Three statistical descriptions of classical systems and their extensions to hybrid quantum-classical systems (2403.07738v2)
Abstract: We present three statistical descriptions for systems of classical particles and consider their extension to hybrid quantum-classical systems. The classical descriptions are ensembles on configuration space, ensembles on phase space, and a Hilbert space approach using van Hove operators which provides an alternative to the Koopman-von Neumann formulation. In all cases, there is a natural way to define classical observables and a corresponding Lie algebra that is isomorphic to the usual Poisson algebra in phase space. We show that in the case of classical particles, the three descriptions are equivalent and indicate how they are related. We then modify and extend these descriptions to introduce hybrid models where a classical particle interacts with a quantum particle. The approach of ensembles on phase space and the Hilbert space approach, which are novel, lead to equivalent hybrid models, while they are not equivalent to the hybrid model of the approach of ensembles on configuration space. Thus, we end up identifying two inequivalent types of hybrid systems, making different predictions, especially when it comes to entanglement. These results are of interest regarding no-go'' theorems about quantum systems interacting via a classical mediator which address the issue of whether gravity must be quantized. Such theorems typically require assumptions that make them model dependent. The hybrid systems that we discuss provide concrete examples of inequivalent models that can be used to compute simple examples to test the assumptions of theno-go'' theorems and their applicability.
- D. R. Terno, Classical-quantum hybrid models (2023), preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05014.
- E. C. G. Sudarshan, Interaction between classical and quantum systems and the measurement of quantum observables, Pramana 6, 117 (1976).
- T. N. Sherry and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Interaction between classical and quantum systems: A new approach to quantum measurement.I, Phys. Rev. D 18, 4580 (1978).
- T. N. Sherry and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Interaction between classical and quantum systems: A new approach to quantum measurement. II. Theoretical considerations, Phys. Rev. D 20, 857 (1979).
- S. R. Gautam, T. N. Sherry, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Interaction between classical and quantum systems: A new approach to quantum measurement. III. Illustration, Phys. Rev. D 20, 3081 (1979).
- M. Reginatto and S. Ulbricht, Measurement of a quantum system with a classical apparatus using ensembles on configuration space, Journal of Physics A 55, 404003 (2022).
- S. Katagiri, Measurement theory in classical mechanics, Prog. theor. exp. phys. 2020, 063A02 (2020).
- W. Boucher and J. Traschen, Semiclassical physics and quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 37, 3522 (1988).
- M. J. W. Hall and M. Reginatto, On two recent proposals for witnessing nonclassical gravity, Journal of Physics A 51, 085303 (2018).
- J. Oppenheim and Z. Weller-Davies, The constraints of post-quantum classical gravity, Journal of High Energy Physics 2022 (2022).
- V. S. Melezhik, Quantum-quasiclassical analysis of center-of-mass nonseparability in hydrogen atom stimulated by strong laser fields *, Journal of Physics A 56, 154003 (2023).
- J. Gardner, S. Habershon, and R. J. Maurer, Assessing Mixed Quantum-Classical Molecular Dynamics Methods for Nonadiabatic Dynamics of Molecules on Metal Surfaces, J. Phys. Chem. C 127, 15257–15270 (2023).
- E. Villaseco Arribas and N. T. Maitra, Energy-conserving coupled trajectory mixed quantum–classical dynamics, The Journal of Chemical Physics 158 (2023).
- We have chosen to restrict to a short list of recent references because the number of works that use quantum-classical models to approximate purely quantum systems is too vast for us to try to be comprehensive.
- F. Zhan, Y. Lin, and B. Wu, Equivalence of two approaches for quantum-classical hybrid systems, The Journal of Chemical Physics 128 (2008).
- A. D. Bermúdez Manjarres, Phase space ensembles for classical and quantum-classical systems (2023), preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01880, arXiv:2305.01880 [quant-ph] .
- L. V. Hove, On Certain Unitary Representations of an Infinite Group of Transformations (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001).
- We point out that the extension of ensembles on configuration space to ensembles on phase space introduces some redundancy in the description of the classical system because the momentum 𝐩𝐩\mathbf{p}bold_p can also be expressed in terms of the action. As shown below, we can address this issue with an appropriate choice of σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ.
- L. D. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Mechanics (Pergammon Press, Oxford, 1976).
- J. F. Schuh, Mathematical Tools for Modern Physics (Philips Technical Library, Eindehoven, 1968).
- R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methods of mathematical physics, Vol. 2 (Wiley, New York, 1989).
- We will look more closely at the van Hove representation when we discuss the Hilbert space formulation of classical particles in section II.3.
- B. O. Koopman, Hamiltonian Systems and Transformation in Hilbert Space, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 17, 315 (1931).
- J. v. Neumann, Zur algebra der funktionaloperationen und theorie der normalen operatoren, Mathematische Annalen 102, 370 (1930).
- D. I. Bondar, F. Gay-Balmaz, and C. Tronci, Koopman wavefunctions and classical-quantum correlation dynamics, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 475, 20180879 (2019).
- F. Gay-Balmaz and C. Tronci, Madelung transform and probability densities in hybrid quantum–classical dynamics, Nonlinearity 33, 5383 (2020).
- F. Gay-Balmaz and C. Tronci, Koopman wavefunctions and classical states in hybrid quantum–classical dynamics, Journal of Geometric Mechanics 14, 559 (2022).
- U. Klein, From Koopman–von Neumann theory to quantum theory, Quantum Studies 5, 219–227 (2017).
- With some pathological exceptions where the square root of ϱitalic-ϱ\varrhoitalic_ϱ is not defined, like Klimontovich distributions ϱ=δ(𝐪−𝐪(t))δ(𝐩−𝐩(t))italic-ϱ𝛿𝐪𝐪𝑡𝛿𝐩𝐩𝑡\varrho=\delta(\mathbf{q}-\mathbf{q}(t))\delta(\mathbf{p}-\mathbf{p}(t))italic_ϱ = italic_δ ( bold_q - bold_q ( italic_t ) ) italic_δ ( bold_p - bold_p ( italic_t ) ) where 𝐪(t)𝐪𝑡\mathbf{q}(t)bold_q ( italic_t ) and 𝐩(t)𝐩𝑡\mathbf{p}(t)bold_p ( italic_t ) obey Hamiltonian equations of motion.
- L. D. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics (Non-relativistic Theory) (Pergammon Press, Oxford, 1977).
- R. J. Finkelstein, Nonrelativistic mechanics (W.A. Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1973).
- A. D. Bermúdez Manjarres, Projective representation of the galilei group for classical and quantum–classical systems*, Journal of Physics A 54, 444001 (2021).
- G. Lugarini and M. Pauri, Representation theory for classical mechanics, Annals of Physics 38, 299 (1966).
- We introduced the slash notation to indicate a conditional probability: P(q|α)𝑃conditional𝑞𝛼P(q|\alpha)italic_P ( italic_q | italic_α ) is the probability for q𝑞qitalic_q given a particular value of α𝛼\alphaitalic_α.
Sponsor
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.