Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Using Causal Trees to Estimate Personalized Task Difficulty in Post-Stroke Individuals

Published 6 Mar 2024 in cs.RO, cs.HC, and cs.LG | (2403.04109v1)

Abstract: Adaptive training programs are crucial for recovery post stroke. However, developing programs that automatically adapt depends on quantifying how difficult a task is for a specific individual at a particular stage of their recovery. In this work, we propose a method that automatically generates regions of different task difficulty levels based on an individual's performance. We show that this technique explains the variance in user performance for a reaching task better than previous approaches to estimating task difficulty.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (10)
  1. M. A. Guadagnoli and T. D. Lee, “Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning,” Journal of motor behavior, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 212–224, 2004.
  2. C. E. Han, S. Kim, S. Chen, Y.-H. Lai, J.-Y. Lee, R. Osu, C. J. Winstein, and N. Schweighofer, “Quantifying arm nonuse in individuals poststroke,” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 439–447, 2013.
  3. M. L. Woodbury, K. Anderson, C. Finetto, A. Fortune, B. Dellenbach, E. Grattan, and S. Hutchison, “Matching task difficulty to patient ability during task practice improves upper extremity motor skill after stroke: a proof-of-concept study,” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 1863–1871, 2016.
  4. J.-C. Metzger, O. Lambercy, A. Califfi, D. Dinacci, C. Petrillo, P. Rossi, F. M. Conti, and R. Gassert, “Assessment-driven selection and adaptation of exercise difficulty in robot-assisted therapy: a pilot study with a hand rehabilitation robot,” Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2014.
  5. H. J. Asl, T. Narikiyo, and M. Kawanishi, “An assist-as-needed control scheme for robot-assisted rehabilitation,” in 2017 American control conference (ACC).   IEEE, 2017, pp. 198–203.
  6. A. Basteris and F. Amirabdollahian, “Adaptive human-robot interaction based on lag-lead modelling for home-based stroke rehabilitation: Novel mechanisms for assessment and performance based adaptation of task difficulty,” in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.   IEEE, 2013, pp. 3414–3419.
  7. S. Wager and S. Athey, “Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 113, no. 523, pp. 1228–1242, 2018.
  8. D. B. Rubin, “Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.” Journal of educational Psychology, vol. 66, no. 5, p. 688, 1974.
  9. M. EconML, “Econml: A python package for ml-based heterogeneous treatment effects estimation,” 2019.
  10. N. Dennler, A. Cain, E. De Guzman, C. Chiu, C. J. Winstein, S. Nikolaidis, and M. J. Matarić, “A metric for characterizing the arm nonuse workspace in poststroke individuals using a robot arm,” Science Robotics, vol. 8, no. 84, p. eadf7723, 2023.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Whiteboard

Paper to Video (Beta)

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.