Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Controlling Large Electric Vehicle Charging Stations via User Behavior Modeling and Stochastic Programming

Published 20 Feb 2024 in math.OC, cs.AI, cs.CE, cs.LG, cs.SY, and eess.SY | (2402.13224v4)

Abstract: This paper introduces an Electric Vehicle Charging Station (EVCS) model that incorporates real-world constraints, such as slot power limitations, contract threshold overruns penalties, or early disconnections of electric vehicles (EVs). We propose a formulation of the problem of EVCS control under uncertainty, and implement two Multi-Stage Stochastic Programming approaches that leverage user-provided information, namely, Model Predictive Control and Two-Stage Stochastic Programming. The model addresses uncertainties in charging session start and end times, as well as in energy demand. A user's behavior model based on a sojourn-time-dependent stochastic process enhances cost reduction while maintaining customer satisfaction. The benefits of the two proposed methods are showcased against two baselines over a 22-day simulation using a real-world dataset. The two-stage approach demonstrates robustness against early disconnections by considering a wider range of uncertainty scenarios for optimization. The algorithm prioritizing user satisfaction over electricity cost achieves a 20% and 36% improvement in two user satisfaction metrics compared to an industry-standard baseline. Additionally, the algorithm striking the best balance between cost and user satisfaction exhibits a mere 3% relative cost increase compared to the theoretically optimal baseline - for which the nonanticipativity constraint is relaxed - while attaining 94% and 84% of the user satisfaction performance in the two used satisfaction metrics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (12)
  1. IEA, “Trends in charging infrastructure – global ev outlook 2023 – analysis,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2023/trends-in-charging-infrastructure
  2. J. O. of Energy and Transportation, “State plans for electric vehicle charging,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://driveelectric.gov/state-plans/
  3. EIB, “Europe’s alternative fuels infrastructure getting a boost from new eib and european commission support,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.eib.org/en/press/all/2021-339-europe-s-alternative-fuels-infrastructure-getting-a-boost-from-new-eib-and-european-commission-support
  4. M. Mastoi, S. Zhuang, H. Munir, M. Haris, M. Hassan, M. Usman, S. Bukhari, and J. Ro, “An in-depth analysis of electric vehicle charging station infrastructure, policy implications, and future trends,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 11 504–11 529, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484722017346
  5. T. Rigaut, A. Yousef, M. Andreeva, and V. Ignatova, “Scalable forecasting and model predictive control for electric vehicles smart charging,” in CIRED Porto Workshop 2022: E-mobility and power distribution systems, vol. 2022, Porto, Portugal, 2022, pp. 893–897.
  6. ISO, “Iso 15118-1:2019 road vehicles — vehicle to grid communication interface — part 1: General information and use-case definition,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/69113.html
  7. A. Puech, T. Rigaut, A. Le Franc, W. Templier, J. Alais, M. Tournoud, V. Bossard, A. Yousef, and E. Stolyarova, “Controlling microgrids without external data: A benchmark of stochastic programming methods,” 2023.
  8. L. Campo, P. Mookerjee, and Y. Bar-Shalom, “State estimation for systems with sojourn-time-dependent markov model switching,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 238–243, 1991.
  9. Z. Lee, T. Li, and S. Low, “ACN-Data: Analysis and Applications of an Open EV Charging Dataset,” in Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Future Energy Systems, ser. e-Energy ’19, Jun. 2019.
  10. J. officiel de la république Française, “Arrêté du 30 juillet 2015 relatif aux tarifs réglementés de vente de l’électricité,” Jul 2015. [Online]. Available: "http://www.energies-services.org/upload/ccc29_arrete2015.pdf"
  11. Q. Huangfu and J. J. Hall, “Parallelizing the dual revised simplex method,” Mathematical Programming Computation, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 119–142, 2018.
  12. L. Prokhorenkova, G. Gusev, A. Vorobev, A. Dorogush, and A. Gulin, “Catboost: unbiased boosting with categorical features,” 2019.
Citations (1)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 3 likes about this paper.