Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Projected state ensemble of a generic model of many-body quantum chaos

Published 26 Feb 2024 in quant-ph and cond-mat.stat-mech | (2402.16939v2)

Abstract: The projected ensemble is based on the study of the quantum state of a subsystem $A$ conditioned on projective measurements in its complement. Recent studies have observed that a more refined measure of the thermalization of a chaotic quantum system can be defined on the basis of convergence of the projected ensemble to a quantum state design, i.e. a system thermalizes when it becomes indistinguishable, up to the $k$-th moment, from a Haar ensemble of uniformly distributed pure states. Here we consider a random unitary circuit with the brick-wall geometry and analyze its convergence to the Haar ensemble through the frame potential and its mapping to a statistical mechanical problem. This approach allows us to highlight a geometric interpretation of the frame potential based on the existence of a fluctuating membrane, similar to those appearing in the study of entanglement entropies. At large local Hilbert space dimension $q$, we find that all moments converge simultaneously with a time scaling linearly in the size of region $A$, a feature previously observed in dual unitary models. However, based on the geometric interpretation, we argue that the scaling at finite $q$ on the basis of rare membrane fluctuations, finding the logarithmic scaling of design times $t_k = O(\log k)$. Our results are supported with numerical simulations performed at $q=2$.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. M. Cazalilla and M. Rigol, New J. Phys. 12, 055006 (2010).
  2. M. L. Mehta, Random Matrices (Academic Press, 2004).
  3. J. M. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991).
  4. M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).
  5. M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, PRX Quantum 4, 030322 (2023).
  6. H. Shrotriya and W. W. Ho, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.08437  (2023).
  7. W. W. Ho and S. Choi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 060601 (2022).
  8. P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Quantum 6, 738 (2022).
  9. A. Ambainis and J. Emerson, in Twenty-Second Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC’07) (IEEE, 2007) pp. 129–140.
  10. H. Wilming and I. Roth, arXiv:2202.01669  (2022).
  11. M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, Quantum 6, 886 (2022).
  12. J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016).
  13. H. Kim and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127205 (2013a).
  14. T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031066 (2020).
  15. I. Corwin, Random Matrices: Theory and Applications 01, 1130001 (2012).
  16. T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Phys. Rev. B 99, 174205 (2019).
  17. M. Knap, Phys. Rev. B 98, 184416 (2018).
  18. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The theory of open quantum systems (Oxford University Press, USA, 2002).
  19. A. Nahum and K. J. Wiese, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07848  (2023).
  20. G. Giachetti and A. De Luca, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.12166  (2023).
  21. P. W. Brouwer and C. W. J. Beenakker, Journal of Mathematical Physics 37, 4904 (1996).
  22. B. Collins, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2003, 953 (2003).
  23. H. Kim and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127205 (2013b).
  24. D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291 (1993).
  25. M. Blake and A. P. Thompson, “The page curve from the entanglement membrane,”  (2023), arXiv:2306.13140 [hep-th] .
  26. M. Kardar, Nuclear Physics B 290, 582 (1987).
  27. V. Dotsenko, Europhysics Letters 90, 20003 (2010).
  28. T. Sasamoto and H. Spohn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 230602 (2010).
Citations (5)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.