Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 189 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 207 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 451 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The equivalence of smooth and synthetic notions of timelike sectional curvature bounds (2403.18077v3)

Published 26 Mar 2024 in math.DG

Abstract: Timelike sectional curvature bounds play an important role in spacetime geometry, both for the understanding of classical smooth spacetimes and for the study of Lorentzian (pre-)length spaces introduced in \cite{kunzinger2018lorentzian}. In the smooth setting, a bound on the sectional curvature of timelike planes can be formulated via the Riemann curvature tensor. In the synthetic setting, bounds are formulated by comparing various geometric configurations to the corresponding ones in constant curvature spaces. The first link between these notions in the Lorentzian context was established in \cite{harris1982triangle}, which was instrumental in the proof of powerful results in spacetime geometry \cite{beem1985toponogov, beem1985decomposition, galloway2018existence}. For general semi-Riemannian manifolds, the equivalence between sectional curvature bounds and synthetic bounds was established in \cite{alexander2008triangle}, however in this approach the sectional curvatures of both timelike and spacelike planes have to be considered. In this article, we fill a gap in the literature by proving the full equivalence between sectional curvature bounds on timelike planes and synthetic timelike bounds on strongly causal spacetimes. As an essential tool, we establish Hessian comparison for the time separation and signed distance functions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. S. Alexander and R. Bishop. A cone splitting theorem for Alexandrov spaces. Pac. J. Math., 218:1–15, 2005.
  2. Lorentz and semi-Riemannian spaces with Alexandrov curvature bounds. Communications in Analysis and Geometry, 16(2):251–282, 2008.
  3. Generalized cones as Lorentzian length spaces: Causality, curvature, and singularity theorems. Communications in Analysis and Geometry, to appear, arXiv:1909.09575, 2024.
  4. Comparison theorems for Lorentzian length spaces with lower timelike curvature bounds. General Relativity and Gravitation, 54(9):107, 2022.
  5. R. Bartnik. Remarks on cosmological spacetimes and constant mean curvature surfaces. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 117(4):615–624, 1988.
  6. A Toponogov splitting theorem for Lorentzian manifolds. In Global Differential Geometry and Global Analysis 1984, pages 1–13. Springer, 1985.
  7. Decomposition theorems for Lorentzian manifolds with nonpositive curvature. Journal of Differential Geometry, 22(1):29–42, 1985.
  8. A Toponogov globalisation result for Lorentzian length spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12733, 2023.
  9. On curvature bounds in Lorentzian length spaces. Submitted, arXiv:2309.12062, 2023.
  10. Alexandrov’s patchwork and the Bonnet-Myers theorem for Lorentzian length spaces. Submitted, arXiv:2302.11615, 2023.
  11. The splitting theorem for globally hyperbolic Lorentzian length spaces with non-negative timelike curvature. Letters in Mathematical Physics, 113(2):48, 2023.
  12. T. Beran and F. Rott. Gluing constructions for Lorentzian length spaces. Manuscripta Mathematica, pages 1–44, 2023.
  13. T. Beran and C. Sämann. Hyperbolic angles in Lorentzian length spaces and timelike curvature bounds. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 2:1–58, 2023.
  14. A Course in Metric Geometry, volume 33. American Mathematical Soc., 2001.
  15. J. Cheeger and T. H. Colding. Lower bounds on Ricci curvature and the almost rigidity of warped products. Annals of Mathematics, 144(1):189–237, 1996.
  16. J. Cheeger and D. Gromoll. On the structure of complete manifolds of nonnegative curvature. Annals of Mathematics, 96(3):413–443, 1972.
  17. G. J. Galloway and E. Ling. Existence of CMC Cauchy surfaces from a spacetime curvature condition. General Relativity and Gravitation, 50:1–7, 2018.
  18. Inextendibility of spacetimes and Lorentzian length spaces. Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry, 55(1):133–147, 2019.
  19. S. Harris. A triangle comparison theorem for Lorentz manifolds. Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 31(3):289–308, 1982.
  20. M. Kirchberger. Lorentzian comparison geometry. Master’s thesis, University of Vienna, 2018. https://phaidra.univie.ac.at/open/o:1351312.
  21. M. Kunzinger and C. Sämann. Lorentzian length spaces. Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry, 54(3):399–447, 2018.
  22. E. Minguzzi and S. Suhr. Lorentzian metric spaces and their Gromov-Hausdorff convergence. arXiv:2209.14384, 2022.
  23. B. O’Neill. Semi-Riemannian geometry with applications to relativity. Academic press, 1983.
  24. F. Rott. Gluing of Lorentzian length spaces and the causal ladder. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 40(17), 2023.
  25. J.-H. Treude. Ricci curvature comparison in Riemannian and Lorentzian geometry. Master’s thesis, University of Freiburg, 2011. https://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/8405.
  26. Volume comparison for hypersurfaces in Lorentzian manifolds and singularity theorems. Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry, 43:233–251, 2013.
Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: