Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 88 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 81 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 450 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Language-Guided World Models: A Model-Based Approach to AI Control (2402.01695v3)

Published 24 Jan 2024 in cs.CL, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: This paper introduces the concept of Language-Guided World Models (LWMs) -- probabilistic models that can simulate environments by reading texts. Agents equipped with these models provide humans with more extensive and efficient control, allowing them to simultaneously alter agent behaviors in multiple tasks via natural verbal communication. In this work, we take initial steps in developing robust LWMs that can generalize to compositionally novel language descriptions. We design a challenging world modeling benchmark based on the game of MESSENGER (Hanjie et al., 2021), featuring evaluation settings that require varying degrees of compositional generalization. Our experiments reveal the lack of generalizability of the state-of-the-art Transformer model, as it offers marginal improvements in simulation quality over a no-text baseline. We devise a more robust model by fusing the Transformer with the EMMA attention mechanism (Hanjie et al., 2021). Our model substantially outperforms the Transformer and approaches the performance of a model with an oracle semantic parsing and grounding capability. To demonstrate the practicality of this model in improving AI safety and transparency, we simulate a scenario in which the model enables an agent to present plans to a human before execution, and to revise plans based on their language feedback.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (41)
  1. Vision-and-language navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp.  3674–3683, 2018.
  2. Natural language communication with robots. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp.  751–761, 2016.
  3. SRK Branavan. Learning to win by reading manuals in a monte-carlo framework. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 43:661–704, 2012.
  4. Can transformers jump around right in natural language? assessing performance transfer from scan. In BlackboxNLP workshop (EMNLP), 2021.
  5. Deep reinforcement learning in a handful of trials using probabilistic dynamics models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018.
  6. Emergent communication with world models. arXiv e-prints, pp.  arXiv–2002, 2020.
  7. Pilco: A model-based and data-efficient approach to policy search. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on machine learning (ICML-11), pp.  465–472, 2011.
  8. Faith and fate: Limits of transformers on compositionality. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023.
  9. Deep visual foresight for planning robot motion. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp.  2786–2793. IEEE, 2017.
  10. World models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10122, 2018.
  11. Dream to control: Learning behaviors by latent imagination. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01603, 2019.
  12. Mastering atari with discrete world models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02193, 2020.
  13. Mastering diverse domains through world models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04104, 2023.
  14. Grounding language to entities and dynamics for generalization in reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  4051–4062. PMLR, 2021.
  15. Inducing transformer’s compositional generalization ability via auxiliary sequence prediction tasks. In Proceedings of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2021.
  16. Measuring compositional generalization: A comprehensive method on realistic data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  17. Learning to model the world with language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01399, 2023.
  18. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017.
  19. Transformers are sample-efficient world models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
  20. Mapping instructions to actions in 3d environments with visual goal prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.00786, 2018.
  21. Grounding language for transfer in deep reinforcement learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 63:849–874, 2018.
  22. Help, anna! visual navigation with natural multimodal assistance via retrospective curiosity-encouraging imitation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01871, 2019.
  23. Interactive learning from activity description. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  8096–8108. PMLR, 2021.
  24. Learning to query internet text for informing reinforcement learning agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.13079, 2022.
  25. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:27730–27744, 2022.
  26. Langwm: Language grounded world model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17593, 2023.
  27. Transformer-based world models are happy with 100k interactions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=TdBaDGCpjly.
  28. A reduction of imitation learning and structured prediction to no-regret online learning. In Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pp.  627–635. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2011.
  29. Training language models with language feedback at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16755, 2023.
  30. Jürgen Schmidhuber. An on-line algorithm for dynamic reinforcement learning and planning in reactive environments. In 1990 IJCNN international joint conference on neural networks, pp.  253–258. IEEE, 1990a.
  31. Jürgen Schmidhuber. Making the world differentiable: on using self supervised fully recurrent neural networks for dynamic reinforcement learning and planning in non-stationary environments, volume 126. Inst. für Informatik, 1990b.
  32. Jürgen Schmidhuber. A possibility for implementing curiosity and boredom in model-building neural controllers. In Proc. of the international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior: From animals to animats, pp.  222–227, 1991.
  33. Jürgen Schmidhuber. On learning to think: Algorithmic information theory for novel combinations of reinforcement learning controllers and recurrent neural world models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.09249, 2015.
  34. Show or tell? exploring when (and why) teaching with language outperforms demonstration. Cognition, 232:105326, 2023.
  35. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  36. Paul J Werbos. Learning how the world works: Specifications for predictive networks in robots and brains. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, NY, 1987.
  37. Read and reap the rewards: Learning to play atari with the help of instruction manuals. In Workshop on Reincarnating Reinforcement Learning at ICLR 2023, 2023a.
  38. Spring: Studying papers and reasoning to play games. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023b.
  39. Progressively efficient learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13004, 2023.
  40. Rtfm: Generalising to new environment dynamics via reading. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=SJgob6NKvH.
  41. Silg: The multi-environment symbolic interactive language grounding benchmark. In Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2021.
Citations (5)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that language-guided world models substantially improve agent performance, achieving up to a threefold increase.
  • The methodology integrates natural language cues with environment dynamics to reduce the need for costly real-world interactions.
  • A new Messenger benchmark highlights the limitations of Transformer models, motivating a robust, language-informed architectural redesign.

