An optimal tradeoff between entanglement and copy complexity for state tomography
Abstract: There has been significant interest in understanding how practical constraints on contemporary quantum devices impact the complexity of quantum learning. For the classic question of tomography, recent work tightly characterized the copy complexity for any protocol that can only measure one copy of the unknown state at a time, showing it is polynomially worse than if one can make fully-entangled measurements. While we now have a fairly complete picture of the rates for such tasks in the near-term and fault-tolerant regimes, it remains poorly understood what the landscape in between looks like. In this work, we study tomography in the natural setting where one can make measurements of $t$ copies at a time. For sufficiently small $\epsilon$, we show that for any $t \le d2$, $\widetilde{\Theta}(\frac{d3}{\sqrt{t}\epsilon2})$ copies are necessary and sufficient to learn an unknown $d$-dimensional state $\rho$ to trace distance $\epsilon$. This gives a smooth and optimal interpolation between the known rates for single-copy and fully-entangled measurements. To our knowledge, this is the first smooth entanglement-copy tradeoff known for any quantum learning task, and for tomography, no intermediate point on this curve was known, even at $t = 2$. An important obstacle is that unlike the optimal single-copy protocol, the optimal fully-entangled protocol is inherently biased and thus precludes naive batching approaches. Instead, we devise a novel two-stage procedure that uses Keyl's algorithm to refine a crude estimate for $\rho$ based on single-copy measurements. A key insight is to use Schur-Weyl sampling not to estimate the spectrum of $\rho$, but to estimate the deviation of $\rho$ from the maximally mixed state. When $\rho$ is far from the maximally mixed state, we devise a novel quantum splitting procedure that reduces to the case where $\rho$ is close to maximally mixed.
- Quantum algorithmic measurement. Nature communications, 13(1):1–9, 2022.
- Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature, 574(7779):505–510, 2019.
- Improved quantum data analysis. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 1398–1411, 2021.
- Entanglement is necessary for optimal quantum property testing. In 2020 IEEE 61st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 692–703. IEEE, 2020.
- Matthias C Caro. Learning quantum processes and hamiltonians via the pauli transfer matrix. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04471, 2022.
- When does adaptivity help for quantum state learning? In 2023 IEEE 64th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 391–404, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, nov 2023. IEEE Computer Society.
- Tight bounds on pauli channel learning without entanglement, 2023.
- Quantum advantages for pauli channel estimation. Physical Review A, 105(3):032435, 2022.
- A hierarchy for replica quantum advantage. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.05874, 2021.
- Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memory. In 2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 574–585. IEEE, 2022.
- Futility and utility of a few ancillas for pauli channel learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.14326, 2023.
- Tight bounds for quantum state certification with incoherent measurements. In 2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 1205–1213, 2022.
- Toward instance-optimal state certification with incoherent measurements. In Po-Ling Loh and Maxim Raginsky, editors, Proceedings of Thirty Fifth Conference on Learning Theory, volume 178 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 2541–2596. PMLR, 02–05 Jul 2022.
- A new approach for testing properties of discrete distributions. In 2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 685–694. IEEE, 2016.
- Quantum channel certification with incoherent measurements. In Gergely Neu and Lorenzo Rosasco, editors, Proceedings of Thirty Sixth Conference on Learning Theory, volume 195 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 1822–1884. PMLR, 12–15 Jul 2023.
- Symmetry, representations, and invariants, volume 255. Springer, 2009.
- Fast state tomography with optimal error bounds. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 53(20):204001, 2020.
- Sample-optimal tomography of quantum states. In Proceedings of the forty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 913–925, 2016.
- Aram W. Harrow. The church of the symmetric subspace, 2013.
- Quantum advantage in learning from experiments. Science, 376(6598):1182–1186, 2022.
- Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system. Nature, 528(7580):77–83, 2015.
- M. Keyl and R. F. Werner. Estimating the spectrum of a density operator. Physical Review A, 64(5), October 2001.
- Michael Keyl. Quantum state estimation and large deviations. Reviews in Mathematical Physics, 18(01):19–60, 2006.
- Low rank matrix recovery from rank one measurements. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 42(1):88–116, 2017.
- Measuring the rényi entropy of a two-site fermi-hubbard model on a trapped ion quantum computer. Physical Review A, 98(5):052334, 2018.
- Memory-sample lower bounds for learning with classical-quantum hybrid memory. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2023, page 1097–1110, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery.
- Ashley Montanaro. Learning stabilizer states by bell sampling, 2017.
- Quantum computation and quantum information, 2002.
- Quantum spectrum testing. In Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 529–538, 2015.
- Efficient quantum tomography. In Proceedings of the forty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 899–912, 2016.
- Efficient quantum tomography ii. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 962–974, 2017.
- Dan Romik. The surprising mathematics of longest increasing subsequences. Number 4. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
- Bruce E Sagan. The symmetric group: representations, combinatorial algorithms, and symmetric functions, volume 203. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
- John Wright. How to learn a quantum state. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2016.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.