Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Non-linear Triple Changes Estimator for Targeted Policies

Published 19 Feb 2024 in stat.ME and econ.EM | (2402.12583v1)

Abstract: The renowned difference-in-differences (DiD) estimator relies on the assumption of 'parallel trends,' which does not hold in many practical applications. To address this issue, the econometrics literature has turned to the triple difference estimator. Both DiD and triple difference are limited to assessing average effects exclusively. An alternative avenue is offered by the changes-in-changes (CiC) estimator, which provides an estimate of the entire counterfactual distribution at the cost of relying on (stronger) distributional assumptions. In this work, we extend the triple difference estimator to accommodate the CiC framework, presenting the `triple changes estimator' and its identification assumptions, thereby expanding the scope of the CiC paradigm. Subsequently, we empirically evaluate the proposed framework and apply it to a study examining the impact of Medicaid expansion on children's preventive care.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effect of training programs, 1984.
  2. Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models. Econometrica, 74(2):431–497, 2006.
  3. Yann Brenier. Polar factorization and monotone rearrangement of vector-valued functions. Communications on pure and applied mathematics, 44(4):375–417, 1991.
  4. Difference-in-differences with a continuous treatment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02637, 2021.
  5. Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast food industry in new jersey and pennsylvania, 1993.
  6. A triple-difference approach to re-evaluating the impact of china’s new cooperative medical scheme on incidences of chronic diseases among older adults in rural communities. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, pages 643–659, 2020.
  7. Flexible sensitivity analysis for observational studies without observable implications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2019.
  8. Combining experimental and observational data for identification and estimation of long-term causal effects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.10743, 2022.
  9. Jonathan Gruber. The incidence of mandated maternity benefits. The American economic review, pages 622–641, 1994.
  10. The effect of a sunday liquor-sales ban repeal on crime: A triple-difference analysis. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 40(5):1111–1121, 2016.
  11. Andrey Kolmogorov. Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge didistribuzione. Giorn Dell’inst Ital Degli Att, 4:89–91, 1933.
  12. The triple difference estimator. The Econometrics Journal, 25(3):531–553, 2022.
  13. Association of state laws permitting denial of services to same-sex couples with mental distress in sexual minority adults: A difference-in-difference-in-differences analysis. JAMA psychiatry, 75(7):671–677, 2018.
  14. Ralph Tyrell Rockafellar. Convex analysis, 1970.
  15. When is parallel trends sensitive to functional form? Econometrica, 91(2):737–747, 2023.
  16. The impact of medicaid expansion for adults under the affordable care act on preventive care for children: evidence from the southern united states. Medical care, 58(11):945–951, 2020.
  17. Donald B Rubin. Randomization analysis of experimental data: The fisher randomization test comment. Journal of the American statistical association, 75(371):591–593, 1980.
  18. Weak monotonicity suffices for truthfulness on convex domains. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pages 286–293, 2005.
  19. Sergio Naruhiko Sakurai and Maria Isabel Accoroni Theodoro. On the relationship between political alignment and government transfers: triple differences evidence from a developing country. Empirical Economics, 58:1107–1141, 2020.
  20. Filippo Santambrogio. Optimal transport for applied mathematicians. Birkäuser, NY, 55(58-63):94, 2015.
  21. John Snow. On the Mode of Communication of Cholera. John Churchill, 1855.
  22. On negative outcome control of unobserved confounding as a generalization of difference-in-differences. Statistical science: a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 31(3):348, 2016.
  23. Racial disparities in service use among medicaid beneficiaries after mandatory enrollment in managed care: a difference-in-differences approach. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 38(1):49–59, 2001.
  24. An optimal transport approach to causal inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.05858, 2021.
  25. Cédric Villani et al. Optimal transport: old and new, volume 338. Springer, 2009.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.