Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Designing a User-centric Framework for Information Quality Ranking of Large-scale Street View Images (2404.00392v1)

Published 30 Mar 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Street view imagery (SVI), largely captured via outfitted fleets or mounted dashcams in consumer vehicles is a rapidly growing source of geospatial data used in urban sensing and development. These datasets are often collected opportunistically, are massive in size, and vary in quality which limits the scope and extent of their use in urban planning. Thus far there has not been much work to identify the obstacles experienced and tools needed by the users of such datasets. This severely limits the opportunities of using emerging street view images in supporting novel research questions that can improve the quality of urban life. This work includes a formative interview study with 5 expert users of large-scale street view datasets from academia, urban planning, and related professions which identifies novel use cases, challenges, and opportunities to increase the utility of these datasets. Based on the user findings, we present a framework to evaluate the quality of information for street images across three attributes (spatial, temporal, and content) that stakeholders can utilize for estimating the value of a dataset, and to improve it over time for their respective use case. We then present a case study using novel street view images where we evaluate our framework and present practical use cases for users. We discuss the implications for designing future systems to support the collection and use of street view data to assist in sensing and planning the urban environment.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (135)
  1. 2022a. New York City, Department of Planning. Retrieved May 27, 2022 from https://www.nyc.gov/site/planning/index.page
  2. 2022b. Open Data, City of New York. Retrieved May 27, 2022 from https://opendata.cityofnewyork.us
  3. The history began from alexnet: A comprehensive survey on deep learning approaches. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.01164 (2018).
  4. Combining street-level and aerial images for dengue incidence rate estimation. In 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 1–8.
  5. Google Street View: Capturing the World at Street Level. Computer 43, 6 (2010), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2010.170
  6. A vehicle for research: using street sweepers to explore the landscape of environmental community action. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 375–384.
  7. Neural Codes for Image Retrieval. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1404.1777
  8. What Is Wrong With Scene Text Recognition Model Comparisons? Dataset and Model Analysis. In 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 4714–4722. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2019.00481
  9. Value of information and mobility constraints for sampling with mobile sensors. Computers and Geosciences 49 (08 2012), 102–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.07.005
  10. Value of information and mobility constraints for sampling with mobile sensors. Computers & Geosciences 49 (2012), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.07.005
  11. Emily M. Bender and Batya Friedman. 2018. Data Statements for Natural Language Processing: Toward Mitigating System Bias and Enabling Better Science. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 6 (2018), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00041
  12. Filip Biljecki and Koichi Ito. 2021a. Street view imagery in urban analytics and GIS: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning 215 (2021), 104217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104217
  13. Filip Biljecki and Koichi Ito. 2021b. Street view imagery in urban analytics and GIS: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning 215 (2021), 104217.
  14. Multi-source urban data fusion for property value assessment: A case study in Philadelphia. Neurocomputing 404 (2020), 70–83.
  15. Chatschik Bisdikian. 2007. On Sensor Sampling and Quality of Information: A Starting Point. In Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerComW’07). 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2007.88
  16. On the Quality and Value of Information in Sensor Networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 9, 4, Article 48 (jul 2013), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2489253.2489265
  17. Stochastic Event Capture Using Mobile Sensors Subject to a Quality Metric. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Los Angeles, CA, USA) (MobiCom ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1145/1161089.1161102
  18. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006a. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa arXiv:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  19. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006b. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.
  20. Marcus Buckmann and Özgür Şimşek. 2017. Decision Heuristics for Comparison:How Good Are They?. In Proceedings of the NIPS 2016 Workshop on Imperfect Decision Makers (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 58), Tatiana V. Guy, Miroslav Kárný, David Rios-Insua, and David H. Wolpert (Eds.). PMLR, 1–11. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v58/buckmann17a.html
  21. Detecting and mapping traffic signs from Google Street View images using deep learning and GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 77 (2019), 101350.
  22. Walkway discovery from large scale crowdsensing. In 2018 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). IEEE, 13–24.
  23. Nicole Casal Moore. 2020. Live public street cams are tracking social distancing. https://news.engin.umich.edu/2020/04/public-street-cams-show-of-empty-streets-around-the-world/
  24. Mapping the essential urban land use in Changchun by applying random forest and multi-source geospatial data. Remote Sensing 12, 15 (2020), 2488.
  25. Estimating pedestrian volume using Street View images: A large-scale validation test. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 81 (2020), 101481.
  26. Towards sensing urban-scale COVID-19 policy compliance in new york city. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation. 353–356.
  27. Tracking urban heartbeat and policy compliance through vision and language-based sensing. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation. 302–306.
  28. Not all protected bike lanes are the same: Infrastructure and risk of cyclist collisions and falls leading to emergency department visits in three US cities. Accident Analysis & Prevention 141 (2020), 105490.
  29. The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment. Landscape and Urban Planning 80, 1 (2007), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.008
  30. Image-based surrogates of socio-economic status in urban neighborhoods using deep multiple instance learning. Journal of Imaging 4, 11 (2018), 125.
  31. Can Duruk and Sam Hashemi. 2022. The best way to make maps on the internet. https://felt.com/
  32. Urban zoning using higher-order markov random fields on multi-view imagery data. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 614–630.
  33. Visual Exploration of Big Spatio-Temporal Urban Data: A Study of New York City Taxi Trips. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2149–2158. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.226
  34. Arturo Flores and Serge Belongie. 2010. Removing pedestrians from Google street view images. In 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Workshops. 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2010.5543255
  35. Design and Destinations: Factors Influencing Walking and Total Physical Activity. Urban Studies 45, 9 (August 2008), 1973–1996. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008093386
  36. Large-scale Privacy Protection in Google Street View. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. https://research.google.com/archive/papers/cbprivacy_iccv09.pdf
  37. Assessing Google street view image availability in Latin American cities. Journal of urban health 97 (2020), 552–560.
  38. Do street-level scene perceptions affect housing prices in Chinese megacities? An analysis using open access datasets and deep learning. PloS one 14, 5 (2019), e0217505.
  39. NewsViews: an automated pipeline for creating custom geovisualizations for news. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3005–3014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557228
  40. 4X: A Hybrid Approach for Scaffolding Data Collection and Interest in Low-Effort Participatory Sensing. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 90 (nov 2019), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359192
  41. Datasheets for datasets. Commun. ACM 64, 12 (2021), 86–92.
  42. Erol Gelenbe and Laurence Hey. 2008. Quality of information: An empirical approach. In 2008 5th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems. 730–735. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHSS.2008.4660116
  43. Estimating city-level travel patterns using street imagery: A case study of using Google Street View in Britain. PloS one 13, 5 (2018), e0196521.
  44. Mapping sky, tree, and building view factors of street canyons in a high-density urban environment. Building and Environment 134 (2018), 155–167.
  45. Automatic detection of building typology using deep learning methods on street level images. Building and Environment 177 (2020), 106805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106805
  46. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote sensing of Environment 202 (2017), 18–27.
  47. Spatial modelling and forecasting. In Handbook of Planning Support Science. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  48. Contextual correlates of happiness in European adults. PloS one 13, 1 (2018), e0190387.
  49. Webcams, crowdsourcing, and enhanced crosswalks: Developing a novel method to analyze active transportation. Frontiers in Public Health 4 (2016), 97. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871890/
  50. Model fusion for building type classification from aerial and street view images. Remote Sensing 11, 11 (2019), 1259.
  51. Yujun Hou and Filip Biljecki. 2022. A comprehensive framework for evaluating the quality of street view imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 115 (2022), 103094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.103094
  52. Google Street View assessment of environmental safety features at the scene of pedestrian automobile injury. Journal of trauma and acute care surgery 87, 1 (2019), 82–86.
  53. Peter Jackson. 1985. Urban ethnography. Progress in Human Geography 9, 2 (1985), 157–176.
  54. Levente Juhász and Hartwig H Hochmair. 2016. User contribution patterns and completeness evaluation of Mapillary, a crowdsourced street level photo service. Transactions in GIS 20, 6 (2016), 925–947.
  55. Bill Kastanakis. 2016. Mapbox Cookbook. Packt Publishing Ltd.
  56. Fine-grained walking activity recognition via driving recorder dataset. In 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE, 620–625. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7313199
  57. Shahedul Huq Khandkar. 2009. Open coding. University of Calgary 23 (2009), 2009.
  58. Automatic discovery and geotagging of objects from street view imagery. Remote Sensing 10, 5 (2018), 661.
  59. Take a look around: using street view and satellite images to estimate house prices. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 10, 5 (2019), 1–19.
  60. STAR-CITY: Semantic Traffic Analytics and Reasoning for CITY. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Haifa, Israel) (IUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1145/2557500.2557537
  61. Automated Pavement Distress Detection and Deterioration Analysis Using Street View Map. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 76163–76172. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2989028
  62. Estimating building age from Google street view images using deep learning (short paper). In 10th international conference on geographic information science (GIScience 2018). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik.
  63. GSV2SVF-an interactive GIS tool for sky, tree and building view factor estimation from street view photographs. Building and Environment 168 (2020), 106475.
