Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 54 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 196 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 333 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Statistical convex-cocompactness for mapping class groups of non-orientable surfaces (2404.11293v1)

Published 17 Apr 2024 in math.GT and math.DS

Abstract: We show that a finite volume deformation retract $\mathcal{T}{\varepsilon_t}{-}(\mathcal{N}_g)/\mathrm{MCG}(\mathcal{N}_g)$ of the moduli space $\mathcal{M}(\mathcal{N}_g)$ of non-orientable surfaces $\mathcal{N}_g$ behaves like the convex core of $\mathcal{M}(\mathcal{N}_g)$, despite not even being quasi-convex. We then show that geodesics in the convex core leave compact regions with exponentially low probabilities, showing that the action of $\mathrm{MCG}(\mathcal{N}_g)$ on $\mathcal{T}{\varepsilon_t}{-}(\mathcal{N}_g)$ is statistically convex-cocompact. Combined with results of Coulon and Yang, this shows that the growth rate of orbit points under the mapping class group action is purely exponential, pseudo-Anosov elements in mapping class groups of non-orientable surfaces are exponentially generic, and the action of mapping class group on the limit set in the horofunction boundary is ergodic with respect to the Patterson-Sullivan measure. A key step of our proof relies on complexity length, developed by Dowdall and Masur, which is an alternative notion of distance on Teichm\"uller space that accounts for geodesics that spend a considerable fraction of their time in the thin part.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. “Lattice point asymptotics and volume growth on Teichmüller space” In Duke Mathematical Journal 161.6 Duke University Press, 2012, pp. 1055–1111 DOI: 10.1215/00127094-1548443
  2. Francisco Arana-Herrera “Counting problems from the viewpoint of ergodic theory: from primitive integer points to simple closed curves” In arXiv e-prints, 2022, pp. arXiv:2202.04156 DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2202.04156
  3. Martine Babillot “On the mixing property for hyperbolic systems” In Israel journal of mathematics 129 Springer, 2002, pp. 61–76
  4. Jason Behrstock, Mark Hagen and Alessandro Sisto “Hierarchically hyperbolic spaces II: Combination theorems and the distance formula” In Pacific Journal of Mathematics 299.2 Mathematical Sciences Publishers, 2019, pp. 257–338
  5. “Geometry and rigidity of mapping class groups” In Geometry & Topology 16.2 Mathematical Sciences Publishers, 2012, pp. 781–888
  6. “Mixing of the geodesic flow for a group with a contracting element”
  7. Rémi Coulon “Patterson-Sullivan theory for groups with a strongly contracting element” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.07361, 2022
  8. Rémi Coulon “Ergodicity of the geodesic flow for groups with a contracting element”, 2024 arXiv:2303.01390 [math.DS]
  9. “Lattice point counting for finite-order mapping classes”, 2023 arXiv:2305.03721 [math.GT]
  10. “Mapping class group orbit closures for non-orientable surfaces” In Geometric and Functional Analysis Springer, 2023, pp. 1–57
  11. “Counting closed geodesics in moduli space” In Journal of Modern Dynamics 5.1, 2011, pp. 71–105
  12. “10. Margulis functions and their applications” In The Impact of Margulis on Modern Mathematics Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2022, pp. 342–361 DOI: doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226804163-011
  13. “Convex cocompact subgroups of mapping class groups” In Geometry & Topology 6.1 Mathematical Sciences Publishers, 2002, pp. 91–152
  14. Matthieu Gendulphe “What’s wrong with the growth of simple closed geodesics on nonorientable hyperbolic surfaces” In arXiv e-prints, 2017, pp. arXiv:1706.08798 arXiv:1706.08798 [math.GT]
  15. “Dynamics of subgroups of mapping class groups”, 2023 arXiv:2311.03779 [math.GT]
  16. Sayantan Khan “The limit set of non-orientable mapping class groups” In Journal of Modern Dynamics 19.0, 2023 DOI: 10.3934/jmd.2023007
  17. Sayantan Khan, Caleb Partin and Rebecca R Winarski “Pseudo-Anosov homeomorphisms of punctured nonorientable surfaces with small stretch factor” In Algebraic & Geometric Topology 23.6 Mathematical Sciences Publishers, 2023, pp. 2823–2856
  18. Christopher J Leininger and Alan W Reid “A combination theorem for Veech subgroups of the mapping class group” In Geometric & Functional Analysis GAFA 16 Springer, 2006, pp. 403–436
  19. “Minimal pseudo-Anosov stretch factors on nonoriented surfaces” In Algebraic & Geometric Topology, 2018 URL: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:56112676
  20. Michael Magee “Counting One-Sided Simple Closed Geodesics on Fuchsian Thrice Punctured Projective Planes” In International Mathematics Research Notices 2020.13, 2018, pp. 3886–3901 DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rny112
  21. GA Margulis “On some aspects of the theory of Anosov systems” Springer, 2004
  22. Howard Masur “Interval exchange transformations and measured foliations” In Annals of Mathematics 115.1 JSTOR, 1982, pp. 169–200
  23. Yair N Minsky “Quasi-projections in Teichmüller space.” In Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) 1996.473 De Gruyter Berlin, New York, 1996, pp. 121–136
  24. Yair N. Minsky “Extremal length estimates and product regions in Teichmüller space” In Duke Math. J. 85.1, 1996, pp. 249–286 URL: http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1077244446
  25. Maryam Mirzakhani “Growth of the number of simple closed geodesics on hyperbolic surfaces” In Annals of Mathematics JSTOR, 2008, pp. 97–125
  26. Hideki Miyachi “Teichmüller rays and the Gardiner–Masur boundary of Teichmüller space” In Geometriae Dedicata 137 Springer, 2008, pp. 113–141
  27. “The geometry of the disk complex” In Journal of the American Mathematical Society 26.1, 2013, pp. 1–62
  28. Paul Norbury “Lengths of geodesics on non-orientable hyperbolic surfaces” In Geometriae Dedicata 134 Springer, 2008, pp. 153–176
  29. Robert C Penner “A construction of pseudo-Anosov homeomorphisms” In Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 310.1, 1988, pp. 179–197
  30. Jean-François Quint “An overview of Patterson-Sullivan theory” In Workshop The barycenter method, FIM, Zurich, 2006
  31. Kasra Rafi “A combinatorial model for the Teichmüller metric” In GAFA Geometric And Functional Analysis 17 Springer, 2007, pp. 936–959
  32. Thomas Roblin “Ergodicité et équidistribution en courbure négative” Société mathématique de France, 2003
  33. Martin Scharlemann “The Complex of Curves on Non-Orientable Surfaces” In Journal of the London Mathematical Society 2.1 Citeseer, 1982, pp. 171–184
  34. Alessandro Sisto “Contracting elements and random walks” In Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) 2018.742, 2018, pp. 79–114 DOI: doi:10.1515/crelle-2015-0093
  35. Douglas Stanford “A Mirzakhani recursion for non-orientable surfaces”, 2023 arXiv:2303.04049 [hep-th]
  36. Dennis Sullivan “The density at infinity of a discrete group of hyperbolic motions” In Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 50, 1979, pp. 171–202
  37. Wen-yuan Yang “Statistically Convex-Cocompact Actions of Groups with Contracting Elements” In International Mathematics Research Notices 2019.23, 2018, pp. 7259–7323 DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rny001
  38. Wen-yuan Yang “Genericity of contracting elements in groups” In Mathematische Annalen 376.3 Springer, 2020, pp. 823–861

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 0 likes.