely known both experimentally and theoretically. The analysis shown here relies on the CKMfitter package, consisting of a frequentist approach that employs the Range fit (Rfit) scheme to handle theoretical uncertainties.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. CP Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction. Prog. Theor. Phys., 49:652–657, 1973. doi:10.1143/PTP.49.652.
  2. Nicola Cabibbo. Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays. Phys. Rev. Lett., 10:531–533, 1963. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.531.
  3. Stephen Lars Olsen. The Curious Early History of CKM Matrix – miracles happen! 9 2023. arXiv:2309.06042.
  4. Eur. Phys. J., C41(1):1–131, 2005. arXiv:hep-ph/0406184, doi:10.1140/epjc/s2005-02169-1.
  5. J. Charles et al. Phys. Rev., D91(7):073007, 2015. arXiv:1501.05013, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.073007.
  6. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 67:97–127, 2017. arXiv:1702.08834, doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101916-123109.
  7. Wenbin Qian. Recent CKMfitter updates on global fits of the CKM matrix. PoS, CKM2021:074, 2023. doi:10.22323/1.411.0074.
  8. Luiz Vale Silva. Update of the extraction of the CKM matrix elements. In 10th International Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle, 12 2018. arXiv:1812.04396.
  9. 2000 CKM triangle analysis: A Critical review with updated experimental inputs and theoretical parameters. JHEP, 07:013, 2001. arXiv:hep-ph/0012308, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/07/013.
  10. Marcella Bona et al. New UTfit Analysis of the Unitarity Triangle in the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa scheme. Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. Nat., 34:37–57, 2023. arXiv:2212.03894, doi:10.1007/s12210-023-01137-5.
  11. Eur. Phys. J., C77(4):214, 2017. arXiv:1611.04768, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4767-z.
  12. Y. Aoki et al. FLAG Review 2021. Eur. Phys. J. C, 82(10):869, 2022. arXiv:2111.09849, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10536-1.
  13. Superallowed 0+→0+→superscript0superscript00^{+}\to 0^{+}0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → 0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT nuclear β𝛽\betaitalic_β decays: 2020 critical survey, with implications for Vud and CKM unitarity. Phys. Rev. C, 102(4):045501, 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.045501.
  14. A note on isospin violation in Pl2(gamma) decays. Phys. Lett. B, 700:7–10, 2011. arXiv:1102.0563, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.038.
  15. Improved Vcs determination using precise lattice QCD form factors for D→Kℓℓ\ellroman_ℓν𝜈\nuitalic_ν. Phys. Rev. D, 104(3):034505, 2021. arXiv:2104.09883, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.034505.
  16. Alexei Bazavov et al. D-meson semileptonic decays to pseudoscalars from four-flavor lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 107(9):094516, 2023. arXiv:2212.12648, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.094516.
  17. M. Ablikim et al. Updated measurement of the branching fraction of Ds+→τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ+ν𝜈\nuitalic_ντ𝜏\tauitalic_τ via τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ+→π𝜋\piitalic_π+ν𝜈\nuitalic_ν¯τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ. Phys. Rev. D, 108(9):092014, 2023. arXiv:2303.12600, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.092014.
  18. Yasmine Sara Amhis et al. Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ-lepton properties as of 2021. Phys. Rev. D, 107(5):052008, 2023. arXiv:2206.07501, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.052008.
  19. M. T. Prim et al. Measurement of Angular Coefficients of B¯→D∗⁢ℓ⁢ν¯ℓ→¯𝐵superscript𝐷ℓsubscript¯𝜈ℓ\bar{B}\to D^{*}\ell\bar{\nu}_{\ell}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℓ over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT: Implications for |Vc⁢b|subscript𝑉𝑐𝑏|V_{cb}|| italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | and Tests of Lepton Flavor Universality. 10 2023. arXiv:2310.20286.
  20. I. Adachi et al. Determination of —Vcb— using B¯0→D*+ℓℓ\ellroman_ℓ−--ν𝜈\nuitalic_ν¯ℓℓ\ellroman_ℓ decays with Belle II. Phys. Rev. D, 108(9):092013, 2023. arXiv:2310.01170, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.092013.
  21. A. Bazavov et al. Semileptonic form factors for B→D∗⁢ℓ⁢ν→𝐵superscript𝐷ℓ𝜈B\rightarrow D^{*}\ell\nuitalic_B → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℓ italic_ν at nonzero recoil from 2+1212+12 + 1-flavor lattice QCD: Fermilab Lattice and MILC Collaborations. Eur. Phys. J. C, 82(12):1141, 2022. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 83, 21 (2023)]. arXiv:2105.14019, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10984-9.
  22. Judd Harrison and Christine T. H. Davies. B→D∗→𝐵superscript𝐷B\rightarrow D^{*}italic_B → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT vector, axial-vector and tensor form factors for the full q2superscript𝑞2q^{2}italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT range from lattice QCD. 4 2023. arXiv:2304.03137.
