Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 80 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 60 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 87 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 173 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 433 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Hidden BPS states of electroweak monopole and a new bound estimate (2404.08881v2)

Published 13 Apr 2024 in hep-ph and hep-th

Abstract: Using the BPS Lagrangian method, we obtain a distinct set of Bogomolny equations for the Cho-Maison monopoles from the bosonic sector of a regularized electroweak theory. In the limit of $n\rightarrow\infty$ of the permittivity regulator, $\epsilon\left(\rhon\right)$, the mass of the monopole can be estimated to be $M_W\sim3.56$ TeV. This value is within the latest theoretical window, 2.98 TeV - 3.75 TeV. We also discuss some possible regularization mechanisms of electroweak monopole in the Yang-Mills sector and the existence of its BPS state.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. P. A. M. Dirac, “The Theory of magnetic poles,” Phys. Rev. 74, 817-830 (1948)
  2. T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, “Dirac Monopole Without Strings: Monopole Harmonics,” Nucl. Phys. B 107, 365 (1976)
  3. G. ’t Hooft, “Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 79, 276-284 (1974)
  4. A. M. Polyakov, “Particle Spectrum in Quantum Field Theory,” JETP Lett. 20, 194-195 (1974)
  5. J. Preskill, “MAGNETIC MONOPOLES,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 34 (1984), 461-530
  6. Y. M. Shnir, “Magnetic Monopoles,” Springer, 2005, ISBN 978-3-540-25277-1, 978-3-540-29082-7
  7. S. Weinberg, “A Model of Leptons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264-1266 (1967)
  8. A. Salam, “Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions,” Conf. Proc. C 680519, 367-377 (1968)
  9. N. S. Manton, “Topology in the Weinberg-Salam Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983), 2019
  10. Y. M. Cho and D. Maison, “Monopoles in Weinberg-Salam model,” Phys. Lett. B 391, 360-365 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9601028 [hep-th]]
  11. Y. M. Cho, K. Kimm and J. H. Yoon, “Mass of the Electroweak Monopole,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 31 (2016) no.09, 1650053 [arXiv:1212.3885 [hep-ph]].
  12. Y. M. Cho, K. Kim and J. H. Yoon, “Finite Energy Electroweak Dyon,” Eur. Phys. J. C 75 no.2, 67 (2015) [arXiv:1305.1699 [hep-ph]]
  13. R. Gervalle and M. S. Volkov, “Electroweak monopoles and their stability,” Nucl. Phys. B 984 (2022), 115937 [arXiv:2203.16590 [hep-th]].
  14. C. P. Dokos and T. N. Tomaras, “Monopoles and Dyons in the SU(5) Model,” Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980), 2940
  15. F. A. Bais and R. J. Russell, “Magnetic Monopole Solution of Nonabelian Gauge Theory in Curved Space-Time,” Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975), 2692 [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 12 (1975), 3368]
  16. J. L. Pinfold [MOEDAL], “Searching for exotic particles at the LHC with dedicated detectors,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 78 (1999), 52-57
  17. V. A. Mitsou [MoEDAL], “MoEDAL: Seeking magnetic monopoles and more at the LHC,” PoS EPS-HEP2015 (2015), 109 [arXiv:1511.01745 [physics.ins-det]].
  18. A. Katre [MoEDAL], “Magnetic monopole search with the MoEDAL test trapping detector,” EPJ Web Conf. 126 (2016), 04025
  19. J. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, and T. You, “The Price of an Electroweak Monopole,” Phys. Lett. B 756 (2016), 29-35 [arXiv:1602.01745 [hep-ph]].
  20. “Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 7 and 8 TeV,” ATLAS-CONF-2015-044.
  21. E. B. Bogomolny, “Stability of Classical Solutions,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 24 (1976), 449 PRINT-76-0543 (LANDAU-INST.).
  22. M. K. Prasad and C. M. Sommerfield, “An Exact Classical Solution for the ’t Hooft Monopole and the Julia-Zee Dyon,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 (1975), 760-762
  23. F. Blaschke and P. Beneš, “BPS Cho–Maison monopole,” PTEP 2018 (2018) no.7, 073B03 [arXiv:1711.04842 [hep-th]].
  24. P. Zhang, L. P. Zou and Y. M. Cho, “Regularization of Electroweak Monopole by Charge Screening and BPS Energy Bound,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80 no.3, 280 (2020) [arXiv:2001.08866 [hep-th]]
  25. R. Casana, M. M. Ferreira, Jr and E. da Hora, “Generalized BPS magnetic monopoles,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012), 085034 [arXiv:1210.3382 [hep-th]].
  26. R. Casana, M. M. Ferreira, E. da Hora and C. dos Santos, “Analytical self-dual solutions in a nonstandard Yang–Mills–Higgs scenario,” Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013), 193-197 [arXiv:1304.3382 [hep-th]].
  27. H. S. Ramadhan, “Some exact BPS solutions for exotic vortices and monopoles,” Phys. Lett. B 758 (2016), 140-145 [arXiv:1512.01640 [hep-th]].
  28. N. E. Mavromatos and V. A. Mitsou, “Magnetic monopoles revisited: Models and searches at colliders and in the Cosmos,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 (2020) no.23, 2030012 [arXiv:2005.05100 [hep-ph]].
  29. K. Sokalski, T. Wietecha and Z. Lisowski, “A concept of strong necessary condition in nonlinear field theory,” Acta Phys. Polon. B 32 (2001), 2771-2792
  30. C. Adam, L. A. Ferreira, E. da Hora, A. Wereszczynski and W. J. Zakrzewski, “Some aspects of self-duality and generalised BPS theories,” JHEP 08 (2013), 062 [arXiv:1305.7239 [hep-th]].
  31. A. N. Atmaja and H. S. Ramadhan, “Bogomol’nyi equations of classical solutions,” Phys. Rev. D 90, no.10, 105009 (2014) [arXiv:1406.6180 [hep-th]]
  32. A. N. Atmaja, “A Method for BPS Equations of Vortices,” Phys. Lett. B 768, 351-358 (2017) [arXiv:1511.01620 [hep-th]]
  33. A. N. Atmaja and I. Prasetyo, “BPS Equations of Monopole and Dyon in S⁢U⁢(2)𝑆𝑈2SU(2)italic_S italic_U ( 2 ) Yang-Mills-Higgs Model, Nakamula-Shiraishi Models, and their Generalized Versions from the BPS Lagrangian Method,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2018, 7376534 (2018) [arXiv:1803.06122 [hep-th]]
  34. M. Born and L. Infeld, “Foundations of the new field theory,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 144 (1934) no.852, 425-451
  35. S. Arunasalam and A. Kobakhidze, “Electroweak monopoles and the electroweak phase transition,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77 no.7, 444 (2017) [arXiv:1702.04068 [hep-ph]]
  36. J. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos and T. You, “Light-by-Light Scattering Constraint on Born-Infeld Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, no.26, 261802 (2017) [arXiv:1703.08450 [hep-ph]]
  37. P. De Fabritiis and J. A. Helayël-Neto, “Electroweak monopoles with a non-linearly realized weak hypercharge,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81, no.9, 788 (2021) [arXiv:2106.08743 [hep-th]]
  38. S. Arunasalam, D. Collison and A. Kobakhidze, “Electroweak monopoles and electroweak baryogenesis,” arXiv:1810.10696 [hep-ph]
  39. N. E. Grandi, E. F. Moreno and F. A. Schaposnik, “Monopoles in nonAbelian Dirac-Born-Infeld theory,” Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999), 125014 [arXiv:hep-th/9901073 [hep-th]].
  40. A. N. Atmaja, “Are there BPS dyons in the generalized SU(2) Yang–Mills–Higgs model?,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82 no.7, 602 (2022) [arXiv:2002.09123 [hep-th]]

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 2 posts and received 2 likes.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to View