Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 188 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 57 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 431 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Replication-based quantum annealing error mitigation (2404.06580v1)

Published 9 Apr 2024 in quant-ph

Abstract: Quantum annealers like those from D-Wave Systems implement adiabatic quantum computing to solve optimization problems, but their analog nature and limited control functionalities present challenges to correcting or mitigating errors. As quantum computing advances towards applications, effective error suppression is an important research goal. We propose a new approach called replication based mitigation (RBM) based on parallel quantum annealing. In RBM, physical qubits representing the same logical qubit are dispersed across different copies of the problem embedded in the hardware. This mitigates hardware biases, is compatible with limited qubit connectivity in current annealers, and is suited for available noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) annealers. Our experimental analysis shows that RBM provides solution quality on par with previous methods while being compatible with a much wider range of hardware connectivity patterns. In comparisons against standard quantum annealing without error mitigation, RBM consistently improves the energies and ground state probabilities across parameterized problem sets.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. Quantum error mitigation in quantum annealing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01306, 2023.
  2. Topological quantum error correction with optimal encoding rate. Physical Review A, 75(3):032327, 2007.
  3. Next-generation topology of d-wave quantum processors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.00133, 2020.
  4. Quantum error mitigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00921, 2022.
  5. Vicky Choi. Minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum computation: I. the parameter setting problem. Quantum Information Processing, 7(5):193–209, 2008.
  6. Vicky Choi. Minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum computation: Ii. minor-universal graph design. Quantum Information Processing, 10(3):343–353, 2011.
  7. Jack Edmonds. Paths, trees, and flowers. Canadian Journal of mathematics, 17(3):449–467, 1965.
  8. Practical quantum error mitigation for near-future applications. Physical Review X, 8(3):031027, 2018.
  9. Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation. Physical Review A, 86(3):032324, 2012.
  10. Towards practical classical processing for the surface code. Physical Review Letters, 108(18):180501, 2012.
  11. Daniel Gottesman. Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction. arXiv preprint arXiv:quant-ph/9705052, 1997.
  12. Probing for quantum speedup in spin-glass problems with planted solutions. Physical Review A, 92(4):042325, 2015.
  13. Alexei Yu Kitaev. Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Annals of Physics, 303(1):2–30, 2003.
  14. Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimization. Physical Review X, 7(2):021050, 2017.
  15. A. Lucas. Ising formulations of many NP problems. Front Physics, 2(5), 2014.
  16. Mean field analysis of quantum annealing correction. Physical review letters, 116(22):220501, 2016.
  17. Nested quantum annealing correction at finite temperature: p-spin models. Physical Review A, 99(6):062307, 2019.
  18. Analog errors in quantum annealing: Doom and hope. npj Quantum Information, 5(1):107, 2019.
  19. Parallel quantum annealing. Scientific Reports, 12:4499, 2022.
  20. Noise dynamics of quantum annealers: estimating the effective noise using idle qubits. Quantum Science and Technology, 8(3):035005, 2023.
  21. Error-corrected quantum annealing with hundreds of qubits. Nature Communications, 5(3243), 2014.
  22. Peter W Shor. Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory. Physical review A, 52(4):R2493, 1995.
  23. Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits. Physical review letters, 119(18):180509, 2017.
  24. Decoding small surface codes with feedforward neural networks. Quantum, 4:290, 2020.
  25. Quantum annealing correction with minor embedding. Physical Review A, 92(4):042310, 2015.
  26. Nested quantum annealing correction. npj Quantum Information, 2(1):1–6, 2016.
  27. Dynamical decoupling of open quantum systems. Physical Review Letters, 82(12):2417, 1999.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: