Projected state ensemble of a generic model of many-body quantum chaos
Abstract: The projected ensemble is based on the study of the quantum state of a subsystem $A$ conditioned on projective measurements in its complement. Recent studies have observed that a more refined measure of the thermalization of a chaotic quantum system can be defined on the basis of convergence of the projected ensemble to a quantum state design, i.e. a system thermalizes when it becomes indistinguishable, up to the $k$-th moment, from a Haar ensemble of uniformly distributed pure states. Here we consider a random unitary circuit with the brick-wall geometry and analyze its convergence to the Haar ensemble through the frame potential and its mapping to a statistical mechanical problem. This approach allows us to highlight a geometric interpretation of the frame potential based on the existence of a fluctuating membrane, similar to those appearing in the study of entanglement entropies. At large local Hilbert space dimension $q$, we find that all moments converge simultaneously with a time scaling linearly in the size of region $A$, a feature previously observed in dual unitary models. However, based on the geometric interpretation, we argue that the scaling at finite $q$ on the basis of rare membrane fluctuations, finding the logarithmic scaling of design times $t_k = O(\log k)$. Our results are supported with numerical simulations performed at $q=2$.
- M. Cazalilla and M. Rigol, New J. Phys. 12, 055006 (2010).
- M. L. Mehta, Random Matrices (Academic Press, 2004).
- J. M. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991).
- M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).
- M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, PRX Quantum 4, 030322 (2023).
- H. Shrotriya and W. W. Ho, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.08437 (2023).
- W. W. Ho and S. Choi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 060601 (2022).
- P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Quantum 6, 738 (2022).
- A. Ambainis and J. Emerson, in Twenty-Second Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC’07) (IEEE, 2007) pp. 129–140.
- H. Wilming and I. Roth, arXiv:2202.01669 (2022).
- M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, Quantum 6, 886 (2022).
- J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016).
- H. Kim and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127205 (2013a).
- T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031066 (2020).
- I. Corwin, Random Matrices: Theory and Applications 01, 1130001 (2012).
- T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Phys. Rev. B 99, 174205 (2019).
- M. Knap, Phys. Rev. B 98, 184416 (2018).
- H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The theory of open quantum systems (Oxford University Press, USA, 2002).
- A. Nahum and K. J. Wiese, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07848 (2023).
- G. Giachetti and A. De Luca, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.12166 (2023).
- P. W. Brouwer and C. W. J. Beenakker, Journal of Mathematical Physics 37, 4904 (1996).
- B. Collins, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2003, 953 (2003).
- H. Kim and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127205 (2013b).
- D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291 (1993).
- M. Blake and A. P. Thompson, “The page curve from the entanglement membrane,” (2023), arXiv:2306.13140 [hep-th] .
- M. Kardar, Nuclear Physics B 290, 582 (1987).
- V. Dotsenko, Europhysics Letters 90, 20003 (2010).
- T. Sasamoto and H. Spohn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 230602 (2010).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.