2000 character limit reached
Social Learning with Intrinsic Preferences (2402.18452v1)
Published 28 Feb 2024 in econ.GN and q-fin.EC
Abstract: Despite strong evidence for peer effects, little is known about how individuals balance intrinsic preferences and social learning in different choice environments. Using a combination of experiments and discrete choice modeling, we show that intrinsic preferences and social learning jointly influence participants' decisions, but their relative importance varies across choice tasks and environments. Intrinsic preferences guide participants' decisions in a subjective choice task, while social learning determines participants' decisions in a task with an objectively correct solution. A choice environment in which people expect to be rewarded for their choices reinforces the influence of intrinsic preferences, whereas an environment in which people expect to be punished for their choices reinforces conformist social learning. We use simulations to discuss the implications of these findings for the polarization of behavior.
- Akerlof, G. A. (1980): “A Theory of Social Custom, of which Unemployment may be One Consequence*,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94, 749–775.
- Alessie, R. and A. Kapteyn (1991): “Habit Formation, Interdependent Preferences and Demographic Effects in the Almost Ideal Demand System,” The Economic Journal, 101, 404–419.
- Allcott, H. (2011): “Social norms and energy conservation,” Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1082 – 1095.
- Allcott, H. and T. Rogers (2014): “The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation,” American Economic Review, 104, 3003–37.
- Alpizar, F., F. Carlsson, and O. Johansson-Stenman (2008): “Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica,” Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1047 – 1060.
- Aplin, L. M., B. C. Sheldon, and R. McElreath (2017): “Conformity does not perpetuate suboptimal traditions in a wild population of songbirds,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 7830–7837.
- Asch, S. E. (1956): “Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority,” Psychological Monographs, 70.
- Barrett, B. J., R. L. McElreath, and S. E. Perry (2017): “Pay-off-biased social learning underlies the diffusion of novel extractive foraging traditions in a wild primate,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20170358.
- Bénabou, R. and J. Tirole (2002): “Self-Confidence and Personal Motivation*,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 871–915.
- Bénabou, R. and J. Tirole (2006): “Incentives and prosocial behavior,” American Economic Review, 96, 1652–1678.
- Bernheim, B. D. (1994): “A Theory of Conformity,” Journal of Political Economy, 102, 841–877.
- Betancourt, M. (2013): “A General Metric for Riemannian Manifold Hamiltonian Monte Carlo,” in Geometric Science of Information, ed. by F. Nielsen and F. Barbaresco, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 327–334.
- Bobek, D., R. Roberts, and J. Sweeney (2007): “The social norms of tax compliance: evidence from Australia, Singapore and the United States,” Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 49–64.
- Bock, O., I. Baetge, and A. Nicklisch (2014): “hroot: Hamburg Registration and Organization Online Tool,” European Economic Review, 71, 117–120.
- Bond, M. H. and P. B. Smith (1996): “Cross-Cultural Social and Organizational Psychology,” Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 205–235, pMID: 15012481.
- Coleman, S. (2007): “The Minnesota Income Tax Compliance Experiment: Replication of the Social Norms Experiment,” Tech. rep., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1393292 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1393292.
- Deffner, D., V. Kleinow, and R. McElreath (2020): “Dynamic social learning in temporally and spatially variable environments,” Royal Society Open Science, 7, 200734.
- Duch, M. L., M. R. Grossmann, and T. Lauer (2020): “z-Tree unleashed: A novel client-integrating architecture for conducting z-Tree experiments over the Internet,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 28, 100400.
- Dvorak, F., U. Fischbacher, and K. Schmelz (2020): “Incentives for Conformity and Anticonformity,” Tech. Rep. TWI Working Paper 122, Available here: https://fdvorak.com/papers/Dvorak-Fischbacher-Schmelz-Incentives-for-Conformity-and-Anticonformity.pdf.
- Efferson, C., R. Lalive, P. J. Richerson, R. McElreath, and M. Lubell (2008): “Conformists and mavericks: the empirics of frequency-dependent cultural transmission,” Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 56–64.
- Efferson, C., S. Vogt, and E. Fehr (2020): “The promise and the peril of using social influence to reverse harmful traditions,” Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 55–68.
- Fischbacher, U. (2007): “Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments,” Experimental Economics, 10, 171–178.
- Gaertner, W. (1974): “A Dynamic Model of Interdependent Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Economics, 34, 327–344.
- Granovetter, M. (1978): “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior,” American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1420–1443.
- Köszegi, B. (2006): “Ego Utility, Overconfidence, and Task Choice,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, 673–707.
- Lewandowski, D., D. Kurowicka, and H. Joe (2009): “Generating random correlation matrices based on vines and extended onion method,” Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100, 1989–2001.
- Luce, R. D. (1959): “On the possible psychophysical laws,” Psychological Review, 66, 81–95.
- Manski, C. F. (1993): “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem,” The Review of Economic Studies, 60, 531–542.
- McElreath, R., A. V. Bell, C. Efferson, M. Lubell, P. J. Richerson, and T. Waring (2008): “Beyond existence and aiming outside the laboratory: estimating frequency-dependent and pay-off-biased social learning strategies,” Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 363, 3515–3528.
- McElreath, R., M. Lubell, P. J. Richerson, T. M. Waring, W. Baum, E. Edsten, C. Efferson, and B. Paciotti (2005): “Applying evolutionary models to the laboratory study of social learning,” Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 483–508.
- Mullen, B., J. L. Atkins, D. S. Champion, C. Edwards, D. Hardy, J. E. Story, and M. Vanderklok (1985): “The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 262–283.
- Nolan, J. M., P. W. Schultz, R. B. Cialdini, N. J. Goldstein, and V. Griskevicius (2008): “Normative Social Influence is Underdetected,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913–923, pMID: 18550863.
- Pollak, R. A. (1976): “Interdependent Preferences,” The American Economic Review, 66, 309–320.
- Sasaki, S. (2019): “Majority size and conformity behavior in charitable giving: Field evidence from a donation-based crowdfunding platform in Japan,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 70, 36–51.
- Schelling, T. C. (1971): “Dynamic models of segregation,” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–186.
- Schultz, P. W., J. M. Nolan, R. B. Cialdini, N. J. Goldstein, and V. Griskevicius (2007): “The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms,” Psychological Science, 18, 429–434.
- Smerdon, D., T. Offerman, and U. Gneezy (2020): “Everybody’s doing it: on the persistence of bad social norms,” Experimental Economics, 23, 392–420.
- Smith, S., F. Windmeijer, and E. Wright (2015): “Peer Effects in Charitable Giving: Evidence from the (Running) Field,” The Economic Journal, 125, 1053–1071.
- Stan Development Team (2020): “RStan: the R interface to Stan,” R package version 2.21.2.
- ——— (2021): Stan Modeling Language Users Guide and Reference Manual, 2.28.
- Toyokawa, W. and W. Gaissmaier (2021): “Conformist social learning leads to self-organised prevention against adverse bias in risky decision making,” bioRxiv.
- Toyokawa, W., A. Whalen, and K. N. Laland (2019): “Social learning strategies regulate the wisdom and madness of interactive crowds,” Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 183–193.
- Vehtari, A., A. Gelman, and J. Gabry (2017): “Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC,” Statistics and Computing, 27, 1413–1432.
- Watanabe, S. (2010): “Asymptotic equivalence of Bayes cross validation and widely applicable information criterion in singular learning theory .” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 3571–3594.
- Zimmermann, F. (2020): “The Dynamics of Motivated Beliefs,” American Economic Review, 110, 337–61.
Sponsored by Paperpile, the PDF & BibTeX manager trusted by top AI labs.
Get 30 days freePaper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.