Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Adaptation of the Multi-Concept Multivariate Elo Rating System to Medical Students Training Data (2403.07908v1)

Published 26 Feb 2024 in cs.CY

Abstract: Accurate estimation of question difficulty and prediction of student performance play key roles in optimizing educational instruction and enhancing learning outcomes within digital learning platforms. The Elo rating system is widely recognized for its proficiency in predicting student performance by estimating both question difficulty and student ability while providing computational efficiency and real-time adaptivity. This paper presents an adaptation of a multi concept variant of the Elo rating system to the data collected by a medical training platform, a platform characterized by a vast knowledge corpus, substantial inter-concept overlap, a huge question bank with significant sparsity in user question interactions, and a highly diverse user population, presenting unique challenges. Our study is driven by two primary objectives: firstly, to comprehensively evaluate the Elo rating systems capabilities on this real-life data, and secondly, to tackle the issue of imprecise early stage estimations when implementing the Elo rating system for online assessments. Our findings suggest that the Elo rating system exhibits comparable accuracy to the well-established logistic regression model in predicting final exam outcomes for users within our digital platform. Furthermore, results underscore that initializing Elo rating estimates with historical data remarkably reduces errors and enhances prediction accuracy, especially during the initial phases of student interactions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. Knowledge tracing: A survey. Comput. Surveys 55, 11 (2023), 1–37.
  2. Modelling Learners in Adaptive Educational Systems: A Multivariate Glicko-Based Approach. In LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. 497–503.
  3. A multivariate ELO-based learner model for adaptive educational systems. In EDM 2019-Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. International Educational Data Mining Society, 228–233.
  4. Using Personalized Learning as an Instructional Approach to Motivate Learners in Online Higher Education: Learner Self-Determination and Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 52, 3 (2020), 322–352.
  5. Shadi Aljawarneh and Juan A. Lara. 2021. Data Science for Analyzing and Improving Educational Processes. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 33 (2021), 545–550.
  6. Margit Antal. 2013. On the Use of Elo Rating for Adaptive Assessment. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Informatica 58, 1 (2013), 29–41.
  7. Yigal Attali. 2014. A Ranking Method for Evaluating Constructed Responses. Educational and Psychological Measurement 74, 5 (2014), 795–808.
  8. Christopher Brooks and Craig Thompson. 2017. Predictive Modelling in Teaching and Learning. Handbook of Learning Analytics (2017), 61–68.
  9. Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention. Psychological Science 19, 11 (2008), 1095–1102.
  10. Wai-Lun Chan and Dit-Yan Yeung. 2021. Clickstream knowledge tracing: Modeling how students answer interactive online questions. In LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. 99–109.
  11. DAS3H: Modeling Student Learning and Forgetting for Optimally Scheduling Distributed Practice of Skills. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2019). 29–38.
  12. Albert T. Corbett and John R. Anderson. 1994. Knowledge Tracing: Modeling the Acquisition of Procedural Knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4 (1994), 253–278.
  13. Hermann Ebbinghaus. 2013. Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. Annals of Neurosciences 20, 4 (2013), 155.
  14. Arpad E. Elo and Sam Sloan. 1978. The Rating of Chessplayers: Past and Present.
  15. Context-aware attentive knowledge tracing. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 2330–2339.
  16. Tracking student progress in a game-like learning environment with a monte carlo bayesian knowledge tracing model. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge. 166–170.
  17. Computer Adaptive Practice of Maths Ability Using a New Item Response Model for On-the-Fly Ability and Difficulty Estimation. Computers & Education 57, 2 (2011), 1813–1824.
  18. Jung Lee and Ok-Choon Park. 2008. Adaptive Instructional Systems. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Routledge, 469–484.
  19. Learning Analytics: Current Trends and Innovative Practices. Journal of Computers in Education 7 (2020), 1–6.
  20. Improving Students’ Long-Term Knowledge Retention Through Personalized Review. Psychological Science 25, 3 (2014), 639–647.
  21. Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 106, 4 (2014), 901.
  22. Jan Papoušek and Radek Pelánek. 2015. Impact of Adaptive Educational System Behaviour on Student Motivation. In Artificial Intelligence in Education: 17th International Conference, AIED 2015, Madrid, Spain, June 22-26, 2015. Proceedings (Madrid, Spain), Vol. 17. Springer International Publishing.
  23. Jan Papoušek and Radek Pelánek. 2017. Should We Give Learners Control Over Item Difficulty?. In Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. 299–303.
  24. Adaptive Practice of Facts in Domains with Varied Prior Knowledge. In Educational Data Mining 2014.
  25. Radek Pelánek. 2014. Application of Time Decay Functions and the Elo System in Student Modeling. In Educational Data Mining 2014.
  26. Radek Pelánek. 2016. Applications of the Elo Rating System in Adaptive Educational Systems. Computers & Education 98 (2016), 169–179.
  27. Deep Knowledge Tracing. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). 505–513.
  28. Georg Rasch. 1960. Studies in Mathematical Psychology: I. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests.
  29. Variational deep knowledge tracing for language learning. In LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. 323–332.
  30. Saint+: Integrating temporal features for ednet correctness prediction. In LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. 490–496.
  31. Enhancing Human Learning via Spaced Repetition Optimization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 10 (2019), 3988–3993.
  32. Wim J. van der Linden and Ronald K. Hambleton (Eds.). 2013. Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Springer Science & Business Media.
  33. Kurt VanLehn. 2011. The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems. Educational Psychologist 46, 4 (2011), 197–221.
  34. Jill-Jênn Vie and Hisashi Kashima. 2019. Knowledge Tracing Machines: Factorization Machines for Knowledge Tracing. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 750–757.
  35. Item Difficulty Estimation: An Auspicious Collaboration Between Data and Judgment. Computers & Education 58, 4 (2012), 1183–1193.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.