Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Phenomenon of a stronger trapping behaviour in $Λ$-type quantum systems with symmetry

Published 10 Apr 2024 in quant-ph, physics.atom-ph, and physics.optics | (2404.06937v1)

Abstract: $\Lambda$, $V$, $\Xi$ (ladder), and other three-level quantum systems with one forbidden transition ($\Lambda$-type systems) play an important role in quantum physics. Various applications require manipulation by such systems using as control shaped laser field. In this work, we study how degeneracy in energy states and Bohr frequencies of these systems affects the efficiency or difficulty of finding optimal shape of the control field. For this, we adopt the notion of higher order traps which was introduced in [A.N. Pechen and D.J. Tannor, Are there traps in quantum control landscapes? Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 106}, 120402 (2011)], where second/third order traps were discovered for $\Lambda$-type systems with one forbidden transition and with non-degenerate energy levels. We study control of such systems with and without denegeracy in their eigenstates and Bohr frequencies, and investigate how these degeneracies influence on the efficiency of optimizing the control laser field. We find that the degeneracy of Bohr frequencies in the $\Xi$ system leads to the appearance of seventh order trap with a more significant attracting domain resulting in a more difficult optimization, while degeneracy in energy states of $\Lambda$-type systems does not lead to increase of the order of the zero control trap compared to the non-degenerate case.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (60)
  1. Quantum optimal control in quantum technologies. Strategic report on current status, visions and goals for research in Europe. EPJ Quantum Technology, 9(1):19, 2022.
  2. Control of quantum phenomena. Advances in Chemical Physics, 148(1):1–76, 2012.
  3. D.J. Tannor. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. University Science Books, 2007.
  4. J.E. Gough. Principles and applications of quantum control engineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 370(1979):5241–5258, 2012.
  5. Introduction to theoretical and experimental aspects of quantum optimal control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.00532, 2024.
  6. Quantum optimally controlled transition landscapes. Science, 303(5666):1998–2001, 2004.
  7. T.-S. Ho and H. Rabitz. Why do effective quantum controls appear easy to find. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 226(180):226–240, 2006.
  8. A. Pechen and N. Il’in. Trap-free manipulation in the Landau-Zener system. Physical Review A, 86(5):052117, 2012.
  9. Quantum control landscape for ultrafast generation of single-qubit phase shift quantum gates. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 54(21):215303, 2021.
  10. On the detailed structure of quantum control landscape for fast single qubit phase-shift gate generation. Izvestiya: Mathematics, 87(5):906–919, 2023.
  11. P. de Fouquieres and S.G. Schirmer. A closer look at quantum control landscapes and their implication for control optimization. Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics, 16(3):1350021, 2013.
  12. Constraint optimization and S⁢U⁢(N)𝑆𝑈𝑁SU(N)italic_S italic_U ( italic_N ) quantum control landscapes. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 55(11):115301, 2022.
  13. Are there traps in quantum control landscapes? Physical Review Letters, 106(12):120402, 2011.
  14. Quantum control landscape for a Lambda-atom in the vicinity of second-order traps. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 52(5):467–472, 2012.
  15. Time-minimum control of quantum purity for 2-level Lindblad equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems — S, 13(4):1061–1073, 2020.
  16. G.C. Hegerfeldt. Driving at the quantum speed limit: Optimal control of a two-level system. Physical Review Letters, 111(26):260501, 2017.
  17. Quantum control landscape for a two-level system near the quantum speed limit. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 51(38):385305, 2018.
  18. D. Stefanatos and E. Paspalakis. Optimal shortcuts of stimulated Raman adiabatic passage in the presence of dissipation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 380(2239):20210283, 2022.
  19. Optimal STIRAP shortcuts using the spin-to-spring mapping. Physical Review A, 107(5):052606, 2023.
  20. L. Lokutsievskiy and A. Pechen. Reachable sets for two-level open quantum systems driven by coherent and incoherent controls. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 54(39):395304, 2021.
  21. L. Lokutsievskiy and A. Pechen. Time-optimal state transfer for an open qubit. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.10099, 2024.
  22. Higher-order traps for some strongly degenerate quantum control systems. Russian Mathematical Surveys, 78(2):390–392, 2023.
  23. A. Pechen and D. Tannor. Pechen and Tannor Reply. Physical Review Letters, 108(22):198902, 2012.
  24. Coherent amplification of an ultrashort pulse in a three-level medium without a population inversion. Pisma v Zhurnal Eksperimentalnoi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, 48(11):581–584, 1988.
  25. S. E. Harris. Lasers without inversion: Interference of lifetime-broadened resonances. Physical Review Letters, 62(9):1033–1036, 1989.
  26. Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  27. Electromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media. Reviews of Modern Physics, 77(3):633–673, 2005.
  28. Observation of V𝑉Vitalic_V-type electromagnetically induced transparency in a sodium atomic beam. Foundations of Physics, 28(4):621–638, 1998.
  29. Electromagnetically induced transparency in ladder-type inhomogeneously broadened media: Theory and experiment. Physical Review A, 51(1):576–584, 1995.
  30. Doubly dressed states in a ladder-type system with electromagnetically induced transparency. Physical Review A, 76(5):053420, 2007.
  31. D. D’Alessandro and Y. Işik. Optimal control of quantum lambda systems with an occupancy cost. Automatica, 163(1):111595, 2024.
  32. Quantum control and quantum control landscapes using intense shaped femtosecond pulses. Journal of Modern Optics, 52(16):2187–2195, 2005.
  33. Properties of wave packets deduced from quantum control fitness landscapes. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 80(5):53001, 2007.
  34. Molecular quantum control landscapes in von Neumann time-frequency phase space. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 133(16):164510, 2010.
  35. Steering the optimization pathway in the control landscape using constraints. Physical Review A, 88(5):053409, 2013.
  36. Exploring quantum control landscape structure. Physical Review A, 88(3):033425, 2013.
  37. Quantum-control-landscape structure viewed along straight paths through the space of control fields. Physical Review A, 93(2):023427, 2016.
  38. Evolutionary algorithms for hard quantum control. Physical Review A, 90(3):032310, 2014.
  39. Experimental observation of saddle points over the quantum control landscape of a two-spin system. Physical Review A, 91(4):043412, 2015.
  40. Dressing the chopped-random-basis optimization: A bandwidth-limited access to the trap-free landscape. Physical Review A, 92(6):062343, 2015.
  41. Broken symmetry in a two-qubit quantum control landscape. Physical Review A, 97(5):052114, 2018.
  42. Learning robust and high-precision quantum controls. Physical Review A, 99(4):042327, 2019.
  43. Universal quantum control through deep reinforcement learning. npj Quantum Information, 5(1):33, 2019.
  44. Predicting quantum dynamical cost landscapes with deep learning. Physical Review A, 105(1):012402, 2022.
  45. X. Li. Optimal control of quantum state preparation and entanglement creation in two-qubit quantum system with bounded amplitude. Scientific Reports, 13(1):14734, 2023.
  46. Comparing, optimizing, and benchmarking quantum-control algorithms in a unifying programming framework. Physical Review A, 84(2):022305, 2011.
  47. Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: design of NMR pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 172(2):296–305, 2005.
  48. Complete controllability of quantum systems. Physical Review A, 63(6):063410, 2001.
  49. A.F. Filippov. Differential Equations with Discontinuous Righthand Sides / Transl. from the edition published in Russian in 1985. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1988.
  50. F. Albertini and D. D’Alessandro. Notions of controllability for bilinear multilevel quantum systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 48(8):1399–1403, 2003.
  51. Controllability of molecular systems. Physical Review A, 51(2):960–966, 1995.
  52. G. Turinici and H. Rabitz. Quantum wavefunction controllability. Chemical Physics, 267(1):1–9, 2001.
  53. Uncontrollable quantum systems: A classification scheme based on Lie subalgebras. Physical Review A, 79(5):53403, 2009.
  54. On controllability of 𝚲𝚲\boldsymbol{\Lambda}bold_Λ- and 𝐕𝐕\mathbf{V}bold_V-atoms and other three-level systems with two allowed transitions. Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics, 44(6):2101–2108, 2023.
  55. Singularities of quantum control landscapes. Physical Review A, 86(1):013405, 2012.
  56. Coherent dynamics of N𝑁Nitalic_N-level atoms and molecules. III. An analytically soluble periodic case. Physical Review A, 20(2):539–544, 1979.
  57. F. T. Hioe. Dynamic symmetries in quantum electronics. Physical Review A, 28(2):879–886, 1983.
  58. D. Sugny and C. Kontz. Optimal control of a three-level quantum system by laser fields plus von Neumann measurements. Physical Review A, 77(6):063420, 2008.
  59. Control of quantum dynamics by optimized measurements. Physical Review A, 78(6):063422, 2008.
  60. M. Elovenkova and A. Pechen. Control landscape of measurement-assisted transition probability for a three-level quantum system with dynamical symmetry. Quantum Reports, 5(3):526–545, 2023.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.