Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Persuasion or Insulting? Unpacking Discursive Strategies of Gender Debate in Everyday Feminism in China (2403.15985v1)

Published 24 Mar 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Speaking out for women's daily needs on social media has become a crucial form of everyday feminism in China. Gender debate naturally intertwines with such feminist advocacy, where users in opposite stances discuss gender-related issues through intense discourse. The complexities of gender debate necessitate a systematic understanding of discursive strategies for achieving effective gender communication that balances civility and constructiveness. To address this problem, we adopted a mixed-methods study to navigate discursive strategies in gender debate, focusing on 38,636 posts and 187,539 comments from two representative cases in China. Through open coding, we identified a comprehensive taxonomy of linguistic strategies in gender debate, capturing five overarching themes including derogation, gender distinction, intensification, mitigation, and cognizance guidance. Further, we applied regression analysis to unveil these strategies' correlations with user participation and response, illustrating the tension between debating tactics and public engagement. We discuss design implications to facilitate feminist advocacy on social media.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (142)
  1. Protibadi: A platform for fighting sexual harassment in urban Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2695–2704.
  2. Jessica Alexandra Aiston. 2022. Argumentation strategies in an online male separatist community. Lancaster University (United Kingdom).
  3. Variance inflation factor: as a condition for the inclusion of suppressor variable (s) in regression analysis. Open journal of statistics 5, 07 (2015), 754.
  4. Moderation as Empowerment: Creating and Managing Women-Only Digital Safe Spaces. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1–36.
  5. Social support, reciprocity, and anonymity in responses to sexual abuse disclosures on social media. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 25, 5 (2018), 1–35.
  6. The “nasty effect:” Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of computer-mediated communication 19, 3 (2014), 373–387.
  7. Toxic talk: How online incivility can undermine perceptions of media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 30, 1 (2018), 156–168.
  8. Kristin L Anderson and Jill Cermele. 2014. Public/Private language aggression against women: Tweeting rage and intimate partner violence. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2, 2 (2014), 274–293.
  9. Anna B\kaczkowska. 2021. “You’re too thick to change the station”–Impoliteness, insults and responses to insults on Twitter. Topics in Linguistics 22, 2 (2021), 62–84.
  10. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1301–1310.
  11. Shame on Who? Experimentally Reducing Shame During Political Arguments on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1–18.
  12. Someone is wrong on the internet: Having hard conversations in online spaces. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1–22.
  13. Joe Bellon. 2000. A research-based justification for debate across the curriculum. Argumentation and Advocacy 36, 3 (2000), 161–175.
  14. Jonah Berger and Katherine L Milkman. 2012. What makes online content viral? Journal of marketing research 49, 2 (2012), 192–205.
  15. Joseph M Bessette. 1980. Deliberative democracy: The majority principle in republican government. How democratic is the constitution? (1980).
  16. Kamla Bhasin and Nighat Said Khan. 1999. Feminism and its relevance in South Asia. Women Unlimited.
  17. Porismita Borah. 2014. Does it matter where you read the news story? Interaction of incivility and news frames in the political blogosphere. Communication Research 41, 6 (2014), 809–827.
  18. Patricia Bou-Franch. 2014. An introduction to language aggression against women. Journal of language aggression and conflict 2, 2 (2014), 177–181.
  19. Patricia Bou-Franch and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2014. Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube. Journal of Pragmatics 73 (2014), 19–36.
  20. Shelley Budgeon. 2019. The resonance of moderate feminism and the gendered relations of austerity. Gender, Work & Organization 26, 8 (2019), 1138–1155.
  21. The effect of the# MeToo movement on political engagement and ambition in 2018. Political Research Quarterly 73, 4 (2020), 926–941.
  22. Nicoletta Cavazza and Margherita Guidetti. 2014. Swearing in political discourse: Why vulgarity works. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 33, 5 (2014), 537–547.
  23. From# MeToo to# TimesUp: Identifying next steps in sexual harassment research in the organizational sciences. , 551–566 pages.
  24. Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 785–794.
  25. Yunsi Chen and Dezhuang Hu. 2021. Gender norms and marriage satisfaction: Evidence from China. China Economic Review 68 (2021), 101627.
  26. Exploring commenting behavior in the COVID-19 super-topic on Weibo. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–7.
  27. Anyone can become a troll: Causes of trolling behavior in online discussions. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 1217–1230.
  28. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078 (2014).
  29. From# MeToo to# TimesUp in health care: can a culture of accountability end inequity and harassment? The Lancet 393, 10171 (2019), 499–502.
  30. The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 9 (2021), e2023301118.
  31. Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of communication 64, 4 (2014), 658–679.
  32. Caitlin Cosper. 2022. Patterns of conflict speech and young adult feminist identity construction on Tumblr. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10, 1 (2022), 85–110.
  33. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge university press.
  34. Yurong Cui. 2022. Comparative Research of feminist content on Tiktok and Weibo. In 2021 International Conference on Social Development and Media Communication (SDMC 2021). Atlantis Press, 387–393.
  35. Pre-training with whole word masking for chinese bert. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 29 (2021), 3504–3514.
  36. Civil and uncivil actors for a degrowth society. Journal of Civil Society 9, 2 (2013), 212–224.
  37. The gendered geography of contributions to OpenStreetMap: Complexities in self-focus bias. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.
  38. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018).
  39. ” The Personal is Political” Hackathons as Feminist Consciousness Raising. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1–23.
  40. Alice Echols. 1989. Daring to be bad: Radical feminism in America, 1967-1975. Vol. 3. U of Minnesota Press.
  41. Eleonora Esposito and Sole Alba Zollo. 2021. “How dare you call her a pig, I know several pigs who would be upset if they knew” A multimodal critical discursive approach to online misogyny against UK MPs on YouTube. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9, 1 (2021), 47–75.
  42. The” shut the f** k up” phenomenon: Characterizing incivility in open source code review discussions. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1–35.
  43. Casey Fiesler. 2019. Ethical considerations for research involving (speculative) public data. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, GROUP (2019), 1–13.
  44. Shulamith Firestone. 2015. The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. Verso Books.
  45. Uwe Flick. 2022. An introduction to qualitative research. An introduction to qualitative research (2022), 1–100.
  46. Imagining intersectional futures: Feminist approaches in CSCW. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 387–393.
  47. Reclaiming stigmatized narratives: The networked disclosure landscape of# MeToo. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1–30.
  48. How do text characteristics impact user engagement in social media posts: Modeling content readability, length, and hashtags number in Facebook. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights 2, 1 (2022), 100067.
  49. Adding insult to injury: Development and initial validation of the Partner-Directed Insults Scale. Violence and Victims 21, 6 (2006), 691–706.
  50. Xiao Han. 2018. Searching for an online space for feminism? The Chinese feminist group Gender Watch Women’s Voice and its changing approaches to online misogyny. Feminist Media Studies 18, 4 (2018), 734–749.
  51. Can women break the glass ceiling? an analysis of# MeToo hashtagged posts on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. 653–656.
  52. Searching for safety online: Managing” trolling” in a feminist forum. The information society 18, 5 (2002), 371–384.
  53. Joseph M Hilbe. 2011. Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press.
  54. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation 9, 8 (1997), 1735–1780.
  55. Defying Out-group Impoliteness: An Analysis of Users’ Defensive Strategies in Disputing Online Criticisms. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 20, 1 (2020).
  56. Exploring lightweight interventions at posting time to reduce the sharing of misinformation on social media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1–42.
  57. Brevity is the soul of Twitter: The constraint affordance and political discussion. Journal of Communication 69, 4 (2019), 345–372.
  58. Online hatred of women¡? br?¿ in the Incels. me forum: Linguistic analysis and automatic detection. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7, 2 (2019), 240–268.
  59. SWSR: A Chinese dataset and lexicon for online sexism detection. Online Social Networks and Media 27 (2022), 100182.
  60. Shan Jiang and Christo Wilson. 2018. Linguistic signals under misinformation and fact-checking: Evidence from user comments on social media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–23.
  61. How HCI talks about sexuality: discursive strategies, blind spots, and opportunities for future research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 695–704.
  62. Maura Kelly. 2015. Feminist identity, collective action, and individual resistance among contemporary US feminists. In Women’s Studies International Forum, Vol. 48. Elsevier, 81–92.
  63. From online political posting to mansplaining: The gender gap and social media in political discussion. Social Science Computer Review 39, 2 (2021), 197–210.
  64. Our flaws are more human than yours: Ingroup bias in humanizing negative characteristics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38, 3 (2012), 283–295.
  65. Introduction to special issue: Exploring the emergence of moderate feminism (s) in contemporary organizations.
  66. Weijia Li. 2020. Collective struggle: A case study of Chinese grassroots feminism in the digital age. (2020).
  67. Jiaxun Liu. 2023. A Framing Analysis of the Stigma on Chinese Internet towards Feminism: A Case Study on ”Yang Li Incident” on Weibo. In The 3rd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries (ICEIPI 2022). EWA Publishing, 464–471.
  68. Mengmeng Liu. 2016. The development of Chinese feminism on weibo. (2016).
  69. Ting Liu et al. 2008. Cyberactivism in the Women’s Movement: A Comparison of Feminist Practices by Women Organising in Mainland and Hong Kong. In Chinese Women and Cyberspace. Amsterdam University Press.
  70. Fake it till you make it: Fishing for Catfishes. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2017. 497–504.
  71. Opinion conflicts: An effective route to detect incivility in Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–27.
  72. Karla Mantilla. 2013. Gendertrolling: Misogyny adapts to new media. Feminist studies 39, 2 (2013), 563–570.
  73. Chengting Mao. 2020. Feminist activism via social media in China. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies 26, 2 (2020), 245–258.
  74. Slowing it Down: Towards Facilitating Interpersonal Mindfulness in Online Polarizing Conversations Over Social Media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CSCW1 (2023), 1–27.
  75. Mary L McHugh. 2012. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia medica 22, 3 (2012), 276–282.
  76. Marshall McLuhan. 2017. The medium is the message. In Communication theory. Routledge, 390–402.
  77. An image of society: Gender and racial representation and impact in image search results for occupations. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1–23.
  78. From her story, to our story: Digital storytelling as public engagement around abortion rights advocacy in Ireland. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.
  79. Weiyu Mo. 2022. A Study of the Phenomenon of “Extreme Feminist” Groups on Sina Weibo. In 2022 6th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences (ISEMSS 2022). Atlantis Press, 1332–1339.
  80. Parsing the’Me’in# MeToo: Sexual Harassment, Social Media, and Justice Infrastructures. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1–34.
  81. Chantal Mouffe. 1999. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social research (1999), 745–758.
  82. Demographic representation and collective storytelling in the me too Twitter hashtag activism movement. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1–28.
  83. Christopher Mueller. 2016. Positive Feedback Loops: Sarcasm and the Pseudo-Argument in Reddit Communities. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics 16, 2 (2016), 84–97.
  84. Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds. Nature Human Behaviour 2, 2 (2018), 126–132.
  85. Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler. 2010. When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior 32, 2 (2010), 303–330.
  86. Pairwise multi-class document classification for semantic relations between wikipedia articles. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020. 127–136.
  87. Twitter versus Facebook: Comparing incivility, impoliteness, and deliberative attributes. New media & society 20, 9 (2018), 3400–3419.
  88. Zizi Papacharissi. 2004. Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New media & society 6, 2 (2004), 259–283.
  89. ” How over is it?” Understanding the Incel Community on YouTube. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1–25.
  90. Sarah Pedersen. 2021. Practical, everyday feminism: mothers, politicians, and Mumsnet. Women’s history review 30, 3 (2021), 509–519.
  91. Altman Yuzhu Peng. 2022. Digital nationalism versus gender politics in post-reform China: Gender-issue debates on Zhihu. Global Media and Communication 18, 3 (2022), 281–299.
  92. A feminist reading of China’s digital public sphere. Springer.
  93. Urszula M Pruchniewska. 2019. Everyday feminism in the digital era: Gender, the fourth wave, and social media affordances. Temple University.
  94. Microblogging after a major disaster in China: a case study of the 2010 Yushu earthquake. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 25–34.
  95. Mapping# MeToo: A synthesis review of digital feminist research across social media platforms. New media & society 23, 6 (2021), 1700–1720.
  96. Martin Reisigl. 2017. The discourse-historical approach. In The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. Routledge, 44–59.
  97. Fostering civil discourse online: Linguistic behavior in comments of# metoo articles across political perspectives. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–28.
  98. Eugenia Ha Rim Rho and Melissa Mazmanian. 2019. Hashtag burnout? a control experiment investigating how political hashtags shape reactions to news content. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1–25.
  99. Michelle Rodino-Colocino. 2018. Me too,# MeToo: Countering cruelty with empathy. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 15, 1 (2018), 96–100.
  100. Ian Rowe. 2015. Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, communication & society 18, 2 (2015), 121–138.
  101. Srila Roy. 2013. Feminist ‘radicality’and ‘moderation’in times of crises and change. The Sociological Review 61 (2013), 100–118.
  102. Christos Sagredos and Evelin Nikolova. 2022. ‘Slut I hate you’ A critical discourse analysis of gendered conflict on YouTube. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10, 1 (2022), 169–196.
  103. Virginia Sapiro. 1999. Considering political civility historically: A case study of the United States. In Annual Meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, Amsterdam. 12–13.
  104. Automated Identification of Toxic Code Reviews Using ToxiCR. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (2023).
  105. Intersectional HCI: Engaging identity through gender, race, and class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 5412–5427.
  106. Julia Schuster. 2017. Why the personal remained political: comparing second and third wave perspectives on everyday feminism. Social Movement Studies 16, 6 (2017), 647–659.
  107. Geeta Shroff. 2010. Towards a design model for women’s empowerment in the developing world. Unpublished Master’s Dissertation. Pittsburg: Carnegie Mellon University (2010).
  108. Sarah Sobieraj. 2018. Bitch, slut, skank, cunt: Patterned resistance to women’s visibility in digital publics. Information, Communication & Society 21, 11 (2018), 1700–1714.
  109. Toxic social media: Affective polarization after feminist protests. Social Media+ Society 8, 2 (2022), 20563051221098343.
  110. Design within a patriarchal society: Opportunities and challenges in designing for rural women in bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
  111. Jenny Sundén and Susanna Paasonen. 2018. Shameless hags and tolerance whores: Feminist resistance and the affective circuits of online hate. Feminist media studies 18, 4 (2018), 643–656.
  112. Henri Tajfel and John C Turner. 2004. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Political psychology. Psychology Press, 276–293.
  113. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational identity: A reader 56, 65 (1979), 9780203505984–16.
  114. Winning arguments: Interaction dynamics and persuasion strategies in good-faith online discussions. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on world wide web. 613–624.
  115. A bad workman blames his tweets: The consequences of citizens’ uncivil Twitter use when interacting with party candidates. Journal of communication 66, 6 (2016), 1007–1031.
  116. Samantha C Thrift. 2014. # YesAllWomen as feminist meme event. Feminist media studies 14, 6 (2014), 1090–1092.
  117. Non-literal Communication in Chinese Internet Spaces: A Case Study of Fishing. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW1 (2022), 1–32.
  118. Global Times. 2023. More toilets for female, says China’s new law draft, winning applause from both men and women in the country. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202112/1243127.shtml. Accessed: 2023-08-28.
  119. Sixth Tone. 2020. Silent No More: How China’s Domestic Abuse Victims Spoke Out. https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1005032. Accessed: 2023-08-28.
  120. Sixth Tone. 2021. Weibo Shuts Down User Accounts for ‘Gender Opposition’. https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1009165. Accessed: 2023-08-28.
  121. W Ben Towne and James D Herbsleb. 2012. Design considerations for online deliberation systems. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 9, 1 (2012), 97–115.
  122. Learning from and with menstrupedia: Towards menstrual health education in India. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–20.
  123. Charikleia Tzanakou and Ruth Pearce. 2019. Moderate feminism within or against the neoliberal university? The example of Athena SWAN. Gender, Work & Organization 26, 8 (2019), 1191–1211.
  124. Bin Wang and Catherine Driscoll. 2019. Chinese feminists on social media: Articulating different voices, building strategic alliances. Continuum 33, 1 (2019), 1–15.
  125. Rui Wang. 2022. Evolution of ”Men as Breadwinners, Women as Homemakers” in Late Qing Dynasty and Early Republican Era (in Chinese). Forum on Folk Culture 6 (2022), 77–84.
  126. Weibo. 2020. #Weibo 2020 User Development Report# (Chinese). https://data.weibo.com/report/file/view?download_name=4a774760-40fe-5714-498e-865d87a738fe&file-type=.pdf. Accessed: 2023-12-07.
