Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 171 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 118 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 204 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 431 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Public Event Scheduling with Busy Agents (2404.11879v1)

Published 18 Apr 2024 in cs.DS

Abstract: We study a public event scheduling problem, where multiple public events are scheduled to coordinate the availability of multiple agents. The availability of each agent is determined by solving a separate flexible interval job scheduling problem, where the jobs are required to be preemptively processed. The agents want to attend as many events as possible, and their agreements are considered to be the total length of time during which they can attend these events. The goal is to find a schedule for events as well as the job schedule for each agent such that the total agreement is maximized. We first show that the problem is NP-hard, and then prove that a simple greedy algorithm achieves $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation when the whole timeline is polynomially bounded. Our method also implies a $(1-\frac{1}{e})$-approximate algorithm for this case. Subsequently, for the general timeline case, we present an algorithmic framework that extends a $\frac{1}{\alpha}$-approximate algorithm for the one-event instance to the general case that achieves $\frac{1}{\alpha+1}$-approximation. Finally, we give a polynomial time algorithm that solves the one-event instance, and this implies a $\frac{1}{2}$-approximate algorithm for the general case.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. “Parallel Machine Scheduling to Minimize Energy Consumption” In SODA SIAM, 2020, pp. 2758–2769
  2. Étienne Bamas, Paritosh Garg and Lars Rohwedder “The Submodular Santa Claus Problem in the Restricted Assignment Case” In ICALP 198, LIPIcs Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2021, pp. 22:1–22:18
  3. “The Santa Claus problem” In STOC ACM, 2006, pp. 31–40
  4. Philippe Baptiste “Scheduling unit tasks to minimize the number of idle periods: a polynomial time algorithm for offline dynamic power management” In SODA ACM Press, 2006, pp. 364–367
  5. Xiaohui Bei, Xinhang Lu and Warut Suksompong “Truthful Cake Sharing” In AAAI AAAI Press, 2022, pp. 4809–4817
  6. “Efficient scheduling to minimize calibrations” In SPAA ACM, 2013, pp. 280–287
  7. “Nash Social Welfare in Selfish and Online Load Balancing” In WINE 12495, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer, 2020, pp. 323–337
  8. “Maximizing a Monotone Submodular Function Subject to a Matroid Constraint” In SIAM J. Comput. 40.6, 2011, pp. 1740–1766
  9. Jessica Chang, Harold N. Gabow and Samir Khuller “A Model for Minimizing Active Processor Time” In Algorithmica 70.3, 2014, pp. 368–405
  10. “Active and Busy Time Scheduling Problem: A Survey” In Complexity and Approximation 12000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer, 2020, pp. 219–229
  11. “Minimizing the cost of batch calibrations” In Theor. Comput. Sci. 828-829, 2020, pp. 55–64
  12. “Maximum Coverage Problem with Group Budget Constraints and Applications” In APPROX-RANDOM 3122, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer, 2004, pp. 72–83
  13. “Approximation of Scheduling with Calibrations on Multiple Machines (Brief Announcement)” In SPAA ACM, 2019, pp. 237–239
  14. Vincent Conitzer, Rupert Freeman and Nisarg Shah “Fair Public Decision Making” In EC ACM, 2017, pp. 629–646
  15. Brandon Fain, Kamesh Munagala and Nisarg Shah “Fair Allocation of Indivisible Public Goods” In EC ACM, 2018, pp. 575–592
  16. “Fair Knapsack” In AAAI AAAI Press, 2019, pp. 1941–1948
  17. M.R. Garey and David S. Johnson “Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness” W. H. Freeman, 1979
  18. Jugal Garg, Pooja Kulkarni and Aniket Murhekar “On Fair and Efficient Allocations of Indivisible Public Goods” In FSTTCS 213, LIPIcs Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2021, pp. 22:1–22:19
  19. Thibaut Horel “Notes on greedy algorithms for submodular maximization”, 2015
  20. “Brief Announcement: A Greedy 2 Approximation for the Active Time Problem” In SPAA ACM, 2018, pp. 347–349
  21. Lap Chi Lau and Mohit Singh “Iterative methods in combinatorial optimization” Cambridge University Press, 2011
  22. Jan Karel Lenstra and David B. Shmoys “Elements of Scheduling” In CoRR abs/2001.06005, 2020
  23. Bo Li, Minming Li and Ruilong Zhang “Fair Scheduling for Time-dependent Resources” In NeurIPS, 2021, pp. 21744–21756
  24. Bo Li, Fangxiao Wang and Yu Zhou “Fair Allocation of Indivisible Chores: Beyond Additive Costs” In NeurIPS, 2023, pp. to appear
  25. Shi Li “Scheduling to Minimize Total Weighted Completion Time via Time-Indexed Linear Programming Relaxations” In SIAM J. Comput. 49.4, 2020
  26. Alexander Schrijver “Theory of linear and integer programming”, Wiley-Interscience series in discrete mathematics and optimization Wiley, 1999
  27. “Online Algorithms for the Santa Claus Problem” In NeurIPS, 2022
  28. “Nash Social Welfare in Selfish and Online Load Balancing” In ACM Trans. Economics and Comput. 10.2, 2022, pp. 8:1–8:41
  29. Shengwei Zhou, Rufan Bai and Xiaowei Wu “Multi-agent Online Scheduling: MMS Allocations for Indivisible Items” In ICML 202, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research PMLR, 2023, pp. 42506–42516

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 2 tweets and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: