Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 153 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 79 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 428 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Evidence of a Past Merger of the Galactic Center Black Hole (2403.06416v4)

Published 11 Mar 2024 in astro-ph.GA, astro-ph.CO, and astro-ph.HE

Abstract: The origin of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) residing in the centers of most galaxies remains a mystery. The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) provided direct imaging of the SMBH Sgr A* at the Milky Way's center, indicating it likely spins rapidly with its spin axis significantly misaligned relative to the Galactic plane's angular momentum. Through investigating various SMBH growth models, here we show that the inferred spin properties of Sgr A* provide evidence of a past SMBH merger. Inspired by the merger between the Milky Way and Gaia-Enceladus, which has a 4:1 mass ratio as inferred from Gaia data, we have discovered that a 4:1 major merger of SMBH with a binary angular momentum inclination angle of 145-180 degrees with respect to the line of sight (LOS), can successfully replicate the measured spin properties of Sgr A*. This merger event in our galaxy provides potential observational support for the theory of hierarchical BH mergers in the formation and growth of SMBHs. The inferred merger rate, consistent with theoretical predictions, suggests a promising detection rate of SMBH mergers for space-borne gravitational wave detectors expected to operate in 2030s.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (104)
  1. Richstone, D. et al. Supermassive black holes and the evolution of galaxies. Nature 385, A14 (1998). astro-ph/9810378.
  2. Fan, X. et al. A Survey of z>>>5.8 Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. I. Discovery of Three New Quasars and the Spatial Density of Luminous Quasars at z~6. AJ 122, 2833–2849 (2001). astro-ph/0108063.
  3. Lawrence, A. et al. The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS). MNRAS 379, 1599–1617 (2007). astro-ph/0604426.
  4. Soltan, A. Masses of quasars. MNRAS 200, 115–122 (1982).
  5. Observational constraints on growth of massive black holes. MNRAS 335, 965–976 (2002). astro-ph/0203082.
  6. The Assembly and Merging History of Supermassive Black Holes in Hierarchical Models of Galaxy Formation. ApJ 582, 559–573 (2003). astro-ph/0207276.
  7. Springel, V. et al. Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars. Nature 435, 629–636 (2005). astro-ph/0504097.
  8. Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way. ApJ 930, L12 (2022).
  9. Helmi, A. et al. The merger that led to the formation of the Milky Way’s inner stellar halo and thick disk. Nature 563, 85–88 (2018). 1806.06038.
  10. Amaro-Seoane, P. et al. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1702.00786 (2017). 1702.00786.
  11. Taiji Program: Gravitational-Wave Sources. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1807.09495 (2018). 1807.09495.
  12. Luo, J. et al. TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector. Classical and Quantum Gravity 33, 035010 (2016). 1512.02076.
  13. Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Testing Astrophysical Models of the Galactic Center Black Hole. ApJ 930, L16 (2022).
  14. An Upper Limit on the Spin of SgrA* Based on Stellar Orbits in Its Vicinity. ApJ 901, L32 (2020). 2008.11734.
  15. Black Hole Spin and Galactic Morphology. ApJ 667, 704–713 (2007). 0706.3900.
  16. Growing supermassive black holes by chaotic accretion. MNRAS 373, L90–L92 (2006). astro-ph/0609598.
  17. Black hole evolution - III. Statistical properties of mass growth and spin evolution using large-scale hydrodynamical cosmological simulations. MNRAS 440, 1590–1606 (2014). 1304.4583.
  18. Beckmann, R. S. et al. Supermassive black holes in merger-free galaxies have higher spins which are preferentially aligned with their host galaxy. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2211.13614 (2022). 2211.13614.
  19. Supermassive black hole spin evolution in cosmological simulations with OpenGadget3. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2312.07657 (2023). 2312.07657.
  20. Peirani, S. et al. Cosmic evolution of black hole-spin and galaxy orientations: clues from the NewHorizon and Galactica simulations. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2401.03712 (2024). 2401.03712.
  21. The Merger History of Supermassive Black Holes in Galaxies. ApJ 558, 535–542 (2001). astro-ph/0101196.
  22. The Assembly of Supermassive Black Holes at High Redshifts. ApJ 696, 1798–1822 (2009). 0807.4702.
  23. Intermediate-Mass Black Holes. ARA&A 58, 257–312 (2020). 1911.09678.
  24. Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes. MNRAS 179, 433–456 (1977).
  25. Hyperaccreting Black Hole as Gamma-Ray Burst Central Engine. II. Temporal Evolution of the Central Engine Parameters during the Prompt and Afterglow Phases. ApJ 849, 47 (2017). 1708.05043.
  26. Magorrian, J. et al. The Demography of Massive Dark Objects in Galaxy Centers. AJ 115, 2285–2305 (1998). astro-ph/9708072.
  27. Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies. ARA&A 51, 511–653 (2013). 1304.7762.
  28. Lang, M. et al. Can a satellite galaxy merger explain the active past of the Galactic Centre? MNRAS 430, 2574–2584 (2013). 1107.2923.
  29. The Orientation of Jets Relative to Dust Disks in Radio Galaxies. ApJ 575, 150–155 (2002). astro-ph/0204247.
  30. Resolving cosmic structure formation with the Millennium-II Simulation. MNRAS 398, 1150–1164 (2009). 0903.3041.
  31. Formation of Galactic Nuclei. ApJ 563, 34–62 (2001). astro-ph/0103350.
  32. Scattering experiments meet N-body - I. A practical recipe for the evolution of massive black hole binaries in stellar environments. MNRAS 454, L66–L70 (2015). 1505.02062.
  33. Interactions between multiple supermassive black holes in galactic nuclei: a solution to the final parsec problem. MNRAS 473, 3410–3433 (2018). 1709.06501.
  34. The Gravitational Wave Signal from Massive Black Hole Binaries and Its Contribution to the LISA Data Stream. ApJ 623, 23–30 (2005). astro-ph/0409255.
  35. Volonteri, M. et al. Black hole mergers from dwarf to massive galaxies with the NewHorizon and Horizon-AGN simulations. MNRAS 498, 2219–2238 (2020). 2005.04902.
  36. Massive Black Hole Binaries from the TNG50-3 Simulation. I. Coalescence and LISA Detection Rates. ApJ 933, 104 (2022). 2201.11088.
  37. The Evolution of Galaxy Number Density at z <<< 8 and Its Implications. ApJ 830, 83 (2016). 1607.03909.
  38. The Proper Motion of Sagittarius A*. II. The Mass of Sagittarius A*. ApJ 616, 872–884 (2004). astro-ph/0408107.
  39. Ghez, A. M. et al. Measuring Distance and Properties of the Milky Way’s Central Supermassive Black Hole with Stellar Orbits. ApJ 689, 1044–1062 (2008). 0808.2870.
  40. The Proper Motion of Sagittarius A*. III. The Case for a Supermassive Black Hole. ApJ 892, 39 (2020). 2001.04386.
  41. Ejection of Supermassive Black Holes from Galaxy Cores. ApJ 678, 780–797 (2008). 0708.0771.
  42. Hirano, S. et al. One Hundred First Stars: Protostellar Evolution and the Final Masses. ApJ 781, 60 (2014). 1308.4456.
  43. The evolution and fate of Very Massive Objects. ApJ 280, 825–847 (1984).
  44. Massive Black Holes as Population III Remnants. ApJ 551, L27–L30 (2001). astro-ph/0101223.
  45. Massive black holes in globular clusters. Nature 256, 23–24 (1975).
  46. The fate of dense stellar systems. MNRAS 185, 847–860 (1978).
  47. The Dynamical Evolution of Dense Star Clusters in Galactic Nuclei. ApJ 356, 483 (1990).
  48. Lee, M. H. N-Body Evolution of Dense Clusters of Compact Stars. ApJ 418, 147 (1993).
  49. Ebisuzaki, T. et al. Missing Link Found? The “Runaway” Path to Supermassive Black Holes. ApJ 562, L19–L22 (2001). astro-ph/0106252.
  50. Production of intermediate-mass black holes in globular clusters. MNRAS 330, 232–240 (2002). astro-ph/0106188.
  51. The Runaway Growth of Intermediate-Mass Black Holes in Dense Star Clusters. ApJ 576, 899–907 (2002). astro-ph/0201055.
  52. The Formation of Intermediate-mass Black Holes in Galactic Nuclei. ApJ 929, L22 (2022). 2201.00022.
  53. Atallah, D. et al. Growing black holes through successive mergers in galactic nuclei - I. Methods and first results. MNRAS 523, 4227–4250 (2023). 2211.09670.
  54. Can Supermassive Black Holes Form in Metal-enriched High-Redshift Protogalaxies? ApJ 686, 801–814 (2008). 0804.3141.
  55. Formation of the First Nuclear Clusters and Massive Black Holes at High Redshift. ApJ 694, 302–313 (2009). 0810.1057.
  56. Collapse of Primordial Gas Clouds and the Formation of Quasar Black Holes. ApJ 432, 52 (1994). astro-ph/9401026.
  57. Formation of supermassive black holes by direct collapse in pre-galactic haloes. MNRAS 370, 289–298 (2006). astro-ph/0602363.
  58. Supermassive black hole formation during the assembly of pre-galactic discs. MNRAS 371, 1813–1823 (2006). astro-ph/0606159.
  59. Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance. A&A 24, 337–355 (1973).
  60. The evolution of viscous discs and the origin of the nebular variables. MNRAS 168, 603–637 (1974).
  61. A two-temperature accretion disk model for Cygnus X-1: structure and spectrum. ApJ 204, 187–199 (1976).
  62. Ichimaru, S. Bimodal behavior of accretion disks: theory and application to Cygnus X-1 transitions. ApJ 214, 840–855 (1977).
  63. Advection-dominated Accretion: A Self-similar Solution. ApJ 428, L13 (1994). astro-ph/9403052.
  64. Advection-dominated Accretion: Self-Similarity and Bipolar Outflows. ApJ 444, 231 (1995). astro-ph/9411058.
  65. On the fate of gas accreting at a low rate on to a black hole. MNRAS 303, L1–L5 (1999). astro-ph/9809083.
  66. McKinney, J. C. Total and Jet Blandford-Znajek Power in the Presence of an Accretion Disk. ApJ 630, L5–L8 (2005). astro-ph/0506367.
  67. The power of relativistic jets is larger than the luminosity of their accretion disks. Nature 515, 376–378 (2014). 1411.5368.
  68. Jets in magnetically arrested hot accretion flows: geometry, power, and black hole spin-down. MNRAS 511, 3795–3813 (2022). 2108.12380.
  69. Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows. ApJ 592, 1042–1059 (2003). astro-ph/0301402.
  70. Magnetically Arrested Disk: an Energetically Efficient Accretion Flow. PASJ 55, L69–L72 (2003). astro-ph/0305029.
  71. GRMHD simulations of magnetized advection-dominated accretion on a non-spinning black hole: role of outflows. MNRAS 426, 3241–3259 (2012). 1206.1213.
  72. Disk-Accretion onto a Black Hole. Time-Averaged Structure of Accretion Disk. ApJ 191, 499–506 (1974).
  73. The evolution of black hole mass and spin in active galactic nuclei. MNRAS 385, 1621–1627 (2008). 0801.1564.
  74. Chaotic gas accretion by black holes embedded in AGN discs as cause of low-spin signatures in gravitational wave events. MNRAS 522, 319–329 (2023). 2303.17097.
  75. Spin evolution and feedback of supermassive black holes in cosmological simulations. MNRAS 490, 4133–4153 (2019). 1902.04651.
  76. Varma, V. et al. Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole simulations with unequal masses. Physical Review Research 1, 033015 (2019). 1905.09300.
  77. Boschini, M. et al. Extending black-hole remnant surrogate models to extreme mass ratios. Phys. Rev. D 108, 084015 (2023). 2307.03435.
  78. Blackman, J. et al. Numerical relativity waveform surrogate model for generically precessing binary black hole mergers. Phys. Rev. D 96, 024058 (2017). 1705.07089.
  79. High-Accuracy Mass, Spin, and Recoil Predictions of Generic Black-Hole Merger Remnants. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 011101 (2019). 1809.09125.
  80. Guo, Q. et al. From dwarf spheroidals to cD galaxies: simulating the galaxy population in a ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM cosmology. MNRAS 413, 101–131 (2011). 1006.0106.
  81. Tidal disruption events from massive black hole binaries: predictions for ongoing and future surveys. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1811.01960 (2018). 1811.01960.
  82. Massive black hole binaries in active galactic nuclei. Nature 287, 307–309 (1980).
  83. Disk-satellite interactions. ApJ 241, 425–441 (1980).
  84. Efficient Merger of Binary Supermassive Black Holes in Nonaxisymmetric Galaxies. ApJ 642, L21–L24 (2006). astro-ph/0601698.
  85. The Final-parsec Problem in the Collisionless Limit. ApJ 810, 49 (2015). 1505.05480.
  86. Quinlan, G. D. The dynamical evolution of massive black hole binaries I. Hardening in a fixed stellar background. New A 1, 35–56 (1996). astro-ph/9601092.
  87. Interaction of Massive Black Hole Binaries with Their Stellar Environment. I. Ejection of Hypervelocity Stars. ApJ 651, 392–400 (2006). astro-ph/0604299.
  88. Gravitational Radiation from Point Masses in a Keplerian Orbit. Physical Review 131, 435–440 (1963).
  89. Peters, P. C. Gravitational Radiation and the Motion of Two Point Masses. Physical Review 136, 1224–1232 (1964).
  90. Dehnen, W. A Family of Potential-Density Pairs for Spherical Galaxies and Bulges. MNRAS 265, 250 (1993).
  91. From star clusters to dwarf galaxies: the properties of dynamically hot stellar systems. MNRAS 386, 864–886 (2008). 0802.0703.
  92. Bekenstein, J. D. Gravitational-Radiation Recoil and Runaway Black Holes. ApJ 183, 657–664 (1973).
  93. Effects of gravitational-wave recoil on the dynamics and growth of supermassive black holes. MNRAS 390, 1311–1325 (2008). 0805.1420.
  94. Brownian Motion of Black Holes in Dense Nuclei. AJ 133, 553–563 (2007). astro-ph/0408029.
  95. The Need for a Second Black Hole at the Galactic Center. ApJ 593, L77–L80 (2003). astro-ph/0306074.
  96. The nature of the Galactic Center source IRS 13 revealed by high spatial resolution in the infrared. A&A 423, 155–167 (2004). astro-ph/0404450.
  97. The Disruption of Stellar Clusters Containing Massive Black Holes near the Galactic Center. ApJ 628, 236–245 (2005). astro-ph/0412452.
  98. Perturbations of Intermediate-mass Black Holes on Stellar Orbits in the Galactic Center. ApJ 705, 361–371 (2009). 0905.4514.
  99. Is There an Intermediate Massive Black Hole in the Galactic Center: Imprints on the Stellar Tidal-disruption Rate. ApJ 762, 95 (2013). 1211.4609.
  100. The Hills Mechanism and the Galactic Center S-stars. ApJ 896, 137 (2020). 2002.10547.
  101. Naoz, S. et al. A Hidden Friend for the Galactic Center Black Hole, Sgr A*. ApJ 888, L8 (2020). 1912.04910.
  102. The Influence of the Secular Perturbation of an Intermediate-mass Companion. I. Eccentricity Excitation of Disk Stars at the Galactic Center. ApJ 905, 169 (2020). 2011.04653.
  103. Will, C. M. et al. Constraining a Companion of the Galactic Center Black Hole Sgr A*. ApJ 959, 58 (2023). 2307.16646.
  104. Gravity Collaboration et al. Where intermediate-mass black holes could hide in the Galactic Centre. A full parameter study with the S2 orbit. A&A 672, A63 (2023). 2303.04067.

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that EHT observations reveal Sgr A*’s rapid, misaligned spin indicative of a past major merger.
  • The paper employs simulations using the NRSur7dq4EmriRemnant model to replicate observed spin dynamics and support merger interpretations.
  • The paper links its findings to cosmological implications by predicting observable SMBH merger rates for future gravitational wave detectors like LISA.

Evidence of a Past Merger of the Galactic Center Black Hole

The paper under review provides a comprehensive analysis of the spin properties of the supermassive black hole (SMBH) Sgr A* located at the center of the Milky Way. The investigation leverages the observational data from the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT), which suggests that Sgr A* exhibits rapid rotation with its spin axis significantly misaligned relative to the angular momentum of the galaxy's plane. The authors propose a past merger event as a plausible explanation for these spin characteristics, challenging traditional SMBH growth models based solely on accretion.

Spin Constraints and Their Implications

The inference of a rapidly spinning Sgr A* with a misaligned spin axis presents challenges to established accretion-based SMBH growth models. Both coherent and chaotic accretion models face limitations, as coherent models are inconsistent with a significant spin misalignment, while chaotic models are unlikely to result in high spin magnitudes due to their episodic nature. Therefore, these models are insufficient to simultaneously explain the high spin and misalignment observed for Sgr A*.

Merger Models as a Solution

The authors explore the possibility of a past hierarchical merger to account for Sgr A*'s spin properties. They simulate the evolution of SMBH growth through accretion and merger models starting from different SMBH seeds, considering both coherent and chaotic accretion processes. Furthermore, they utilize the surrogate BH merger model NRSur7dq4EmriRemnant to predict post-merger spin characteristics.

A critical aspect of the model is the proposed 4:1 major merger likelihood between two galaxies, correlating with the Milky Way's merger history with Gaia-Enceladus about 10 billion years ago. The paper finds that a major merger with specific binary angular momentum inclination angles can reproduce the observed spin properties of Sgr A*. This merger interpretation is supported by the constraints from the EHT observations, which suggest specific pre-merger spin conditions.

Cosmological Implications and Future Prospects

The paper ties these findings into broader cosmological simulations, which predict a low galaxy merger rate. However, the merging history reflected by Sgr A* supports the theory that SMBH mergers significantly contribute to the Sgr A* properties observed. The estimated major merger rate density from simulations is consistent with theoretical predictions, suggesting observable rates of SMBH mergers for upcoming space-borne gravitational wave detectors, such as LISA, Taiji, and TianQin.

These detectors, expected to operate in the 2030s, present opportunities for further validation of this merger hypothesis through direct observations of SMBH binaries. Thus, the paper not only elucidates a historical perspective on Sgr A*'s growth but also anticipates a promising future for gravitational wave astronomy in confirming SMBH merger events.

Conclusion

This research presents a robust argument for the role of past mergers in shaping the spin dynamics of Sgr A*, offering a cohesive explanation that aligns with both empirical observations and theoretical models. The implications extend beyond local observations, placing this paper at the convergence of observational astrophysics and theoretical cosmology, with promising prospects for future gravitational wave detector missions.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 8 tweets and received 376 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: