Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Self-Consistency Training for Density-Functional-Theory Hamiltonian Prediction (2403.09560v2)

Published 14 Mar 2024 in cs.LG, physics.chem-ph, and q-bio.BM

Abstract: Predicting the mean-field Hamiltonian matrix in density functional theory is a fundamental formulation to leverage machine learning for solving molecular science problems. Yet, its applicability is limited by insufficient labeled data for training. In this work, we highlight that Hamiltonian prediction possesses a self-consistency principle, based on which we propose self-consistency training, an exact training method that does not require labeled data. It distinguishes the task from predicting other molecular properties by the following benefits: (1) it enables the model to be trained on a large amount of unlabeled data, hence addresses the data scarcity challenge and enhances generalization; (2) it is more efficient than running DFT to generate labels for supervised training, since it amortizes DFT calculation over a set of queries. We empirically demonstrate the better generalization in data-scarce and out-of-distribution scenarios, and the better efficiency over DFT labeling. These benefits push forward the applicability of Hamiltonian prediction to an ever-larger scale.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (62)
  1. Becke, A. D. Density-functional thermochemistry. I. the effect of the exchange-only gradient correction. The Journal of chemical physics, 96(3):2155–2160, 1992.
  2. Becke, A. D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 98, 1993. ISSN 00219606. doi: 10.1063/1.464913.
  3. On the convergence of SCF algorithms for the Hartree-Fock equations. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 34(4):749–774, 2000.
  4. Open catalyst 2020 (OC20) dataset and community challenges. Acs Catalysis, 11(10):6059–6072, 2021.
  5. DeePKS: A comprehensive data-driven approach toward chemically accurate density functional theory. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 17(1):170–181, 2021.
  6. sGDML: Constructing accurate and data efficient molecular force fields using machine learning. Computer Physics Communications, 240:38–45, 2019.
  7. Accurate global machine learning force fields for molecules with hundreds of atoms. Science Advances, 9(2):eadf0873, 2023.
  8. Variational principle to regularize machine-learned density functionals: the non-interacting kinetic-energy functional. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.17587, 2023.
  9. Machine learning accurate exchange and correlation functionals of the electronic density. Nature communications, 11(1):3509, 2020.
  10. Self-consistent molecular-orbital methods. ix. an extended gaussian-type basis for molecular-orbital studies of organic molecules. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 54(2):724–728, 1971.
  11. Dunlap, B. I. Robust and variational fitting. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2:2113–2116, 2000. doi: 10.1039/B000027M. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B000027M.
  12. Dunning Jr, T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. i. the atoms boron through neon and hydrogen. The Journal of chemical physics, 90(2):1007–1023, 1989.
  13. Fast graph representation learning with PyTorch Geometric. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.02428, 2019.
  14. A deep neural network for molecular wave functions in quasi-atomic minimal basis representation. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 153(4), 2020.
  15. Directional message passing for molecular graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.03123, 2020.
  16. General framework for E(3)-equivariant neural network representation of density functional theory Hamiltonian. Nature Communications, 14(1):2848, 2023.
  17. Neural network representation of electronic structure from ab initio molecular dynamics. Science Bulletin, 67(1):29–37, 2022.
  18. Machine-learned approximations to density functional theory hamiltonians. Scientific reports, 7(1):42669, 2017.
  19. Development of new auxiliary basis functions of the karlsruhe segmented contracted basis sets including diffuse basis functions (def2-svpd, def2-tzvppd, and def2-qvppd) for ri-mp2 and ri-cc calculations. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 17(2):1010–1017, 2015.
  20. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Physical review, 136(3B):B864, 1964.
  21. Order-N orbital-free density-functional calculations with machine learning of functional derivatives for semiconductors and metals. Physical Review Research, 3(3):033198, 2021.
  22. Matrix backpropagation for deep networks with structured layers. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp.  2965–2973, 2015.
  23. Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Materials, 1(1):011002, 07 2013. ISSN 2166-532X. doi: 10.1063/1.4812323. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323.
  24. Jensen, F. Polarization consistent basis sets: Principles. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 115(20):9113–9125, 2001.
  25. Virtual screening, molecular docking studies and dft calculations of fda approved compounds similar to the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (nnrti) efavirenz. Heliyon, 6(8), 2020.
  26. Pushing the frontiers of density functionals by solving the fractional electron problem. Science, 374(6573):1385–1389, 2021.
  27. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Physical review, 140(4A):A1133, 1965.
  28. A black-box self-consistent field convergence algorithm: One step closer. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 116(19):8255–8261, 04 2002. ISSN 0021-9606. doi: 10.1063/1.1470195. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1470195.
  29. Levy, M. Universal variational functionals of electron densities, first-order density matrices, and natural spin-orbitals and solution of the v-representability problem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 76(12):6062–6065, 1979.
  30. Deep-learning density functional theory Hamiltonian for efficient ab initio electronic-structure calculation. Nature Computational Science, 2(6):367–377, 2022.
  31. Equiformer: Equivariant graph attention transformer for 3d atomistic graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.11990, 2022.
  32. Lieb, E. H. Density functionals for Coulomb systems. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 24(3):243–277, 1983.
  33. Equivariant representations for molecular Hamiltonians and N-center atomic-scale properties. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 156(1), 2022.
  34. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  35. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical review letters, 77(18):3865, 1996.
  36. Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces. Physical review letters, 100(13):136406, 2008.
  37. Pulay, P. Improved SCF convergence acceleration. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 3(4):556–560, 1982. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540030413. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jcc.540030413.
  38. Quantum chemistry structures and properties of 134 kilo molecules. Scientific data, 1(1):1–7, 2014.
  39. KineticNet: Deep learning a transferable kinetic energy functional for orbital-free density functional theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13316, 2023.
  40. Schnet–a deep learning architecture for molecules and materials. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 148(24), 2018.
  41. Unifying machine learning and quantum chemistry with a deep neural network for molecular wavefunctions. Nature communications, 10(1):5024, 2019.
  42. Seminario, J. M. Recent developments and applications of modern density functional theory. 1996.
  43. Orbital Mixer: Using atomic orbital features for basis-dependent prediction of molecular wavefunctions. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 18(10):6021–6030, 2022.
  44. Slater, J. C. A simplification of the Hartree-Fock method. Physical review, 81(3):385, 1951.
  45. Finding density functionals with machine learning. Physical review letters, 108(25):253002, 2012.
  46. Why approximate matrix square root outperforms accurate SVD in global covariance pooling? In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp.  1115–1123, 2021.
  47. Ab initio calculation of vibrational absorption and circular dichroism spectra using density functional force fields. The Journal of physical chemistry, 98(45):11623–11627, 1994.
  48. PySCF: the python-based simulations of chemistry framework. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 8(1):e1340, 2018.
  49. DFT exchange: sharing perspectives on the workhorse of quantum chemistry and materials science. Physical chemistry chemical physics, 24(47):28700–28781, 2022.
  50. Equivariant transformers for neural network based molecular potentials. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  51. SE(3)-equivariant prediction of molecular wavefunctions and electronic densities. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:14434–14447, 2021.
  52. Backpropagation-friendly eigendecomposition. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
  53. Robust differentiable svd. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 44(9):5472–5487, 2021a.
  54. Orbital-free kinetic-energy density functionals with a density-dependent kernel. Physical Review B, 60(24):16350, 1999.
  55. Machine learning method for tight-binding hamiltonian parameterization from ab-initio band structure. npj Computational Materials, 7(1):11, 2021b.
  56. Orbital-free density functional theory for materials research. Journal of Materials Research, 33(7):777–795, 2018.
  57. Harmonizing covariance and expressiveness for deep Hamiltonian regression in crystalline material research: a hybrid cascaded regression framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00744, 2024.
  58. QH9: A quantum hamiltonian prediction benchmark for QM9 molecules. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09549, 2023a.
  59. Efficient and equivariant graph networks for predicting quantum Hamiltonian. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.04922, 2023b.
  60. M-OFDFT: Overcoming the barrier of orbital-free density functional theory for molecular systems using deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16578, 2023.
  61. Equivariant analytical mapping of first principles Hamiltonians to accurate and transferable materials models. Npj Computational Materials, 8(1):158, 2022.
  62. Transferable equivariant graph neural networks for the hamiltonians of molecules and solids. npj Computational Materials, 9(1):182, 2023.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper:

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com