Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Regularized Benders Decomposition for High Performance Capacity Expansion Models

Published 5 Mar 2024 in math.OC | (2403.02559v2)

Abstract: We consider electricity capacity expansion models, which optimize investment and retirement decisions by minimizing both investment and operation costs. In order to provide credible support for planning and policy decisions, these models need to include detailed operations and time-coupling constraints, consider multiple possible realizations of weather-related parameters and demand data, and allow modeling of discrete investment and retirement decisions. Such requirements result in large-scale mixed-integer optimization problems that are intractable with off-the-shelf solvers. Hence, practical solution approaches often rely on carefully designed abstraction techniques to find the best compromise between reduced computational burden and model accuracy. Benders decomposition offers scalable approaches to leverage distributed computing resources and enable models with both high resolution and computational performance. In this study, we implement a tailored Benders decomposition method for large-scale capacity expansion models with multiple planning periods, stochastic operational scenarios, time-coupling policy constraints, and multi-day energy storage and reservoir hydro resources. Using multiple case studies, we also evaluate several level-set regularization schemes to accelerate convergence. We find that a regularization scheme that selects planning decisions in the interior of the feasible set shows superior performance compared to previously published methods, enabling high-resolution, mixed-integer planning problems with unprecedented computational performance.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. N. A. Sepulveda, J. D. Jenkins, A. Edington, D. S. Mallapragada, and R. K. Lester, “The design space for long-duration energy storage in decarbonized power systems,” Nature Energy, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 506–516, Mar. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-021-00796-8
  2. M. Victoria, E. Zeyen, and T. Brown, “Speed of technological transformations required in Europe to achieve different climate goals,” Joule, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1066–1086, May 2022. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2542435122001830
  3. W. Ricks, Q. Xu, and J. D. Jenkins, “Minimizing emissions from grid-based hydrogen production in the United States,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 014025, Jan. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/acacb5
  4. J. Bistline, G. Blanford, M. Brown, D. Burtraw, M. Domeshek, J. Farbes, A. Fawcett, A. Hamilton, J. Jenkins, R. Jones, B. King, H. Kolus, J. Larsen, A. Levin, M. Mahajan, C. Marcy, E. Mayfield, J. McFarland, H. McJeon, R. Orvis, N. Patankar, K. Rennert, C. Roney, N. Roy, G. Schivley, D. Steinberg, N. Victor, S. Wenzel, J. Weyant, R. Wiser, M. Yuan, and A. Zhao, “Emissions and energy impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act,” Science, vol. 380, no. 6652, pp. 1324–1327, Jun. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adg3781
  5. T. Levin, J. Bistline, R. Sioshansi, W. J. Cole, J. Kwon, S. P. Burger, G. W. Crabtree, J. D. Jenkins, R. O’Neil, M. Korpås, S. Wogrin, B. F. Hobbs, R. Rosner, V. Srinivasan, and A. Botterud, “Energy storage solutions to decarbonize electricity through enhanced capacity expansion modelling,” Nature Energy, Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-023-01340-6
  6. B. S. Palmintier and M. D. Webster, “Heterogeneous Unit Clustering for Efficient Operational Flexibility Modeling,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1089–1098, May 2014. [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6684593/
  7. K. Poncelet, E. Delarue, D. Six, J. Duerinck, and W. D’haeseleer, “Impact of the level of temporal and operational detail in energy-system planning models,” Applied Energy, vol. 162, pp. 631–643, Jan. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261915013276
  8. Q. Xu and B. F. Hobbs, “Value of model enhancements: quantifying the benefit of improved transmission planning models,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 2836–2845, Jul. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.6357
  9. M. M. Frysztacki, J. Hörsch, V. Hagenmeyer, and T. Brown, “The strong effect of network resolution on electricity system models with high shares of wind and solar,” Applied Energy, vol. 291, p. 116726, Jun. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306261921002439
  10. F. Munoz, B. Hobbs, and J.-P. Watson, “New bounding and decomposition approaches for MILP investment problems: Multi-area transmission and generation planning under policy constraints,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 248, no. 3, pp. 888–898, Feb. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0377221715007110
  11. T. Lohmann and S. Rebennack, “Tailored Benders Decomposition for a Long-Term Power Expansion Model with Short-Term Demand Response,” Management Science, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 2027–2048, Jun. 2017. [Online]. Available: http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2420
  12. C. L. Lara, D. S. Mallapragada, D. J. Papageorgiou, A. Venkatesh, and I. E. Grossmann, “Deterministic electric power infrastructure planning: Mixed-integer programming model and nested decomposition algorithm,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 271, no. 3, pp. 1037–1054, 2018, publisher: Elsevier B.V. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.05.039
  13. C. Li, A. J. Conejo, P. Liu, B. P. Omell, J. D. Siirola, and I. E. Grossmann, “Mixed-integer linear programming models and algorithms for generation and transmission expansion planning of power systems,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 297, no. 3, pp. 1071–1082, 2022, publisher: Elsevier B.V.
  14. N. Mazzi, A. Grothey, K. McKinnon, and N. Sugishita, “Benders decomposition with adaptive oracles for large scale optimization,” Mathematical Programming Computation, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 683–703, Dec. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12532-020-00197-0
  15. H. Zhang, I. E. Grossmann, B. R. Knudsen, K. McKinnon, R. G. Nava, and A. Tomasgard, “Integrated investment, retrofit and abandonment planning of energy systems with short-term and long-term uncertainty using enhanced Benders decomposition,” Mar. 2023, arXiv:2303.09927 [math]. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.09927
  16. L. Göke, Schmidt, Felix, and Kendziorski, Mario, “Stabilized Benders decomposition for energy planning under climate uncertainty,” European Journal of Operational Research, Jan. 2024.
  17. A. Jacobson, F. Pecci, N. Sepulveda, Q. Xu, and J. Jenkins, “A Computationally Efficient Benders Decomposition for Energy Systems Planning Problems with Detailed Operations and Time-Coupling Constraints,” INFORMS Journal on Optimization, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 32–45, Jan. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/ijoo.2023.0005
  18. A. Frangioni, “Generalized Bundle Methods,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 117–156, Jan. 2002. [Online]. Available: http://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/S1052623498342186
  19. J. Linderoth and S. Wright, “Decomposition Algorithms for Stochastic Programming on a Computational Grid,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 207–250, Feb. 2003. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021858008222
  20. C. Lemaréchal, A. Nemirovskii, and Y. Nesterov, “New variants of bundle methods,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 69, no. 1-3, pp. 111–147, Jul. 1995. [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF01585555
  21. J. Kronqvist, D. E. Bernal, and I. E. Grossmann, “Using regularization and second order information in outer approximation for convex MINLP,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 180, no. 1-2, pp. 285–310, Mar. 2020. [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10107-018-1356-3
  22. D. E. Bernal, Z. Peng, J. Kronqvist, and I. E. Grossmann, “Alternative regularizations for Outer-Approximation algorithms for convex MINLP,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 807–842, Dec. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10898-022-01178-4
  23. MIT Energy Initiative and Princeton University ZERO lab, “GenX: a configurable power system capacity expansion model for studying low-carbon energy futures.” [Online]. Available: https://genxproject.github.io/GenX/
  24. J. D. Jenkins and N. A. Sepulveda, “Enhanced Decision Support for a Changing Electricity Landscape: The GenX Configurable Electricity Resource Capacity Expansion Model,” MIT Energy Initiative, Tech. Rep. MITEI-WP-2017-10, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130589
  25. F. Neumann, V. Hagenmeyer, and T. Brown, “Assessments of linear power flow and transmission loss approximations in coordinated capacity expansion problems,” Applied Energy, vol. 314, p. 118859, May 2022. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306261922002938
  26. D. S. Mallapragada, N. A. Sepulveda, and J. D. Jenkins, “Long-run system value of battery energy storage in future grids with increasing wind and solar generation,” Applied Energy, vol. 275, p. 115390, Oct. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306261920309028
  27. J. Gondzio, R. Sarkissian, and J.-P. Vial, “Using an interior point method for the master problem in a decomposition approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 577–587, Sep. 1997. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0377221796001828
  28. J. Gondzio, P. González-Brevis, and P. Munari, “New developments in the primal–dual column generation technique,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 224, no. 1, pp. 41–51, Jan. 2013. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0377221712005656
  29. Greg Schivley, “PowerGenome.” [Online]. Available: https://github.com/PowerGenome/PowerGenome
  30. Gurobi Optimization, “Gurobi Optimizer 10.1,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.gurobi.com/
  31. J. Bezanson, A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. Shah, “Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing,” SIAM Review, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 65–98, 2017, arXiv: 1411.1607.
  32. M. Lubin, O. Dowson, J. D. Garcia, J. Huchette, B. Legat, and J. P. Vielma, “JuMP 1.0: recent improvements to a modeling language for mathematical optimization,” Mathematical Programming Computation, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 581–589, Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12532-023-00239-3
  33. G. Zakeri, A. B. Philpott, and D. M. Ryan, “Inexact Cuts in Benders Decomposition,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 643–657, Jan. 2000. [Online]. Available: http://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/S1052623497318700
  34. D. S. Mallapragada, D. J. Papageorgiou, A. Venkatesh, C. L. Lara, and I. E. Grossmann, “Impact of model resolution on scenario outcomes for electricity sector system expansion,” Energy, vol. 163, pp. 1231–1244, Nov. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360544218315238
  35. J. H. Williams, R. A. Jones, B. Haley, G. Kwok, J. Hargreaves, J. Farbes, and M. S. Torn, “Carbon-Neutral Pathways for the United States,” AGU Advances, vol. 2, no. 1, p. e2020AV000284, 2021, _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2020AV000284. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2020AV000284
  36. E. Larson, C. Greig, J. Jenkins, E. Mayfield, A. Pascale, C. Zhang, J. Drossman, R. Williams, S. Pacala, R. Socolow, E. Baik, R. Birdsey, R. Duke, R. Jones, B. Haley, E. Leslie, K. Paustian, and A. Swang, “Net Zero America: Potential Pathways, Infrastructure, and Impacts,” Tech. Rep., 2021, annex A.2. [Online]. Available: https://netzeroamerica.princeton.edu/the-report
  37. J. Ho, J. Becker, M. Brown, P. Brown, I. Chernyakhovskiy, S. Cohen, W. Cole, S. Corcoran, K. Eurek, W. Frazier, P. Gagnon, N. Gates, D. Greer, P. Jadun, S. Khanal, S. Machen, M. Macmillan, T. Mai, M. Mowers, C. Murphy, A. Rose, A. Schleifer, B. Sergi, D. Steinberg, Y. Sun, and E. Zhou, “Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) Model Documentation: Version 2020,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Tech. Rep. NREL/TP- 6A20-78195, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/78195.pdf
  38. J. E. T. Bistline, “The importance of temporal resolution in modeling deep decarbonization of the electric power sector,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 16, no. 8, p. 084005, Aug. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac10df
  39. K. Hunter, S. Sreepathi, and J. F. DeCarolis, “Modeling for insight using Tools for Energy Model Optimization and Analysis (Temoa),” Energy Economics, vol. 40, pp. 339–349, Nov. 2013. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S014098831300159X
Citations (2)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 4 likes about this paper.