Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 63 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 88 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 152 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 325 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 32 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The inclusive Synthetic Control Method (2403.17624v2)

Published 26 Mar 2024 in econ.EM

Abstract: We introduce the inclusive synthetic control method (iSCM), a modification of synthetic control methods that includes units in the donor pool potentially affected, directly or indirectly, by an intervention. This method is ideal for situations where including treated units in the donor pool is essential or where donor units may experience spillover effects. The iSCM is straightforward to implement with most synthetic control estimators. As an empirical illustration, we re-estimate the causal effect of German reunification on GDP per capita, accounting for spillover effects from West Germany to Austria.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. Abadie, A. (2021). Using synthetic controls: Feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. Journal of Economic Literature 59(2), 391–425.
  2. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of california’s tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105(490), 493–505.
  3. Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. American Journal of Political Science 59(2), 495–510.
  4. The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the basque country. American Economic Review 93(1), 113–132.
  5. A penalized synthetic control estimator for disaggregated data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 116(536), 1817–1834.
  6. Robust synthetic control. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 19(1), 802–852.
  7. The augmented synthetic control method. Journal of the American Statistical Association 116(536), 1789–1803.
  8. Synthetic controls with staggered adoption. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 84(2), 351–381.
  9. Estimation and Inference for Synthetic Control Methods with Spillover Effects. Papers 1902.07343, arXiv.org.
  10. Industrial policy evaluation in the presence of spillovers. Small Business Economics 49(3), 671–686.
  11. An exact and robust conformal inference method for counterfactual and synthetic controls. Journal of the American Statistical Association 116(536), 1849–1864.
  12. Doudchenko, N. and G. W. Imbens (2017). Balancing, regression, difference-in-differences and synthetic control methods: A synthesis. arXiv:1610.07748.
  13. Synthetic controls with imperfect pretreatment fit. Quantitative Economics 12(4), 1197–1221.
  14. Synthetic control method: Inference, sensitivity analysis and confidence sets. Journal of Causal Inference 6(2), 1–26.
  15. Identification and estimation of treatment and interference effects in observational studies on networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association 116(534), 901–918.
  16. Austria, german unification, and european integration: A brief historical background. working paper-Cold War International History Project.
  17. Regional policy evaluation: interactive fixed effects and synthetic controls. Review of Economics and Statistics 98(3), 535–551.
  18. Synthetic control group methods in the presence of interference: The direct and spillover effects of light rail on neighborhood retail activity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.05027.
  19. A framework for separating individual-level treatment effects from spillover effects. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1–15.
  20. Combining matching and synthetic control to tradeoff biases from extrapolation and interpolation. Journal of the American statistical association 116(536), 1804–1816.
  21. Li, K. T. (2019). Statistical inference for average treatment effects estimated by synthetic control methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1–16.
  22. Powell, D. (2018). Imperfect Synthetic Controls: Did the Massachusetts Health Care Reform Save Lives? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
  23. Vazquez-Bare, G. (2022). Identification and estimation of spillover effects in randomized experiments. Journal of Econometrics.
  24. Xu, Y. (2017). Generalized synthetic control method: Causal inference with interactive fixed effects models. Political Analysis 25(1), 57–76.
  25. Asymptotic properties of the synthetic control method.
Citations (12)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 4 posts and received 5 likes.