Quantum error cancellation in photonic systems -- undoing photon losses (2403.05252v2)
Abstract: Real photonic devices are subject to photon losses that can decohere quantum information encoded in the system. In the absence of full fault tolerance, quantum error mitigation techniques have been introduced to help manage errors in noisy quantum devices. In this work, we introduce an error mitigation protocol inspired by probabilistic error cancellation (a popular error mitigation technique in discrete variable systems) for continuous variable systems. We show that our quantum error cancellation protocol can undo photon losses in expectation value estimation tasks. To do this, we analytically derive the (non-physical) inverse photon loss channel and decompose it into a sum over physically realisable channels with potentially negative coefficients. The bias of our ideal expectation value estimator can be made arbitrarily small at the cost of increasing the sampling overhead. The protocol requires a noiseless amplification followed by a series of photon-subtractions. While these operations can be implemented probabilistically, for certain classes of initial state one can avoid the burden of carrying out the amplification and photon-subtractions by leveraging Monte-Carlo methods to give an unbiased estimate of the ideal expectation value. We validate our proposed mitigation protocol by simulating the scheme on squeezed vacuum states, cat states and entangled coherent states.
- A. Montanaro, Quantum algorithms: an overview, npj Quantum Information 2, 1 (2016).
- P. W. Shor, Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer, SIAM review 41, 303 (1999).
- L. K. Grover, Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 325 (1997).
- S. Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science 273, 1073 (1996).
- M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information (Cambridge university press, 2010).
- D. Gottesman, An introduction to quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation, in Quantum information science and its contributions to mathematics, Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 68 (2010) pp. 13–58.
- D. A. Lidar and T. A. Brun, Quantum error correction (Cambridge university press, 2013).
- J. Preskill, Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
- K. Temme, S. Bravyi, and J. M. Gambetta, Error Mitigation for Short-Depth Quantum Circuits, Physical Review Letters 119, 180509 (2017).
- Y. Li and S. C. Benjamin, Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimization, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021050 (2017).
- B. Koczor, Exponential error suppression for near-term quantum devices, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031057 (2021).
- S. Endo, S. C. Benjamin, and Y. Li, Practical quantum error mitigation for near-future applications, Physical Review X 8, 031027 (2018).
- C. Piveteau, D. Sutter, and S. Woerner, Quasiprobability decompositions with reduced sampling overhead, npj Quantum Information 8, 12 (2022).
- S. Aaronson and A. Arkhipov, The computational complexity of linear optics, Theory of Computing 9, 143 (2013).
- K. Tsubouchi, T. Sagawa, and N. Yoshioka, Universal cost bound of quantum error mitigation based on quantum estimation theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 210601 (2023).
- The set of noisy operators {ℱj}subscriptℱ𝑗\{\mathcal{F}_{j}\}{ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } should form an noisy operator basis into which 𝒰idealsubscript𝒰ideal\mathcal{U}_{\textrm{ideal}}caligraphic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ideal end_POSTSUBSCRIPT can be decomposed.
- M. S. Kim and N. Imoto, Phase-sensitive reservoir modeled by beam splitters, Phys. Rev. A 52, 2401 (1995).
- R. J. Glauber, Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field, Physical Review 131, 2766 (1963).
- M. Oszmaniec and D. J. Brod, Classical simulation of photonic linear optics with lost particles, New Journal of Physics 20, 092002 (2018).
- D. J. Brod and M. Oszmaniec, Classical simulation of linear optics subject to nonuniform losses, Quantum 4, 267 (2020).
- T. C. Ralph and A. Lund, Nondeterministic noiseless linear amplification of quantum systems, in AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1110 (American Institute of Physics, 2009) pp. 155–160.
- M. Kim, Recent developments in photon-level operations on travelling light fields, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 41, 133001 (2008).
- M. S. Winnel, N. Hosseinidehaj, and T. C. Ralph, Generalized quantum scissors for noiseless linear amplification, Physical Review A 102, 063715 (2020).
- A. Zavatta, J. Fiurášek, and M. Bellini, A high-fidelity noiseless amplifier for quantum light states, Nature Photonics 5, 52 (2011).
- Z. Cai, A practical framework for quantum error mitigation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05389 (2021).
- C. M. Nunn, S. U. Shringarpure, and T. B. Pittman, Transforming photon statistics through zero-photon subtraction, Phys. Rev. A 107, 043711 (2023).
- A. Serafini, Quantum continuous variables: a primer of theoretical methods (CRC press, 2017).
- A. Royer, Wigner function as the expectation value of a parity operator, Phys. Rev. A 15, 449 (1977).
Sponsor
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.