Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Prediction of Performance and Turbulence in ITER Burning Plasmas via Nonlinear Gyrokinetic Profile Prediction (2404.17040v1)

Published 25 Apr 2024 in physics.plasm-ph

Abstract: Burning plasma performance, transport, and the effect of hydrogen isotope on confinement has been predicted for ITER baseline scenario (IBS) conditions using nonlinear gyrokinetic profile predictions. Accelerated by surrogate modeling [P. Rodriguez-Fernandez NF 2022], high fidelity, nonlinear gyrokinetic simulations performed with the CGYRO code [J. Candy JCP 2016], were used to predict profiles of Ti, Te, and ne while including the effects of alpha heating, auxiliary power, collisional energy exchange, and radiation losses. Predicted profiles and resulting energy confinement are found to produce fusion power and gain that are approximately consistent with mission goals (Pfusion = 500MW at Q=10) for the baseline scenario and exhibit energy confinement that is within 1 sigma of the H-mode energy confinement scaling. The power of the surrogate modeling technique is demonstrated through the prediction of alternative ITER scenarios with reduced computational cost. These scenarios include conditions with maximized fusion gain and an investigation of potential Resonant Magnetic Perturbation effects on performance with a minimal number of gyrokinetic profile iterations required. These predictions highlight the stiff ITG nature of the core turbulence predicted in the ITER baseline and demonstrate that Q>17 conditions may be accessible by reducing auxiliary input power while operating in IBS conditions. Prediction of full kinetic profiles allowed for the projection of hydrogen isotope effects around ITER baseline conditions. The gyrokinetic fuel ion species was varied from H, D, and 50/50 D-T and kinetic profiles were predicted. Results indicate that a weak or negligible isotope effect will be observed to arise from core turbulence in ITER baseline scenario conditions. The resulting energy confinement, turbulence, and density peaking, and the implications for ITER operations will be discussed.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. ITER Organization. Iter research plan within the stage approach (level iii - provisional version). ITER Technical Report, (ITR-18-003).
  2. Chapter 1: Overview and summary. Nuclear Fusion, 47(6):S1–S17, jun 2007.
  3. Multi-scale transport in the diii-d iter baseline scenario with direct electron heating and projection to iter. Physics of Plasmas, 25(2):022509, 2018.
  4. Fast transport simulations with higher-fidelity surrogate models for ITER. Physics of Plasmas, 30(6):062501, 06 2023.
  5. Development of compact tokamak fusion reactor use cases to inform future transport studies. Journal of Plasma Physics, 89(4):905890418, 2023.
  6. Optimising the iter 15ma dt baseline scenario by exploiting a self-consistent free-boundary core-edge-sol workflow in imas , iaea cn-258, ex/ p7-2. Proceeding of the 27th IAEA FEC, 2018.
  7. Progress and challenges in understanding core transport in tokamaks in support to iter operations. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 62(1):014021, dec 2019.
  8. A new gyrokinetic quasilinear transport model applied to particle transport in tokamak plasmas. Physics of Plasmas, 14(11):112501, 11 2007.
  9. The role of zonal flows in the saturation of multi-scale gyrokinetic turbulence. Submitted to Physics of Plasmas, 2016.
  10. A first-principles predictive model of the pedestal height and width: development, testing and iter optimization with the eped model. Nuclear Fusion, 51(10):103016, aug 2011.
  11. A high-accuracy eulerian gyrokinetic solver for collisional plasmas. Journal of Computational Physics, 324:73 – 93, 2016.
  12. Rapidly-convergent flux-surface shape parameterization. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 63(1):012001, nov 2020.
  13. Linearized model collision operators for multiple ion species plasmas and gyrokinetic entropy balance equations. Physics of Plasmas, 16(11):112503, 2009.
  14. Geometry dependence of the fluctuation intensity in gyrokinetic turbulence. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 63(1):015013, nov 2020.
  15. Multi-scale gyrokinetic simulation of tokamak plasmas: Enhanced heat loss due to cross-scale coupling of plasma turbulence. Nuclear Fusion, 58(1), 2016.
  16. Gyrokinetic simulation of turbulence and transport in the sparc tokamak. Submitted to Physics of Plasmas, 2021.
  17. Simultaneous reproduction of experimental profiles, fluxes, transport coefficients, and turbulence characteristics via nonlinear gyrokinetic profile predictions in a DIII-D ITER similar shape plasma. Physics of Plasmas, 31(3):032501, 03 2024.
  18. Gyrokinetic analysis and simulation of pedestals to identify the culprits for energy losses using ‘fingerprints’. Nuclear Fusion, 59(9):096001, 7 2019.
  19. Nonlinear gyrokinetic predictions of sparc burning plasma profiles enabled by surrogate modeling. Nuclear Fusion, 62(7):076036, may 2022.
  20. Enhancing predictive capabilities in fusion burning plasmas through surrogate-based optimization in core transport solvers. Submitted to Nuclear Fusion arXiv:2312.12610, 2024.
  21. E A Belli and J Candy. Kinetic calculation of neoclassical transport including self-consistent electron and impurity dynamics. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 50(9):095010, 2008.
  22. Tokamak profile prediction using direct gyrokinetic and neoclassical simulation. Physics of Plasmas, 16(6):060704, 2009.
  23. Direct multiscale coupling of a transport code to gyrokinetic turbulence codes. Physics of Plasmas, 17(5):056109, 2010.
  24. http://www.adas.ac.uk/.
  25. E.S. Marmar and Alcator C-Mod Group. The Alcator C-Mod program. Fusion Science and Technology, 51, (2007).
  26. Particle pinch and collisionality in gyrokinetic simulations of tokamak plasma turbulence. Physics of Plasmas, 16, (2009).
  27. Quantitative comparison of experimental impurity transport with nonlinear gyrokinetic simulation in an alcator c-mod l-mode plasma. Nuclear Fusion, 52(6):063002, 2012.
  28. The role of ion and electron-scale turbulence in setting heat and particle transport in the diii-d iter baseline scenario. Nuclear Fusion, 61(10):106002, aug 2021.
  29. Self-consistent core-pedestal transport simulations with neural network accelerated models. Nuclear Fusion, 57(8):086034, jul 2017.
  30. 3d vacuum magnetic field modelling of the iter elm control coil during standard operating scenarios. Nuclear Fusion, 53(9):093029, aug 2013.
  31. Rmp elm suppression in diii-d plasmas with iter similar shapes and collisionalities. Nuclear Fusion, 48(2):024002, jan 2008.
  32. Reversal of simple hydrogenic isotope scaling laws in tokamak edge turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:015001, Jun 2020.
  33. The isotope effect on core heat transport in jet-ilw ohmic plasmas in hydrogen, deuterium and tritium. Submitted to Nuclear Fusion, 2024.
  34. Chapter 2: Plasma confinement and transport. Nuclear Fusion, 39(12):2175, 1999.
  35. The updated itpa global h-mode confinement database: description and analysis. Nuclear Fusion, 61(7):076006, may 2021.
  36. Modelling and theoretical understanding of the isotope effect from jet experiments in view of reliable predictions for deuterium-tritium plasmas. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 64(5):054001, mar 2022.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Whiteboard

Paper to Video (Beta)

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.