  23. B→D*ℓℓ\ellroman_ℓν𝜈\nuitalic_νℓℓ\ellroman_ℓ semileptonic form factors from lattice QCD with Möbius domain-wall quarks. Phys. Rev. D, 109(7):074503, 2024. arXiv:2306.05657, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.074503.
  24. Three loop calculations and inclusive Vcb. Phys. Lett. B, 822:136679, 2021. arXiv:2107.00604, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136679.
  25. L. Cao et al. Measurements of Partial Branching Fractions of Inclusive B→Xu⁢ℓ+⁢νℓ→𝐵subscript𝑋𝑢superscriptℓsubscript𝜈ℓB\to X_{u}\,\ell^{+}\,\nu_{\ell}italic_B → italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Decays with Hadronic Tagging. Phys. Rev. D, 104(1):012008, 2021. arXiv:2102.00020, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.012008.
  26. Roel Aaij et al. Determination of the quark coupling strength |Vu⁢b|subscript𝑉𝑢𝑏|V_{ub}|| italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | using baryonic decays. Nature Phys., 11:743–747, 2015. arXiv:1504.01568, doi:10.1038/nphys3415.
  27. Roel Aaij et al. Measurement of |Vc⁢b|subscript𝑉𝑐𝑏|V_{cb}|| italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | with Bs0→Ds(∗)−⁢μ+⁢νμ→superscriptsubscript𝐵𝑠0superscriptsubscript𝐷𝑠limit-fromsuperscript𝜇subscript𝜈𝜇B_{s}^{0}\to D_{s}^{(*)-}\mu^{+}\nu_{\mu}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∗ ) - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT decays. Phys. Rev. D, 101(7):072004, 2020. arXiv:2001.03225, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.072004.
  28. M. Hohmann et al. Measurement of the Ratio of Partial Branching Fractions of Inclusive B¯→Xu⁢ℓ⁢ν¯→¯𝐵subscript𝑋𝑢ℓ¯𝜈\overline{B}\to X_{u}\ell\overline{\nu}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG → italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG to B¯→Xc⁢ℓ⁢ν¯→¯𝐵subscript𝑋𝑐ℓ¯𝜈\overline{B}\to X_{c}\ell\overline{\nu}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG → italic_X start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG and the Ratio of their Spectra with Hadronic Tagging. 11 2023. arXiv:2311.00458.
  29. Eur. Phys. J., C77(8):574, 2017. arXiv:1705.02981, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5126-9.
  30. F. Abudinén et al. Angular analysis of B+→ρ+⁢ρ0→superscript𝐵superscript𝜌superscript𝜌0B^{+}\to\rho^{+}\rho^{0}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT decays reconstructed in 2019, 2020, and 2021 Belle II data. 6 2022. arXiv:2206.12362.
  31. F. Abudinén et al. Measurement of Branching Fraction and Longitudinal Polarization in B0→ρ+⁢ρ−→superscript𝐵0superscript𝜌superscript𝜌B^{0}\to\rho^{+}\rho^{-}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Decays at Belle II. 8 2022. arXiv:2208.03554.
  32. F. Abudinén et al. Measurement of the branching fraction and CP asymmetry of B0→π𝜋\piitalic_π0π𝜋\piitalic_π0 decays using 198×106 BB¯ pairs in Belle II data. Phys. Rev. D, 107(11):112009, 2023. arXiv:2303.08354, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.112009.
  33. F. Abudinén et al. Measurement of the branching fractions and C⁢P𝐶𝑃CPitalic_C italic_P asymmetries of B+→π+⁢π0→superscript𝐵superscript𝜋superscript𝜋0B^{+}\rightarrow\pi^{+}\pi^{0}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and B+→K+⁢π0→superscript𝐵superscript𝐾superscript𝜋0B^{+}\rightarrow K^{+}\pi^{0}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT decays in 2019-2021 Belle II data. 9 2022. arXiv:2209.05154.
  34. New physics in B𝐵Bitalic_B meson mixing: future sensitivity and limitations. Phys. Rev. D, 102(5):056023, 2020. arXiv:2006.04824, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.056023.
  35. For the web interface of the CKMfitter package, see: http://ckmlive.in2p3.fr/  .
  36. R. L. Workman et al. Review of Particle Physics. PTEP, 2022:083C01, 2022. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097.
  37. Armen Tumasyan et al. Precision measurement of the W boson decay branching fractions in proton-proton collisions at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV. Phys. Rev. D, 105(7):072008, 2022. arXiv:2201.07861, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.072008.
  38. R. Aaij et al. First observation of the decay Bs0→K−⁢μ+⁢νμ→superscriptsubscript𝐵𝑠0superscript𝐾superscript𝜇subscript𝜈𝜇B_{s}^{0}\to K^{-}\mu^{+}\nu_{\mu}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Measurement of |Vu⁢b|/|Vc⁢b|subscript𝑉𝑢𝑏subscript𝑉𝑐𝑏|V_{ub}|/|V_{cb}|| italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | / | italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT |. Phys. Rev. Lett., 126(8):081804, 2021. arXiv:2012.05143, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.081804.
  39. R. Aaij et al. Precise determination of the Bs0superscriptsubscript𝐵s0B_{\mathrm{s}}^{0}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT–B¯s0superscriptsubscript¯𝐵s0\overline{B}_{\mathrm{s}}^{0}over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT oscillation frequency. Nature Phys., 18(1):1–5, 2022. arXiv:2104.04421, doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01394-x.
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now

Whiteboard

Paper to Video (Beta)

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Authors (1)

  1. Luiz Vale Silva

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 2 likes about this paper.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up for Free