Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
166 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Cooperative Nonlinear Guidance Strategies for Guaranteed Pursuit-Evasion (2402.06176v1)

Published 9 Feb 2024 in eess.SY, cs.MA, cs.RO, cs.SY, math.DS, and math.OC

Abstract: This paper addresses the pursuit-evasion problem involving three agents -- a purser, an evader, and a defender. We develop cooperative guidance laws for the evader-defender team that guarantee that the defender intercepts the pursuer before it reaches the vicinity of the evader. Unlike heuristic methods, optimal control, differential game formulation, and recently proposed time-constrained guidance techniques, we propose a geometric solution to safeguard the evader from the pursuer's incoming threat. The proposed strategy is computationally efficient and expected to be scalable as the number of agents increases. Another alluring feature of the proposed strategy is that the evader-defender team does not require the knowledge of the pursuer's strategy and that the pursuer's interception is guaranteed from arbitrary initial engagement geometries. We further show that the necessary error variables for the evader-defender team vanish within a time that can be exactly prescribed prior to the three-body engagement. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed cooperative defense strategy via simulation in diverse engagement scenarios.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. R. L. Boyell, “Defending a moving target against missile or torpedo attack,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 522–526, 1976.
  2. ——, “Counterweapon aiming for defense of a moving target,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 402–408, 1980.
  3. E. Garcia, D. W. Casbeer, and M. Pachter, “Cooperative strategies for optimal aircraft defense from an attacking missile,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1510–1520, 2015.
  4. T. Shima, “Optimal cooperative pursuit and evasion strategies against a homing missile,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 414–425, 2011.
  5. V. Shaferman and T. Shima, “Cooperative multiple-model adaptive guidance for an aircraft defending missile,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1801–1813, 2010.
  6. O. Prokopov and T. Shima, “Linear quadratic optimal cooperative strategies for active aircraft protection,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 753–764, 2013.
  7. S. Rubinsky and S. Gutman, “Three-player pursuit and evasion conflict,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 98–110, 2014.
  8. T. Yamasaki and S. N. Balakrishnan, “Terminal intercept guidance and autopilot for aircraft defense against an attacking missile via 3d sliding mode approach,” in 2012 American Control Conference (ACC), 2012, pp. 4631–4636.
  9. S. R. Kumar and T. Shima, “Cooperative nonlinear guidance strategies for aircraft defense,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 124–138, 2017.
  10. A. Sinha, S. R. Kumar, and D. Mukherjee, “Cooperative salvo based active aircraft defense using impac time guidance,” IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1573–1578, 2021.
  11. ——, “Three-agent time-constrained cooperative pursuit-evasion,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 104, no. 2, p. 28, 2022.
  12. X. Yan and S. Lyu, “A two-side cooperative interception guidance law for active air defense with a relative time-to-go deviation,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 100, p. 105787, 2020.
  13. T. Yamasaki and S. Balakrishnan, “Triangle intercept guidance for aerial defense,” in AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2010, p. 7876.
  14. S. R. Kumar and D. Mukherjee, “Cooperative active aircraft protection guidance using line-of-sight approach,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 957–967, 2021.
  15. T. Yamasaki, S. N. Balakrishnan, and H. Takano, “Modified command to line-of-sight intercept guidance for aircraft defense,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 898–902, 2013.
  16. S. Ranjan Kumar and D. Mukherjee, “Generalized triangle guidance for safeguarding target using barrier lyapunov function,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 2193–2201, 2022.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.