  64. Mobility Improves Coverage of Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA) (MobiHoc ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1145/1062689.1062728
  65. Toward QoI and Energy-Efficiency in Internet-of-Things Sensory Environments. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing 2, 4 (2014), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2014.2364915
  66. XiaoHang Liu and Julia Griswold. 2009. Pedestrian volume modeling: a case study of San Francisco. Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers (2009), 164–181.
  67. Social sensing: A new approach to understanding our socioeconomic environments. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105, 3 (2015), 512–530.
  68. John R Logan. 2018. Relying on the census in urban social science.
  69. David G Lowe. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International journal of computer vision 60, 2 (2004), 91–110.
  70. The state of mapillary: An exploratory analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9, 1 (2019), 10.
  71. Thomas Macwright. 2022. https://www.placemark.io/
  72. Mapping points of interest through street view imagery and paid crowdsourcing. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 11, 5 (2020), 1–28.
  73. Crowdsourcing street view imagery: A comparison of mapillary and OpenStreetCam. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9, 6 (2020), 341.
  74. CommunityCrit: Inviting the Public to Improve and Evaluate Urban Design Ideas through Micro-Activities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173769
  75. SENTINEL-2 Services Library-efficient way for exploration and exploitation of EO data. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 19502.
  76. Roberta Balstad Miller and Christopher Small. 2003. Cities from space: potential applications of remote sensing in urban environmental research and policy. Environmental Science & Policy 6, 2 (2003), 129–137.
  77. Urban Pulse: Capturing the Rhythm of Cities. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (2017), 791–800. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598585
  78. Urban Mosaic: Visual exploration of streetscapes using large-scale image data. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.
  79. The mapillary vistas dataset for semantic understanding of street scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 4990–4999.
  80. Edith C.-H. Ngai and Per Gunningberg. 2014. Quality-of-information-aware data collection for mobile sensor networks. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 11 (2014), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2013.07.012
  81. Using 164 Million Google Street View Images to Derive Built Environment Predictors of COVID-19 Cases. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, 17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176359
  82. Sidewalk extraction using aerial and street view images. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 49, 1 (2022), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808321995817 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808321995817
  83. Digital privacy: Replacing pedestrians from google street view images. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2012). IEEE, 2889–2893.
  84. D Olanoff. 2013. Inside Google Street View: From Larry Page’s Car To The Depths Of The Grand Canyon. Retrieved July 29 (2013), 2019.
  85. City Explorer: The Design and Evaluation of a Location-Based Community Information System. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300571
  86. Visualization of Pedestrian Density Dynamics Using Data Extracted from Public Webcams. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8, 12 (2019), 559. https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/8/12/559
  87. Meng Qi and Steve Hankey. 2021. Using Street View Imagery to Predict Street-Level Particulate Air Pollution. Environmental Science & Technology 55, 4 (2021), 2695–2704. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05572 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05572 PMID: 33539080.
  88. Visual Analysis of the Air Pollution Problem in Hong Kong. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 6 (2007), 1408–1415. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.70523
  89. Till Quack. 2021. Launching mapillary missions beta. https://blog.mapillary.com/update/2021/12/06/mapillary-missions-beta.html
  90. Lauren H. Rakower. 2011a. Blurred Line: Zooming in on Google Street View and the Global Right to Privacy. Brooklyn Journal of International Law (2011). https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol37/iss1/8
  91. Lauren H Rakower. 2011b. Blurred line: zooming in on Google Street View and the global right to privacy. Brook. J. Int’l L. 37 (2011), 317.
  92. Bushra Rashid and Mubashir Husain Rehmani. 2016. Applications of wireless sensor networks for urban areas: A survey. Journal of network and computer applications 60 (2016), 192–219.
  93. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 779–788.
  94. Incentive Mechanisms for Participatory Sensing: Survey and Research Challenges. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 12, 2, Article 13 (apr 2016), 40 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2888398
  95. Thomas L Saaty. 1988. What is the analytic hierarchy process? In Mathematical models for decision support. Springer, 109–121.
  96. Project Sidewalk: A Web-Based Crowdsourcing Tool for Collecting Sidewalk Accessibility Data At Scale. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300292
  97. Role of built environments in physical activity, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. Circulation 125, 5 (2012), 729–737.
  98. Kinects and human kinetics: A new approach for studying pedestrian behavior. Transportation research part C: Emerging Technologies 48 (2014), 212–228. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X14002289
  99. Aaron Shapiro. 2018. Street-level: Google Street View’s abstraction by datafication. new media & society 20, 3 (2018), 1201–1219.
  100. Przemysław Skurowski and Marcin Paszkuta. 2018. Saliency map based analysis for prediction of car driving difficulty in Google street view scenes. In AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1978. AIP Publishing LLC, 110003.
  101. Christopher Slobogin. 2002. Public privacy: camera surveillance of public places and the right to anonymity. Miss. lJ 72 (2002), 213. https://ir.vanderbilt.edu/bitstream/handle/1803/5752/Public%20Privacy.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  102. Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 3645–3650.
  103. Exploring value-of-information-based approaches to support effective communications in tactical networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 53, 10 (2015), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2015.7295461
  104. Andrew Thirlwell and Ognjen Arandjelović. 2020. Big data driven detection of trees in suburban scenes using visual spectrum eye level photography. Sensors 20, 11 (2020), 3051.
  105. Exploring Traffic Features on Google Street View Images. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Applications (Shenzhen, China) (WCNA 2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 230–234. https://doi.org/10.1145/3180496.3180638
  106. Privacy Protection in Street-View Panoramas using Depth and Multi-View Imagery. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1903.11532
  107. John Underkoffler and Hiroshi Ishii. 1999. Urp: A Luminous-Tangible Workbench for Urban Planning and Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA) (CHI ’99). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 386–393. https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303114
  108. Twitch crowdsourcing: crowd contributions in short bursts of time. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3645–3654. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556996
  109. Christophe Vandeviver. 2014a. Applying google maps and google street view in criminological research. Crime Science 3, 1 (2014), 1–16.
  110. Christophe Vandeviver. 2014b. Applying Google Maps and Google Street View in criminological research. Crime Science 3 (2014), 1–16.
  111. Differences in physical environmental characteristics between adolescents’ actual and shortest cycling routes: a study using a Google Street View-based audit. International journal of health geographics 17, 1 (2018), 1–15.
  112. Cédric Villani and Cédric Villani. 2009. The wasserstein distances. Optimal Transport: Old and New (2009), 93–111.
  113. Manhole detection using image processing on google street view imagery. In 2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT). IEEE, 684–688.
  114. Deep Learning for Content-Based Image Retrieval: A Comprehensive Study. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia (Orlando, Florida, USA) (MM ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1145/2647868.2654948
  115. Movement-assisted sensor deployment. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 5, 6 (2006), 640–652.
  116. Urban greenery and mental wellbeing in adults: Cross-sectional mediation analyses on multiple pathways across different greenery measures. Environmental research 176 (2019), 108535.
  117. Relationship between eye-level greenness and cycling frequency around metro stations in Shenzhen, China: A big data approach. Sustainable Cities and Society 59 (2020), 102201.
  118. Urban Perception of Commercial Activeness from Satellite Images and Streetscapes. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018 (Lyon, France) (WWW ’18). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 647–654. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3186581
  119. Competitive priorities in operations management. Decision Sciences 29, 4 (1998), 1035–1046.
  120. City-scale vehicle tracking and traffic flow estimation using low frame-rate traffic cameras. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 602–610.
  121. Deep learning for automatically detecting sidewalk accessibility problems using streetscape imagery. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 196–209.
  122. The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Models. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 1 (2020), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934619
  123. Sean White and Steven Feiner. 2009. SiteLens: Situated Visualization Techniques for Urban Site Visits. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1117–1120. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518871
  124. Learning When Agents Can Talk to Drivers Using the INAGT Dataset and Multisensor Fusion. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 5, 3 (2021), 1–28.
  125. Detecting Trees in Street Images via Deep Learning With Attention Module. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 69, 8 (2020), 5395–5406. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2019.2958580
  126. Age of information: An introduction and survey. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 39, 5 (2021), 1183–1210.
  127. Urban Commerce Distribution Analysis Based on Street View and Deep Learning. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 162841–162849. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2951294
  128. The visual quality of streets: A human-centred continuous measurement based on machine learning algorithms and street view images. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 46, 8 (2019), 1439–1457. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319828734 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319828734
  129. Janine Yoong. 2018. Vermont opens up 5 years of road imagery for improving transportation services. https://blog.mapillary.com/update/2018/03/28/vermont-opens-up-5-years-of-road-imagery.html
  130. A fast approach for large-scale Sky View Factor estimation using street view images. Building and Environment 135 (2018), 74–84.
  131. Visualizing Mobility of Public Transportation System. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 12 (2014), 1833–1842. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346893
  132. Social sensing from street-level imagery: A case study in learning spatio-temporal urban mobility patterns. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 153 (2019), 48–58.
  133. Automatic latent street type discovery from web open data. Information Systems 92 (2020), 101536.
  134. Walking down a different path: route recommendation based on visual and facility based diversity. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018. 171–174.
  135. Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science? arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03514 (2023).

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now

Whiteboard

Paper to Video (Beta)

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up