Modeling and performance analysis of Implicit Electric Field Conjugation with two deformable mirrors applied to the Roman Coronagraph (2405.03899v1)
Abstract: High-order wavefront sensing and control (HOWFSC) is key to create a dark hole region within the coronagraphic image plane where high contrasts are achieved. The Roman Coronagraph is expected to perform its HOWFSC with a ground-in-the-loop scheme due to the computational complexity of the Electric Field Conjugation (EFC) algorithm. This scheme provides the flexibility to alter the HOWFSC algorithm for given science objectives. The baseline HOWFSC scheme involves running EFC while observing a bright star such as {\zeta} Puppis to create the initial dark hole followed by a slew to the science target. The new implicit EFC (iEFC) algorithm removes the optical diffraction model from the controller, making the final contrast independent of model accuracy. While previously demonstrated with a single DM, iEFC is extended to two deformable mirror systems in order to create annular dark holes. The algorithm is then applied to the Wide-Field-of-View Shaped Pupil Coronagraph (SPC-WFOV) mode designed for the Roman Space Telescope using end-to-end physical optics models. Initial monochromatic simulations demonstrate the efficacy of iEFC as well as the optimal choice of modes for the SPC-WFOV instrument. Further simulations with a 3.6% wavefront control bandpass and a broader 10% bandpass then demonstrate that iEFC can be used in broadband scenarios to achieve contrasts below 1E-8 with Roman. Finally, an EMCCD model is implemented to estimate calibration times and predict the controller's performance. Here, 1E-8 contrasts are achieved with a calibration time of about 6.8 hours assuming the reference star is {\zeta} Puppis. The results here indicate that iEFC can be a valid HOWFSC method that can mitigate the risk of model errors associated with space-borne coronagraphs, but to maximize iEFC performance, lengthy calibration times will be required to mitigate the noise accumulated during calibration.
- N. Woolf and J. R. Angel, “Astronomical searches for earth-like planets and signs of life,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 36(1), 507–537 (1998).
- Potier, A., Galicher, R., Baudoz, P., et al., “Increasing the raw contrast of VLT/SPHERE with the dark hole technique - I. Simulations and validation on the internal source,” A&A 638, A117 (2020).
- K. Ahn, O. Guyon, J. Lozi, et al., “Combining EFC with spatial LDFC for high-contrast imaging on Subaru/SCExAO,” Astronomy & Astrophysics 673, A29 (2023).
- M. C. Noecker, F. Zhao, R. Demers, et al., “Coronagraph instrument for WFIRST-AFTA,” Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 2, 011001 (2016).
- Pages: 26141.
- V. P. Bailey, E. Bendek, B. Monacelli, et al., “Nancy grace roman space telescope coronagraph instrument overview and status,” in Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets XI, G. J. Ruane, Ed., 12680, 126800T, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE (2023).
- A. Give’on, B. Kern, S. Shaklan, et al., “Broadband wavefront correction algorithm for high-contrast imaging systems,” in Astronomical Adaptive Optics Systems and Applications III, R. K. Tyson and M. Lloyd-Hart, Eds., 6691, 66910A, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE (2007).
- Potier, A., Baudoz, P., Galicher, R., et al., “Comparing focal plane wavefront control techniques: Numerical simulations and laboratory experiments,” A&A 635, A192 (2020).
- Haffert, S. Y., Males, J. R., Ahn, K., et al., “Implicit electric field conjugation: Data-driven focal plane control,” A&A 673, A28 (2023).
- K. Milani, E. Douglas, S. Haffert, et al., “Simulating the efficacy of the implicit-electric-field-conjugation algorithm for the Roman Coronagraph with noise,” in Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets XI, G. J. Ruane, Ed., 12680, 126800Z, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE (2023).
- H. Zhou, J. Krist, B.-J. Seo, et al., “Roman CGI testbed HOWFSC modeling and validation,” in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2020: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, M. Lystrup, M. D. Perrin, N. Batalha, et al., Eds., 11443, 114431W, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE (2020).
- E. Sidick, A. J. E. Riggs, G. Ruane, et al., “Fast linearized coronagraph optimizer (FALCO) II: optical model validation and time savings over other methods,” in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, M. Lystrup, H. A. MacEwen, G. G. Fazio, et al., Eds., 10698, 106984S, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE (2018).
- S. D. Will, T. D. Groff, and J. R. Fienup, “Jacobian-free coronagraphic wavefront control using nonlinear optimization,” Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 7(1), 019002 (2021).
- E. Sidick, B.-J. Seo, B. D. Kern, et al., “Optimizing the regularization in broadband wavefront control algorithm for WFIRST coronagraph,” in Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets VIII, S. Shaklan, Ed., 74, SPIE, (San Diego, United States) (2017).
- P. Baudoz, A. Boccaletti, J. Baudrand, et al., “The self-coherent camera: a new tool for planet detection,” Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 1(C200), 553–558 (2005).
- J. E. Krist, J. B. Steeves, B. D. Dube, et al., “End-to-end numerical modeling of the Roman Space Telescope coronagraph,” Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 9(4), 045002 (2023).
- S. F. Redmond, L. Pueyo, L. Pogorelyuk, et al., “Implementation of a broadband focal plane estimator for high-contrast dark zones,” in Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets X, S. B. Shaklan and G. J. Ruane, Eds., 11823, 118231Q, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE (2021).
- T. D. Groff and N. J. Kasdin, “Kalman filtering techniques for focal plane electric field estimation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 30, 128–139 (2013).
- E. H. Por, S. Y. Haffert, V. M. Radhakrishnan, et al., “High Contrast Imaging for Python (HCIPy): an open-source adaptive optics and coronagraph simulator,” in Adaptive Optics Systems VI, Proc. SPIE 10703 (2018).
- M. Perrin, J. Long, E. Douglas, et al., “Physical optics propagation in python,” (2017).
- R. Okuta, Y. Unno, D. Nishino, et al., “Cupy: A numpy-compatible library for nvidia gpu calculations,” in Proceedings of Workshop on Machine Learning Systems (LearningSys) in The Thirty-first Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), (2017).
- K. Milani, E. S. Douglas, and J. Ashcraft, “Updated simulation tools for Roman coronagraph PSFs,” in UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes and Instruments: Innovative Technologies and Concepts X, A. A. Barto, J. B. Breckinridge, and H. P. Stahl, Eds., 11819, 118190E, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE (2021).
- D. S. Marx, B.-J. Seo, E. Sidick, et al., “Electric field conjugation in the presence of model uncertainty,” in Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets VIII, S. Shaklan, Ed., 23, SPIE, (San Diego, United States) (2017).
- L. Pogorelyuk, C. Haughwout, N. Belsten, et al., “Computational complexities of image plane algorithms for high contrast imaging in space telescopes,” Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 8 (2022).
- H. Sun, N. J. Kasdin, and R. Vanderbei, “Identification and adaptive control of a high-contrast focal plane wavefront correction system,” Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 4, 1 (2018).
- J. Krist, “Roman cgi observing scenario 11 time series simulations (shaped pupil coronagraph wide field of view band 4),” (2022).
- e. a. The Astropy Collaboration, “Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy,” Astronomy & Astrophysics 558, A33 (2013).
- J. D. Hunter, “Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment,” Computing In Science & Engineering 9(3), 90–95 (2007).
- E. Jones, T. Oliphant, and P. Peterson, “SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python,” http://www. scipy. org/ (2001).
- P. Moritz, R. Nishihara, S. Wang, et al., “Ray: A Distributed Framework for Emerging AI Applications,” (2018). arXiv:1712.05889 [cs, stat].
- F. Pérez and B. Granger, “IPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Computing,” Computing in Science Engineering 9, 21–29 (2007).
- K. Milani, “kian1377/cgi_phasec_poppy: Roman Coronagraph Models in POPPY,” (2023).
- K. Milani, “kian1377/roman-cgi-iefc: Roman iefc v1.0.0,” (2023).
- Bouret, J.-C., Hillier, D. J., Lanz, T., et al., “Properties of galactic early-type o-supergiants - a combined fuv-uv and optical analysis,” A&A 544, A67 (2012).
- Schilbach, E. and Röser, S., “On the origin of field o-type stars,” A&A 489(1), 105–114 (2008).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.