  127. Weibo. 2023a. #Ensure that there are more women’s restrooms than men’s restrooms# (Chinese). https://m.s.weibo.com/vtopic/detail_new?click_from=searchpc&q=%23%E7%A1%AE%E4%BF%9D%E5%A5%B3%E5%8E%95%E4%BD%8D%E5%A4%9A%E4%BA%8E%E7%94%B7%E5%8E%95%E4%BD%8D%23. Accessed: 2023-08-28.
  128. Weibo. 2023b. #Sichuan University responds again to the conversion of some men’s restrooms into women’s restrooms# (Chinese). https://m.s.weibo.com/vtopic/detail_new?click_from=searchpc&q=%23%E5%9B%9B%E5%B7%9D%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%A6%E5%86%8D%E5%9B%9E%E5%BA%94%E9%83%A8%E5%88%86%E7%94%B7%E5%8E%95%E6%94%B9%E5%A5%B3%E5%8E%95%23. Accessed: 2023-08-28.
  129. Weibo. 2023c. #Why do we need more women’s toilets# (Chinese). https://m.s.weibo.com/vtopic/detail_new?click_from=searchpc&q=%23%E4%B8%BA%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%88%91%E4%BB%AC%E9%9C%80%E8%A6%81%E6%9B%B4%E5%A4%9A%E7%9A%84%E5%A5%B3%E5%8E%95%E6%89%80%23. Accessed: 2023-08-28.
  130. Weibo. 2023d. #Women complain of not being able to purchase sanitary pads while menstruating on high-speed trains# (Chinese). https://m.s.weibo.com/vtopic/detail_new?click_from=searchpc&q=%23%E5%A5%B3%E5%AD%90%E7%A7%B0%E9%AB%98%E9%93%81%E4%B8%8A%E6%9D%A5%E4%BE%8B%E5%81%87%E4%B9%B0%E4%B8%8D%E5%88%B0%E5%8D%AB%E7%94%9F%E5%B7%BE%23. Accessed: 2023-08-28.
  131. Retributive and restorative justice. Law and human behavior 32, 5 (2008), 375.
  132. Wikipedia. 1960s. Radical feminism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_feminism#CITEREFWillis1984. Accessed: 2023-08-28.
  133. Wikipedia. 2021. 2022 Tangshan restaurant attack. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Tangshan_restaurant_attack. Accessed: 2023-08-28.
  134. Ellen Willis. 1984. Radical feminism and feminist radicalism. Social text 9/10 (1984), 91–118.
  135. Angela Xiao Wu and Yige Dong. 2019. What is made-in-China feminism (s)? Gender discontent and class friction in post-socialist China. Critical Asian Studies 51, 4 (2019), 471–492.
  136. Tao Xiao. 2023. WeiboSuperSpider. https://github.com/Python3Spiders/WeiboSuperSpider. Accessed: 2023-08-28.
  137. Dezhi Yang. 2022. Research on the Causes of “Feminism” Becoming Negative on Chinese Weibo. In 2022 8th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2022). Atlantis Press, 367–370.
  138. What Is “Rural Feminism”? A Computer-Assisted Analysis of Popular Antifeminist Discourses in Chinese Social Media. Social Media+ Society 9, 2 (2023), 20563051231177952.
  139. Siyuan Yin and Yu Sun. 2021. Intersectional digital feminism: Assessing the participation politics and impact of the MeToo movement in China. Feminist Media Studies 21, 7 (2021), 1176–1192.
  140. Li Yutong. 2023. Hostility between men and women on Chinese social media: a content analysis of Sina Weibo with word frequency analysis and topic modeling. (2023).
  141. Ming Zhang and Chi Zhang. 2023. Reflections on the availability of menstrual products, menstruation taboos, and gender binaries in China. International Feminist Journal of Politics 25, 1 (2023), 129–144.
  142. Shixin Ivy Zhang. 2021. Mediatization of conflict in the social media era: A case study of Sino-Indian border crisis in 2017. Journalism 22, 10 (2021), 2618–2636.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now

Whiteboard

Paper to Video (Beta)

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up for Free

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

Explore Trending Papers

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube