Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

THOUGHTSCULPT: Reasoning with Intermediate Revision and Search (2404.05966v2)

Published 9 Apr 2024 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: We present THOUGHTSCULPT, a general reasoning and search method for tasks with outputs that can be decomposed into components. THOUGHTSCULPT explores a search tree of potential solutions using Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), building solutions one action at a time and evaluating according to any domain-specific heuristic, which in practice is often simply an LLM evaluator. Critically, our action space includes revision actions: THOUGHTSCULPT may choose to revise part of its previous output rather than continuing to build the rest of its output. Empirically, THOUGHTSCULPT outperforms state-of-the-art reasoning methods across three challenging tasks: Story Outline Improvement (up to +30% interestingness), Mini-Crosswords Solving (up to +16% word success rate), and Constrained Generation (up to +10% concept coverage).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. Anthropic, 2024. URL https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-3-family.
  2. Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback, 2022.
  3. Graph of thoughts: Solving elaborate problems with large language models, 2024.
  4. Language models are few-shot learners, 2020.
  5. Teaching large language models to self-debug, 2023.
  6. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models, 2022.
  7. Nl-edit: Correcting semantic parse errors through natural language interaction, 2021.
  8. Language models as zero-shot planners: Extracting actionable knowledge for embodied agents, 2022a.
  9. Inner monologue: Embodied reasoning through planning with language models, 2022b.
  10. Language models can solve computer tasks, 2023.
  11. Coderl: Mastering code generation through pretrained models and deep reinforcement learning, 2022.
  12. CommonGen: A constrained text generation challenge for generative commonsense reasoning. In Trevor Cohn, Yulan He, and Yang Liu (eds.), Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pp.  1823–1840, Online, November 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.165. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.findings-emnlp.165.
  13. Decomposing complex queries for tip-of-the-tongue retrieval, 2023.
  14. Rainier: Reinforced knowledge introspector for commonsense question answering, 2022.
  15. Quark: Controllable text generation with reinforced unlearning, 2022.
  16. Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback, May 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17651. arXiv:2303.17651 [cs].
  17. Co-writing screenplays and theatre scripts with language models: An evaluation by industry professionals, 2022.
  18. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report, 2024.
  19. REFINER: Reasoning Feedback on Intermediate Representations, February 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.01904. arXiv:2304.01904 [cs].
  20. Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning, October 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11366. arXiv:2303.11366 [cs].
  21. Learning to repair: Repairing model output errors after deployment using a dynamic memory of feedback, 2022.
  22. Zero-shot sonnet generation with discourse-level planning and aesthetics features. In Marine Carpuat, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, and Ivan Vladimir Meza Ruiz (eds.), Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp.  3587–3597, Seattle, United States, July 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.262. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.naacl-main.262.
  23. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models, 2023a.
  24. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models, 2023b.
  25. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models, 2023a.
  26. Describe, explain, plan and select: Interactive planning with large language models enables open-world multi-task agents, 2023b.
  27. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models, 2023.
  28. Generating sequences by learning to self-correct, 2022.
  29. Self-evaluation guided beam search for reasoning, 2023.
  30. Re3: Generating Longer Stories With Recursive Reprompting and Revision, October 2022. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.06774. arXiv:2210.06774 [cs].
  31. DOC: Improving Long Story Coherence With Detailed Outline Control, June 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10077. arXiv:2212.10077 [cs].
  32. Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models, May 2023a. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10601. arXiv:2305.10601 [cs].
  33. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models, 2023b.
Citations (5)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper introduces ThoughtSculpt, a novel framework that integrates intermediate revision with Monte Carlo Tree Search to enhance LLM reasoning.
  • It demonstrates performance improvements across tasks such as story outlining, mini-crossword solving, and constrained text generation with gains of up to 30%, 16%, and 10% respectively.
  • The framework’s modular design, featuring a thought evaluator, generator, and decision simulator, enables dynamic error correction and continuous output refinement.

Introduction

The rapid evolution of LLMs has significantly impacted various domains, expanding the capabilities of AI systems in complex reasoning tasks. However, when faced with tasks that inherently require iterative refinement and exploration, existing models and methodologies often reach their limitations. The paper "ThoughtSculpt: Reasoning with Intermediate Revision and Search" by Yizhou Chi, Kevin Yang, and Dan Klein introduces a novel framework aimed at addressing this gap. ThoughtSculpt leverages the power of Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively explore and refine the output space, incorporating a unique self-revision mechanism that enables continuous improvement of LLM outputs.

Technique Overview

ThoughtSculpt is designed around the concept of handling tasks where the outputs can be dissected into components, thereby enabling an action space that includes revision actions. This means that apart from generating new content, the model can choose to revise previous outputs, adding a new layer of flexibility and depth to the problem-solving process. The core components of the framework are the thought evaluator, thought generator, and decision simulator. These modules synergize to evaluate potential solution components, generate candidate solutions based on both original instructions and received feedback, and simulate decision making to explore different outcomes, respectively.

Empirical Evidence

The effectiveness of ThoughtSculpt is empirically demonstrated across three distinct tasks: Story Outline Improvement, Mini-Crosswords Solving, and Constrained Generation. Notably, ThoughtSculpt outperforms state-of-the-art reasoning methods, showing up to 30% improvement in interestingness for story outlines, up to 16% increase in word success rate for mini-crossword solving, and up to 10% better concept coverage in constrained text generation. These improvements highlight the model’s ability to navigate and refine solutions effectively across varied domains.

Theoretical Implications and Speculation on Future Developments

From a theoretical standpoint, ThoughtSculpt presents an interesting exploration into the capacity of LLMs to revise and refine their outputs dynamically. This ability mimics a more human-like approach to problem-solving, where decisions can be revisited and altered based on new insights or evaluations. The use of MCTS, in particular, emphasizes the potential of heuristic search techniques in effectively managing the vast search spaces characteristic of text generation tasks.

Looking ahead, we speculate that the principles behind ThoughtSculpt could inspire further research into models that dynamically interact with their generated content, potentially leading to more autonomous and adaptable AI systems. Moreover, the integration of revision actions poses intriguing possibilities for applications requiring high levels of creativity and innovation, such as content creation, programming, and design.

Ethical Considerations and Reproducibility

The authors responsibly address ethical considerations and reproducibility. They provide transparent usage of datasets and ensure all experiments leverage publicly accessible resources. Open-source models like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, though employed, present challenges in exact reproducibility due to potential future changes in OpenAI's API, which the authors duly note.

Conclusion

ThoughtSculpt marks a significant stride in the ongoing development of AI's reasoning capabilities. By infusing the problem-solving process with the capacity for iterative refinement and leveraging the efficiency of MCTS, ThoughtSculpt not only enhances the performance of LLMs but also opens new avenues for research into generative AI's potential for dynamic, self-adjusting output generation. As AI continues to permeate various facets of human endeavor, such advancements underscore the importance of continual innovation and exploration within the field.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown

Whiteboard

Paper to Video (Beta)

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 11 tweets with 401 likes about this paper.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up for Free