Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Weak Poincaré inequality comparisons for ideal and hybrid slice sampling

Published 21 Feb 2024 in stat.CO, math.PR, and stat.ME | (2402.13678v1)

Abstract: Using the framework of weak Poincar{\'e} inequalities, we provide a general comparison between the Hybrid and Ideal Slice Sampling Markov chains in terms of their Dirichlet forms. In particular, under suitable assumptions Hybrid Slice Sampling will inherit fast convergence from Ideal Slice Sampling and conversely. We apply our results to analyse the convergence of the Independent Metropolis--Hastings, Slice Sampling with Stepping-Out and Shrinkage, and Hit-and-Run-within-Slice Sampling algorithms.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. Uniform ergodicity of the iterated conditional SMC and geometric ergodicity of particle Gibbs samplers. Bernoulli, 24(2):842–872, 2018. doi: 10.3150/15-BEJ785.
  2. Comparison of Markov chains via weak Poincaré inequalities with application to pseudo-marginal MCMC. The Annals of Statistics, 50(6):3592–3618, 2022a.
  3. Poincaré inequalities for Markov chains: a meeting with Cheeger, Lyapunov and Metropolis. Technical report, University of Bristol, 2022b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.05239v1.
  4. Explicit convergence bounds for Metropolis Markov chains: isoperimetry, spectral gaps and profiles. 2022c. doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2211.08959. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.08959v1.
  5. Weak Poincaré Inequalities for Markov chains: theory and applications. 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11689v1.
  6. Peter H. Baxendale. Renewal theory and computable convergence rates for geometrically ergodic Markov chains. The Annals of Applied Probability, 15(1B):700–738, 2005. ISSN 1050-5164. doi: 10.1214/105051604000000710.
  7. Fast MCMC sampling algorithms on polytopes. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 19(1):2146–2231, 2018.
  8. Sinho Chewi. Log-concave sampling. Book draft available at https://chewisinho. github. io, 2023.
  9. MCMC methods for functions: modifying old algorithms to make them faster. Statistical Science, 28(3):424–446, 2013.
  10. Markov Chains. Springer International Publishing, 1 edition, 2018. ISBN 978-3-319-97703-4. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-97704-1.
  11. Efficient implementation of Markov chain Monte Carlo when using an unbiased likelihood estimator. Biometrika, 102(2):295–313, 2015. ISSN 14643510. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asu075.
  12. Generalization of the Fortuin-Kasteleyn-Swendsen-Wang representation and Monte Carlo algorithm. Physical Review D, 38(6):2009, sep 1988. ISSN 05562821. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.38.2009.
  13. Jørund Gåsemyr. The Spectrum of the Independent Metropolis–Hastings Algorithm. Journal of Theoretical Probability, 19(1):152–165, apr 2006. ISSN 1572-9230. doi: 10.1007/S10959-006-0009-2.
  14. Geometric ergodicity of Metropolis algorithms. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 85(2):341–361, 2000. ISSN 0304-4149. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4149(99)00082-4.
  15. Fritz John. Extremum problems with inequalities as subsidiary conditions. Traces and emergence of nonlinear programming, pages 197–215, 2014.
  16. Random walks on polytopes and an affine interior point method for linear programming. In Proceedings of the forty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 561–570, 2009.
  17. Convergence of Gibbs sampling: Coordinate Hit-and-Run mixes fast. Discrete & Computational Geometry, pages 1–20, 2023.
  18. Convergence of hybrid slice sampling via spectral gap. 2014. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.2709.
  19. Bounds on the l2superscript𝑙2l^{2}italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT spectrum for Markov chains and Markov processes: a generalization of Cheeger’s inequality. Transactions of the American mathematical society, 309(2):557–580, 1988.
  20. Geodesic walks in polytopes. SIAM Journal on Computing, 51(2):STOC17–400, 2022.
  21. Hit-and-run from a corner. Conference Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 310–314, 2004. ISSN 07349025. doi: 10.1145/1007352.1007403.
  22. Rates of convergence of the Hastings and Metropolis algorithms. The Annals of Statistics, 24(1):101–121, 1996.
  23. Efficiency and Convergence Properties of Slice Samplers. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 29(1):1–12, 2002.
  24. Elliptical slice sampling. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2010.
  25. Quantitative spectral gap estimate and Wasserstein contraction of simple slice sampling. Ann. Appl. Probab., 31(2):806–825, 2021. ISSN 1050-5164. doi: 10.1214/20-AAP1605.
  26. Radford M Neal. Slice sampling. The Annals of Statistics, 31(3):705–767, 2003.
  27. Yann Ollivier. Ricci curvature of Markov chains on metric spaces. Journal of Functional Analysis, 256(3):810–864, 2009.
  28. Spectral gap bounds for reversible hybrid Gibbs chains. 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.12782v1.
  29. Monte Carlo statistical methods, volume 2. Springer, 1999.
  30. Geometric ergodicity and hybrid Markov chains. Electronic Communications in Probability, 2:13–25, 1997.
  31. The polar slice sampler. Stochastic Models, 18(2):257–280, 2002. ISSN 15326349. doi: 10.1081/STM-120004467.
  32. Spectral bounds for certain two-factor non-reversible MCMC algorithms. Electron. Commun. Probab, 20(91):1–10, 2015. ISSN 1083589X. doi: 10.1214/ECP.v20-4528.
  33. Dimension-independent spectral gap of polar slice sampling. Stat. Comput., 20(34), 2024.
  34. Robust random walk-like Metropolis-Hastings algorithms for concentrating posteriors. Technical report, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.12127.
  35. Positivity of hit-and-run and related algorithms. Electron. Commun. Probab, 18(49):1–8, 2013. ISSN 1083589X. doi: 10.1214/ECP.v18-2507.
  36. Comparison of hit-and-run, slice sampler and random walk Metropolis. Journal of Applied Probability, 55(4):1186–1202, 2018. ISSN 0021-9002. doi: 10.1017/JPR.2018.78.
  37. Philip Schär. Wasserstein contraction and spectral gap of slice sampling revisited. 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16984v1.
  38. Gibbsian polar slice sampling. 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03945v2.
  39. Robert L. Smith. Efficient Monte Carlo Procedures for Generating Points Uniformly Distributed over Bounded Regions. Operations Research, 32(6):1296–1308, 1984. ISSN 0030364X. doi: 10.1287/OPRE.32.6.1296.
Citations (4)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a framework that uses weak Poincaré inequalities to compare the convergence behavior of ideal and hybrid slice sampling methods.
  • It rigorously derives Dirichlet form formulations and conditions under which hybrid techniques nearly match the efficiency of ideal sampling.
  • The study provides performance bounds and insights that enhance algorithm selection in computational Bayesian inference and classical Metropolis methods.

Weak Poincaré Inequality Comparisons for Ideal and Hybrid Slice Sampling

The paper by Power, Rudolf, Sprungk, and Wang presents a methodological advance in the comparison of Ideal and Hybrid Slice Sampling methods via weak Poincaré inequalities. This framework scrutinizes the convergence properties of these Markov chains through the evaluation of their Dirichlet forms. The primary achievement lies in establishing that Hybrid Slice Sampling retains fast convergence properties from its ideal counterpart, assuming suitable conditions are met.

Key Contributions

  1. Framework Establishment: The paper formalizes a framework to compare the convergence of Markov chains using weak Poincaré inequalities. Through this framework, the authors provide conditions under which the Hybrid Slice Sampling can mirror the convergence properties of the Ideal Slice Sampling.
  2. Algorithm Analysis: By applying the framework, the paper evaluates several algorithms, including Independent Metropolis-Hastings and methods utilizing Slice Sampling with Stepping-Out, Shrinkage, and Hit-and-Run. This is used to gauge the hybrid algorithms' efficiency in converging towards their target distributions compared to their ideal versions.
  3. Mathematical Descriptions: The authors rigorously detail the mathematical formulations underlying the Dirichlet forms and weak Poincaré inequalities that form the backbone of their comparative analysis.

Methodology

  • Dirichlet Form Representation: The study computes Dirichlet forms for both Ideal and Hybrid Slice Samplers and demonstrates how these can provide insights into the variance dissipation rates of the chains.
  • Comparison of Convergence: The utilitarian aspect of weak Poincaré inequalities lies in quantifying how well a less feasible algorithm (Hybrid) mimics its theoretically more efficient counterpart (Ideal). They derive conditions under which one can establish that the hybrid methods, though easier to implement, are 'almost as efficient' in theoretical convergence.
  • Algorithmic Implementation: The paper addresses practical challenges in implementing Ideal Slice Samplers due to the difficulty in sampling from complex distribution slices. Hybrid versions overcome this by using stochastic steps within slices using Markov kernels.

Numerical Results and Implications

  • Performance Bounds: The authors provide explicit bounds on the convergence rates of various Hybrid Slice Sampling algorithms, relative to their Ideal counterparts, through a detailed mathematical treatment of weak Poincaré inequalities.
  • Extensions to Classical Algorithms: Furthermore, the paper recasts classical Metropolis algorithms as instances of Hybrid Slice Sampling, thus providing a new perspective on their convergence properties. This links the efficiency of Hybrid Slice Sampling to well-known algorithms in computational statistics and facilitates comparison using established metrics.
  • Implications for Computational Bayesian Inference: This analysis serves as a critical tool in Bayesian computation, where efficient exploration of state spaces is vital. Given the practical limitations and tuning requirements of classical Metropolis methods, the insights derived here could inform choices in algorithm selection and parameterization.

Future Directions

The proposed framework prompts further investigations into other Markov chains that may benefit from similar analyses using weak Poincaré inequalities. Additionally, it sets a foundation for considering additional modifications to Slice Sampling that could leverage the strengths of hybrid methods while minimizing their drawbacks. Advanced theoretical work could explore loosening assumptions to broaden the applicability of these comparisons or developing automatic tuning methods based on the insights provided.

Overall, this work advances the field by bridging theoretical constructs with practical algorithm implementations, facilitating enhanced sampling methods in computational statistics.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 8 tweets with 166 likes about this paper.