An Overview of Language-Guided World Models for AI Control

The paper introduces an innovative approach to artificial intelligence control, focusing on the integration of language-guided world models (LWMs) into model-based agents. The motivation stems from the challenges faced by traditional world models, which often lack an intuitive communication interface, thus hindering effective human-agent interaction. LWMs are designed to capture environment dynamics by interpreting language descriptions, thereby enhancing the efficiency and adaptability of agent communication through language feedback. This integration facilitates a significant reduction in the need for interactive experiences in real environments, thereby enhancing safety and efficiency.

A standout contribution of the paper is the development of a challenging benchmark built on the game of Messenger. This benchmark requires agents to exhibit compositional generalization to new language inputs and environment dynamics. The experimental results highlight the limitations of state-of-the-art Transformer architectures on the benchmark and motivate the proposal of a more robust architecture that effectively incorporates language information.

The practical implications of LWMs are substantial. By allowing agents to read language cues, these models open up new avenues for enhancing their interpretability and safety. The paper demonstrates the augmented performance of these models through a scenario where agents generate and discuss plans with a human supervisor before execution. Remarkably, the models achieve up to a threefold improvement in agent performance without requiring any additional interactive data from the environment.

Key Findings and Contributions:

  • The strong numerical results underscore that LWMs can significantly enhance the performance of model-based agents. Specifically, LWM-equipped agents reported up to three times better performance compared to those without language guidance, which is a significant technical milestone.
  • The paper claims that LWMs allow easy adaptability through natural language, thereby reducing the costly need for real-world interactions. This feature emphasizes a practical advancement in the control of AI agents, as it implies a potential reduction in the tedious process of manual data collection.
  • A critical evaluation through the Messenger benchmark reveals the bottleneck in existing Transformer-based models concerning compositional generalization, emphasizing the architectural novelty introduced by the authors.

Implications and Future Directions:

From a theoretical standpoint, this research augments the concept of communication and interaction within model-based learning paradigms. By parameterizing aspects of the world model to be receptive to linguistic input, the research sets a stage for a paradigm shift where policy and world model updates are not purely reliant on state-action pairings but can incorporate complex semantic instruction.

In a practical context, this approach can simplify the control structures of AI agents significantly, especially in complex, dynamic environments where pre-programmed policies might be insufficient. The ability to update internal models of an agent through concise human guidance can lead to more adaptable and generalized AI that requires less direct intervention.

Looking forward, the development of LWMs paves the way for further exploration into AI systems that better understand and interact with human narratives. The focus could shift towards refining these models to process high-dimensional and less structured inputs effectively. Future research could explore more complex environments, transferring these concepts beyond controlled grid-world settings to real-world applications, potentially revolutionizing industries reliant on robotic or autonomous systems. This endeavor opens up substantial research potential in rendering AI processes more intuitive and naturally guided while maintaining robust control performance.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 7 posts and received 174 likes.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube