Fisher Information Approach for Masking the Sensing Plan: Applications in Multifunction Radars (2403.15966v1)
Abstract: How to design a Markov Decision Process (MDP) based radar controller that makes small sacrifices in performance to mask its sensing plan from an adversary? The radar controller purposefully minimizes the Fisher information of its emissions so that an adversary cannot identify the controller's model parameters accurately. Unlike classical open loop statistical inference, where the Fisher information serves as a lower bound for the achievable covariance, this paper employs the Fisher information as a design constraint for a closed loop radar controller to mask its sensing plan. We analytically derive a closed-form expression for the determinant of the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) pertaining to the parameters of the MDP-based controller. Subsequently, we constrain the MDP with respect to the determinant of the FIM. Numerical results show that the introduction of minor perturbations to the MDP's transition kernel and the total operation cost can reduce the Fisher Information of the emissions. Consequently, this reduction amplifies the variability in policy and transition kernel estimation errors, thwarting the adversary's accuracy in estimating the controller's sensing plan.
- S. Haykin, “Adaptive radar: evolution to cognitive radar,” in IEEE International Symposium on Phased Array Systems and Technology, 2003., 2003, pp. 613–.
- V. Krishnamurthy and D. V. Djonin, “Optimal threshold policies for multivariate pomdps in radar resource management,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 3954–3969, 2009.
- E. Selvi, R. M. Buehrer, A. Martone, and K. Sherbondy, “Reinforcement learning for adaptable bandwidth tracking radars,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 3904–3921, 2020.
- R. Klemm, U. Nickel, C. Gierull, P. Lombardo, H. Griffiths, W. Koch et al., “Novel radar techniques and applications volume 1: real aperture array radar, imaging radar, and passive and multistatic radar,” SciTech, Tech. Rep., 2017.
- ——, “Novel radar techniques and applications volume 2: waveform diversity and cognitive radar, and target tracking and data fusion,” SciTech, Tech. Rep., 2017.
- N. Visnevski, V. Krishnamurthy, A. Wang, and S. Haykin, “Syntactic modeling and signal processing of multifunction radars: A stochastic context-free grammar approach,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 1000–1025, 2007.
- A. Wang and V. Krishnamurthy, “Signal interpretation of multifunction radars: Modeling and statistical signal processing with stochastic context free grammar,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1106–1119, 2008.
- J. Bao, Y. Li, M. Zhu, and S. Wang, “Online parameter estimation and change point detection for multi-function radar pulse sequence based on the bayesian non-parametric hmm,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04407, 2023.
- A. Charlish, F. Hoffmann, C. Degen, and I. Schlangen, “The development from adaptive to cognitive radar resource management,” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 8–19, 2020.
- J. Wintenby and V. Krishnamurthy, “Hierarchical resource management in adaptive airborne surveillance radars,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 401–420, 2006.
- W. Blair, G. Watson, T. Kirubarajan, and Y. Bar-Shalom, “Benchmark for radar allocation and tracking in ecm,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1097–1114, 1998.
- J. Dai, J. Yan, S. Zhou, P. Wang, B. Jiu, and H. Liu, “Sensor selection for multi-target tracking in phased array radar network under hostile environment,” in 2020 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf20), 2020, pp. 1–5.
- W. Jiang, Y. Ren, and Y. Wang, “Improving anti-jamming decision-making strategies for cognitive radar via multi-agent deep reinforcement learning,” Digital Signal Processing, vol. 135, p. 103952, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051200423000477
- C. E. Thornton, R. Michael Buehrer, and A. F. Martone, “Constrained online learning to mitigate distortion effects in pulse-agile cognitive radar,” in 2021 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf21), 2021, pp. 1–6.
- W. W. Howard, A. F. Martone, and R. M. Buehrer, “Adversarial multi-player bandits for cognitive radar networks,” in 2022 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf22), 2022, pp. 1–6.
- B. Kang, V. Krishnamnurthy, K. Pattanayak, S. Gogineni, and M. Rangaswamy, “Smart interference signal design to a cognitive radar,” in 2023 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf23), 2023, pp. 1–6.
- C. Zhang, L. Wang, R. Jiang, J. Hu, and S. Xu, “Radar jamming decision-making in cognitive electronic warfare: A review,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 11 383–11 403, 2023.
- Q. Peng, P. C. Cosman, and L. B. Milstein, “Spoofing or jamming: Performance analysis of a tactical cognitive radio adversary,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 903–911, 2011.
- Q. Zhang, K. Liu, Y. Xia, and A. Ma, “Optimal stealthy deception attack against cyber-physical systems,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 3963–3972, 2020.
- M. O. Karabag, M. Ornik, and U. Topcu, “Deception in supervisory control,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 738–753, 2022.
- K. Pattanayak, V. Krishnamurthy, and C. Berry, “How can a cognitive radar mask its cognition?” in ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2022, pp. 5897–5901.
- A. Jain and V. Krishnamurthy, “Controlling federated learning for covertness,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08825, 2023.
- Y. Savas, M. Ornik, M. Cubuktepe, M. O. Karabag, and U. Topcu, “Entropy maximization for markov decision processes under temporal logic constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1552–1567, 2020.
- M. O. Karabag, M. Ornik, and U. Topcu, “Least inferable policies for markov decision processes,” in 2019 American Control Conference (ACC), 2019, pp. 1224–1231.
- J. Takeuchi, “Fisher information determinant and stochastic complexity for markov models,” in 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, 2009, pp. 1894–1898.
- S. Jain, V. Krishnamurthy, M. Rangaswamy, B. Kang, and S. Gogineni, “Radar clutter covariance estimation: A nonlinear spectral shrinkage approach,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 7640–7653, 2023.
Sponsor
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.