Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Modular Blind Video Quality Assessment (2402.19276v4)

Published 29 Feb 2024 in eess.IV and cs.CV

Abstract: Blind video quality assessment (BVQA) plays a pivotal role in evaluating and improving the viewing experience of end-users across a wide range of video-based platforms and services. Contemporary deep learning-based models primarily analyze video content in its aggressively subsampled format, while being blind to the impact of the actual spatial resolution and frame rate on video quality. In this paper, we propose a modular BVQA model and a method of training it to improve its modularity. Our model comprises a base quality predictor, a spatial rectifier, and a temporal rectifier, responding to the visual content and distortion, spatial resolution, and frame rate changes on video quality, respectively. During training, spatial and temporal rectifiers are dropped out with some probabilities to render the base quality predictor a standalone BVQA model, which should work better with the rectifiers. Extensive experiments on both professionally-generated content and user-generated content video databases show that our quality model achieves superior or comparable performance to current methods. Additionally, the modularity of our model offers an opportunity to analyze existing video quality databases in terms of their spatial and temporal complexity.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (45)
  1. QoE evaluation for live broadcasting video. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pages 454–458, 2019.
  2. Sathya Veera Reddy Dendi and Sumohana S. Channappayya. No-reference video quality assessment using natural spatiotemporal scene statistics. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 29:5612–5624, 2020.
  3. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 248–255, 2009.
  4. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  5. SlowFast networks for video recognition. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 6202–6211, 2019.
  6. In-capture mobile video distortions: A study of subjective behavior and objective algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 28(9):2061–2077, 2018.
  7. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 770–778, 2016.
  8. The Konstanz natural video database (KoNViD-1k). In IEEE International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience, pages 1–6, 2017.
  9. QoE as a function of frame rate and resolution changes. In International Workshop on Future Multimedia Networking, pages 34–45. Springer, 2010.
  10. SCSampler: Sampling salient clips from video for efficient action recognition. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 6232–6242, 2019.
  11. Jari Korhonen. Two-level approach for no-reference consumer video quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 28(12):5923–5938, 2019.
  12. Blind natural video quality prediction via statistical temporal features and deep spatial features. In ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 3311–3319, 2020.
  13. A subjective and objective study of space-time subsampled video quality. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 31:934–948, 2021.
  14. Blindly assess quality of in-the-wild videos via quality-aware pre-training and motion perception. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 32(9):5944–5958, 2022.
  15. Quality assessment of in-the-wild videos. In ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 2351–2359, 2019a.
  16. AVC, HEVC, VP9, AVS2 or AV1?—A comparative study of state-of-the-art video encoders on 4K videos. In International Conference on Image Analysis and Recognition, pages 162–173, 2019b.
  17. A ConvNet for the 2020s. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11976–11986, 2022.
  18. Deep neural network for blind visual quality assessment of 4K content. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 69(2):406–421, 2023.
  19. A study of subjective video quality at various spatial resolutions. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pages 2830–2834, 2018a.
  20. A study of high frame rate video formats. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 21(6):1499–1512, 2018b.
  21. Subjective and objective quality assessment of high frame rate videos. IEEE Access, 9:108069–108082, 2021.
  22. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 21(12):4695–4708, 2012.
  23. Making a “completely blind” image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 20(3):209–212, 2013.
  24. A completely blind video integrity oracle. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 25(1):289–300, 2016.
  25. Perceptual quality assessment of high frame rate video. In IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, pages 1–6, 2015.
  26. CVD2014—A database for evaluating no-reference video quality assessment algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 25(7):3073–3086, 2016.
  27. Modeling the impact of frame rate and quantization stepsizes and their temporal variations on perceptual video quality: A review of recent works. In Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, pages 1–6, 2010.
  28. Q-STAR: A perceptual video quality model considering impact of spatial, temporal, and amplitude resolutions. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 23(6):2473–2486, 2014.
  29. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8748–8763, 2021.
  30. AVT-VQDB-UHD-1: A large scale video quality database for UHD-1. In IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia, pages 17–177, 2019.
  31. Blind prediction of natural video quality. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 23(3):1352–1365, 2014.
  32. Large-scale study of perceptual video quality. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 28(2):612–627, 2018.
  33. A deep learning based no-reference quality assessment model for ugc videos. In ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 856–865, 2022.
  34. Analysis of video quality datasets via design of minimalistic video quality models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13981, 2023.
  35. UGC-VQA: Benchmarking blind video quality assessment for user generated content. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 30:4449–4464, 2021a.
  36. RAPIQUE: Rapid and accurate video quality prediction of user generated content. IEEE Open Journal of Signal Processing, 2:425–440, 2021b.
  37. YouTube UGC dataset for video compression research. In IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, pages 1–5, 2019.
  38. Rich features for perceptual quality assessment of UGC videos. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 13435–13444, 2021.
  39. FAST-VQA: Efficient end-to-end video quality assessment with fragment sampling. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 538–554, 2022.
  40. Exploring video quality assessment on user generated contents from aesthetic and technical perspectives. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 20144–20154, 2023.
  41. Attention based network for no-reference UGC video quality assessment. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pages 1414–1418, 2021.
  42. Patch-VQ: ‘Patching up’ the video quality problem. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14019–14029, 2021.
  43. Subjective quality assessment of user-generated content gaming videos. In IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 74–83, 2022.
  44. Cross-dimensional perceptual quality assessment for low bit-rate videos. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 10(7):1316–1324, 2008.
  45. No-reference quality assessment of variable frame-rate videos using temporal bandpass statistics. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech & Signal Processing, pages 1795–1799, 2022.
Citations (6)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.