Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

UPS: Efficiently Building Foundation Models for PDE Solving via Cross-Modal Adaptation

Published 11 Mar 2024 in cs.LG | (2403.07187v4)

Abstract: We present Unified PDE Solvers (UPS), a data- and compute-efficient approach to developing unified neural operators for diverse families of spatiotemporal PDEs from various domains, dimensions, and resolutions. UPS embeds different PDEs into a shared representation space and processes them using a FNO-transformer architecture. Rather than training the network from scratch, which is data-demanding and computationally expensive, we warm-start the transformer from pretrained LLMs and perform explicit alignment to reduce the modality gap while improving data and compute efficiency. The cross-modal UPS achieves state-of-the-art results on a wide range of 1D and 2D PDE families from PDEBench, outperforming existing unified models using 4 times less data and 26 times less compute. Meanwhile, it is capable of few-shot transfer to unseen PDE families and coefficients.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (43)
  1. Learning data-driven discretizations for partial differential equations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(31):15344–15349, 2019.
  2. Boyd, J. P. Chebyshev and Fourier spectral methods. Courier Corporation, 2001.
  3. Chemcrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05376, 2023.
  4. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020.
  5. Neural galerkin schemes with active learning for high-dimensional evolution equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 496:112588, 2024.
  6. Cao, S. Choose a transformer: Fourier or galerkin. Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:24924–24940, 2021.
  7. Universal approximation to nonlinear operators by neural networks with arbitrary activation functions and its application to dynamical systems. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 6(4):911–917, 1995.
  8. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models, 2022.
  9. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  10. Gnot: A general neural operator transformer for operator learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  12556–12569. PMLR, 2023.
  11. Axial attention in multidimensional transformers. International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  12. Learning neural pde solvers with convergence guarantees. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.01200, 2019.
  13. Gene set summarization using large language models. ArXiv, 2023.
  14. Solving parametric pde problems with artificial neural networks. European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 32(3):421–435, 2021.
  15. Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(21):e2101784118, 2021.
  16. Kopriva, D. A. Implementing spectral methods for partial differential equations: Algorithms for scientists and engineers. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
  17. LeVeque, R. J. Finite difference methods for ordinary and partial differential equations: steady-state and time-dependent problems. SIAM, 2007.
  18. Solving quantitative reasoning problems with language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:3843–3857, 2022.
  19. Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08895, 2020a.
  20. Neural operator: Graph kernel network for partial differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.03485, 2020b.
  21. Transformer for partial differential equations’ operator learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.13671, 2022.
  22. Pde-refiner: Achieving accurate long rollouts with neural pde solvers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05732, 2023.
  23. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692, 2019.
  24. Unified-io 2: Scaling autoregressive multimodal models with vision, language, audio, and action. ArXiv, abs/2312.17172, 2023. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:266573555.
  25. Frozen pretrained transformers as universal computation engines. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36(7):7628–7636, Jun. 2022.
  26. Deeponet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operators. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03193, 2019.
  27. Deep equilibrium based neural operators for steady-state pdes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00234, 2023.
  28. Multiple physics pretraining for physical surrogate models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02994, 2023.
  29. The finite volume method. Springer, 2016.
  30. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pp.  8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  31. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(1):5485–5551, 2020.
  32. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational physics, 378:686–707, 2019.
  33. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. ArXiv, abs/1505.04597, 2015. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:3719281.
  34. Introduction to the conll-2003 shared task: Language-independent named entity recognition. In Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, 2003. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:2470716.
  35. Cross-modal fine-tuning: Align then refine. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.05738, 2023.
  36. Tag-llm: Repurposing general-purpose llms for specialized domains, 2024.
  37. A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations. ArXiv e-prints, 2017.
  38. Towards foundation models for scientific machine learning: Characterizing scaling and transfer behavior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00258, 2023.
  39. Pdebench: An extensive benchmark for scientific machine learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:1596–1611, 2022.
  40. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. ArXiv, abs/2302.13971, 2023. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:257219404.
  41. NAS-bench-360: Benchmarking neural architecture search on diverse tasks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2022.
  42. Reprogramming pretrained language models for protein sequence representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.02120, 2023.
  43. Yu, B. et al. The deep ritz method: a deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problems. Communications in Mathematics and Statistics, 6(1):1–12, 2018.
Citations (4)

Summary

  • The paper introduces UPS, a novel unified PDE solver that leverages cross-modal LLM adaptation to significantly reduce data and compute requirements.
  • The methodology standardizes diverse PDE representations and employs a two-stage training process integrating pretrained LLMs with domain-specific neural operator layers.
  • Empirical results demonstrate UPS achieves state-of-the-art performance on PDEBench with remarkable few-shot learning capability across various 1D and 2D tasks.

Unified Neural Operators for Diverse Spatiotemporal PDEs via LLM Adaptation

Introduction to Unified PDE Solvers

The quest for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) is central to numerous scientific and engineering disciplines. Traditionally approached through analytical techniques or numerical methods, the rise of data-driven solutions, notably Deep Learning (DL), has opened up new avenues for addressing these complex problems. While DL-based methods like neural operators have shown promise in approximating solution maps to PDE families, they typically require training a unique model for each PDE family, involving substantial data and computational resources. Recent efforts towards developing foundation models seek to train a unified model capable of transferring across PDE families, albeit with significant data and computational demands.

This work introduces Unified PDE Solver (\ourmodel), a novel approach leveraging the prowess of LLMs and generative AI for solving a wide spectrum of spatiotemporal PDEs. By unifying PDEs into a consistent representation and ingeniously incorporating LLMs into the operator learning, \ourmodel demonstrates effective and data-efficient learning across various PDE families.

\ourmodel Methodology

\ourmodel tackles the challenge of processing diverse PDE data by proposing a standardized data representation and an innovative LLM-based network architecture. The unified data representation bridges PDEs of different dimensions, ensuring a homogenized input format. The ensuing unified network architecture synergistically combines pretrained LLMs with domain-specific FNO layers, effectively processing the unified PDE data.

A significant contribution of this work is the two-stage cross-modal adaptation process. Initial training aims at aligning the LLMs’ understanding of PDEs, while subsequent fine-tuning harnesses multitask learning across various PDE tasks. This methodology not only facilitates leveraging the vast knowledge base of LLMs but also enhances performance with considerably fewer training samples.

Empirical Validation and Implications

\ourmodel's efficacy is rigorously benchmarked on the PDEBench framework, encompassing a wide range of 1D and 2D PDE tasks. The model exhibits superior performance, achieving state-of-the-art results on multiple benchmarks and demonstrating remarkable few-shot learning capabilities on unseen PDE families and conditions. These results underscore the potential of \ourmodel to serve as a generalized solver for complex physical systems.

Discussion and Outlook

This work represents a pivotal step towards realizing generalized foundation models for solving PDEs efficiently. By effectively adapting pretrained LLMs to the domain of PDEs, we not only achieve impressive empirical results but also dramatically reduce the data and compute requirements typically associated with training unified neural PDE solvers from scratch.

The successful adaptation of LLMs to PDE solving, as demonstrated in this study, opens up promising avenues for future research. Extending this approach to higher-dimensional PDEs and other types of physical systems, as well as further exploring the potential of LLMs in solving inverse problems, represents exciting directions for advancing the field.

\ourmodel strikes a balance between leveraging existing AI advancements and tailoring solutions to the computational physics domain. As the field of AI continues to evolve, particularly in the field of LLMs, \ourmodel presents a scalable and efficient framework for benefiting from these advancements, pushing the boundaries of what is achievable in computational physics and beyond.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 5 tweets with 108 likes about this paper.