Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Dynamical Regimes of Diffusion Models

Published 28 Feb 2024 in cs.LG and cond-mat.stat-mech | (2402.18491v1)

Abstract: Using statistical physics methods, we study generative diffusion models in the regime where the dimension of space and the number of data are large, and the score function has been trained optimally. Our analysis reveals three distinct dynamical regimes during the backward generative diffusion process. The generative dynamics, starting from pure noise, encounters first a 'speciation' transition where the gross structure of data is unraveled, through a mechanism similar to symmetry breaking in phase transitions. It is followed at later time by a 'collapse' transition where the trajectories of the dynamics become attracted to one of the memorized data points, through a mechanism which is similar to the condensation in a glass phase. For any dataset, the speciation time can be found from a spectral analysis of the correlation matrix, and the collapse time can be found from the estimation of an 'excess entropy' in the data. The dependence of the collapse time on the dimension and number of data provides a thorough characterization of the curse of dimensionality for diffusion models. Analytical solutions for simple models like high-dimensional Gaussian mixtures substantiate these findings and provide a theoretical framework, while extensions to more complex scenarios and numerical validations with real datasets confirm the theoretical predictions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (51)
  1. Stochastic interpolants: A unifying framework for flows and diffusions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08797, 2023.
  2. Luca Ambrogioni. The statistical thermodynamics of generative diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.17467, 2023.
  3. Lumiere: A space-time diffusion model for video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12945, 2024.
  4. Limit theorems for sums of random exponentials. Probability theory and related fields, 132:579–612, 2005.
  5. Linear convergence bounds for diffusion models via stochastic localization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03686, 2023.
  6. Theoretical perspective on the glass transition and amorphous materials. Reviews of modern physics, 83(2):587, 2011.
  7. Generative diffusion in very large dimensions. J. Stat. Mech., page 093402, 2023.
  8. High-dimensional non-convex landscapes and gradient descent dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03754, 2023.
  9. Time reversal of diffusion processes under a finite entropy condition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.07708, 2021.
  10. Principles of condensed matter physics, volume 10. Cambridge university press Cambridge, 1995a.
  11. Principles of condensed matter physics, volume 10. Cambridge university press Cambridge, 1995b.
  12. Spin Glass Theory and Far Beyond: Replica Symmetry Breaking after 40 Years. World Scientific, 2023.
  13. Sampling is as easy as learning the score: theory for diffusion models with minimal data assumptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.11215, 2022.
  14. A downsampled variant of imagenet as an alternative to the cifar datasets, 2017.
  15. Score diffusion models without early stopping: finite fisher information is all you need. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12240, 2023.
  16. Analysis of learning a flow-based generative model from limited sample complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03575, 2023.
  17. Valentin De Bortoli. Convergence of denoising diffusion models under the manifold hypothesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.05314, 2022.
  18. Diffusion schrödinger bridge with applications to score-based generative modeling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:17695–17709, 2021.
  19. Bernard Derrida. Random-energy model: An exactly solvable model of disordered systems. Physical Review B, 24(5):2613, 1981.
  20. David L Donoho et al. High-dimensional data analysis: The curses and blessings of dimensionality. AMS math challenges lecture, 1(2000):32, 2000.
  21. Sampling with flows, diffusion and autoregressive neural networks: A spin-glass perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14085, 2023.
  22. Wavelet score-based generative modeling, 2022.
  23. Time reversal of diffusions. The Annals of Probability, pages 1188–1205, 1986.
  24. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 770–778, 2016. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.
  25. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020.
  26. Estimation of non-normalized statistical models by score matching. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6(4), 2005.
  27. Generalization in diffusion models arises from geometry-adaptive harmonic representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02557, 2023.
  28. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. Toronto, ON, Canada, 2009.
  29. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11):2278–2324, 1998. doi: 10.1109/5.726791.
  30. Convergence for score-based generative modeling with polynomial complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.06227, 2022.
  31. The exponential capacity of dense associative memories. Phys.Rev.Lett, 132:077301, 2024.
  32. Calvin Luo. Understanding diffusion models: A unified perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.11970, 2022.
  33. Information, physics, and computation. Oxford University Press, 2009.
  34. Spin glass theory and beyond: An Introduction to the Replica Method and Its Applications, volume 9. World Scientific Publishing Company, 1987.
  35. Advanced mean field methods: Theory and practice. MIT press, 2001.
  36. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, pages 8024–8035. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
  37. Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988, 2022.
  38. Vladimir Privman. Finite size scaling and numerical simulation of statistical systems. World Scientific, 1990.
  39. Spontaneous symmetry breaking in generative diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.19693, 2023.
  40. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18, pages 234–241. Springer, 2015.
  41. David Ruelle. A mathematical reformulation of derrida’s rem and grem. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 108:225–239, 1987.
  42. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:36479–36494, 2022.
  43. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2015.
  44. Denoising diffusion implicit models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020.
  45. Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019.
  46. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  47. Pascal Vincent. A connection between score matching and denoising autoencoders. Neural computation, 23(7):1661–1674, 2011.
  48. Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.00796, 2022.
  49. Diffusion probabilistic models generalize when they fail to memorize. In ICML 2023 Workshop on Structured Probabilistic Inference {normal-{\{{\normal-\\backslash\&}normal-}\}} Generative Modeling, 2023.
  50. Lsun: Construction of a large-scale image dataset using deep learning with humans in the loop, 2016.
  51. Jean Zinn-Justin. Quantum field theory and critical phenomena, volume 171. Oxford university press, 2021.
Citations (23)

Summary

  • The paper reveals three distinct dynamical regimes in the backward process of generative diffusion models using rigorous statistical physics analysis.
  • It identifies a speciation transition and a subsequent collapse phase, with the novel 'excess entropy density' metric signaling the onset of memorization.
  • These insights offer actionable guidance for optimizing training and regularization strategies to balance data structure emergence and overfitting.

Unveiling the Dynamics of Generative Diffusion Models through the Lens of Statistical Physics

Introduction

Generative Diffusion Models (DMs) have made significant strides in modeling complex data distributions, notably excelling in generating realistic samples across various domains, such as images, audio, and 3D scenes. Despite their applied success, a comprehensive theoretical understanding of these models, especially in high-dimensional settings typical of real-world data, remains elusive. Addressing this gap, the paper "Dynamical Regimes of Diffusion Models" embarks on a scholarly investigation using tools from statistical physics to dissect the operational dynamics of generative diffusion models. This study is pivotal, revealing three distinct dynamical regimes during the backward generative diffusion process, each marking a fundamental phase in the data generation journey from random noise to structured data points.

The Dynamical Regimes

The backward process in DMs begins with noise and undergoes transitions through three identified regimes:

  1. Initial Brownian Motion: The process starts with trajectories exhibiting Brownian behavior without preference for any data structure.
  2. Speciation Transition: Marked by a distinct cross-over, this phase sees trajectories diverging towards main categories or 'species' of data, a clear indication of structure emergence from randomness. Analytically predicted, this transition correlates with certain spectral properties of the data's correlation matrix, akin to phase transitions known in physics.
  3. Collapse Transition: The final regime is characterized by a 'collapse' where trajectories converge to specific data points from the training set, effectively transitioning from generalization to memorization. The paper provides a novel method to estimate the onset of this phase, introducing a metric known as the 'excess entropy density' as a crucial determinant.

These regimes are not merely theoretical constructs but are substantiated by rigorous analytical solutions and numerical validations against benchmark datasets like CIFAR-10, ImageNet, and LSUN, confirming the universality of these dynamical phases across different data types.

Implications and Future Directions

Understanding these regimes has profound implications both theoretically and practically. Theoretically, it extends our knowledge of the operational underpinnings of diffusion models, adding a significant chapter in the ongoing narrative of blending machine learning with statistical physics. Practically, recognizing these transitions can guide the design of more efficient training and regularization strategies, potentially alleviating issues like overfitting and ensuring a balanced representation of data classes.

The study also highlights the inherent 'curse of dimensionality' faced by diffusion models, necessitating an exponentially large dataset size to avoid collapsing onto the training data prematurely. It suggests regularization and approximate score learning as viable paths to circumvent these limitations, sparking a dialogue on optimizing diffusion model training for real-world applications.

Looking ahead, the paper calls for further exploration beyond the 'exact empirical score' hypothesis and the role of regularization. It lays the groundwork for future studies to quantitatively assess model capacity, data dimensionality, and the number of samples in mitigating or exacerbating the memorization phenomenon. Moreover, it opens interesting avenues for leveraging volume arguments and the connection between speciation, collapse, and glass transitions in physics to refine our understanding and application of generative diffusion models.

In conclusion, "Dynamical Regimes of Diffusion Models" stands as a seminal contribution to the field of generative modeling, unlocking new perspectives on the interplay between machine learning and statistical physics. By charting the dynamic landscape of generative diffusion processes, it not only advances theoretical foundations but also steers practical advancements in generative AI.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 8 tweets with 766 likes about this paper.