Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 169 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 87 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 185 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 461 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

LINGO-Space: Language-Conditioned Incremental Grounding for Space (2402.01183v1)

Published 2 Feb 2024 in cs.RO, cs.AI, cs.CL, and cs.CV

Abstract: We aim to solve the problem of spatially localizing composite instructions referring to space: space grounding. Compared to current instance grounding, space grounding is challenging due to the ill-posedness of identifying locations referred to by discrete expressions and the compositional ambiguity of referring expressions. Therefore, we propose a novel probabilistic space-grounding methodology (LINGO-Space) that accurately identifies a probabilistic distribution of space being referred to and incrementally updates it, given subsequent referring expressions leveraging configurable polar distributions. Our evaluations show that the estimation using polar distributions enables a robot to ground locations successfully through $20$ table-top manipulation benchmark tests. We also show that updating the distribution helps the grounding method accurately narrow the referring space. We finally demonstrate the robustness of the space grounding with simulated manipulation and real quadruped robot navigation tasks. Code and videos are available at https://lingo-space.github.io.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (44)
  1. Do as i can, not as i say: Grounding language in robotic affordances. In Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 287โ€“318. PMLR.
  2. PyBullet, a Python module for physics simulation for games, robotics and machine learning. http://pybullet.org.
  3. Language to logical form with neural attention. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 33โ€“43.
  4. Google scanned objects: A high-quality dataset of 3D scanned household items. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2553โ€“2560. IEEE.
  5. PaLM-E: An embodied multimodal language model. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). PMLR.
  6. Energy-based models are zero-shot planners for compositional scene rearrangement. In Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS).
  7. Grounding spatial relations for human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 1640โ€“1647. IEEE.
  8. Interactively picking real-world objects with unconstrained spoken language instructions. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 3774โ€“3781. IEEE.
  9. Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2961โ€“2969.
  10. An intelligence architecture for grounded language communication with field robots. Field Robotics, 468โ€“512.
  11. A natural language planner interface for mobile manipulators. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 6652โ€“6659. IEEE.
  12. Strategies for pre-training graph neural networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representation (ICLR).
  13. Inner monologue: Embodied reasoning through planning with language models. In Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 1769โ€“1782. PMLR.
  14. Bottom up top down detection transformers for language grounding in images and point clouds. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 417โ€“433. Springer.
  15. Ground then navigate: Language-guided navigation in dynamic scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 4113โ€“4120. IEEE.
  16. Representing spatial object relations as parametric polar distribution for scene manipulation based on verbal commands. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 8373โ€“8380. IEEE.
  17. SGGNet22{}^{2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT: Speech-scene graph grounding network for speech-guided navigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 1648โ€“1654. IEEE.
  18. Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 9493โ€“9500. IEEE.
  19. Lang2LTL: Translating natural language commands to temporal robot task specification. In The Workshop on Language and Robotics at Conference on robot learning.
  20. Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.05499.
  21. A joint model of language and perception for grounded attribute learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 1435โ€“1442.
  22. Grounding language with visual affordances over unstructured data. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 11576โ€“11582. IEEE.
  23. Learning object placements for relational instructions by hallucinating scene representations. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 94โ€“100. IEEE.
  24. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. Communications of the ACM, 65(1): 99โ€“106.
  25. Learning neuro-symbolic programs for language guided robot manipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 7973โ€“7980. IEEE.
  26. OpenAI. 2023. ChatGPT (Aug 14 version). https://chat.openai.com/chat. Large language model.
  27. Efficient grounding of abstract spatial concepts for natural language interaction with robot platforms. International Journal of Robotics Research, 37(10): 1269โ€“1299.
  28. Predicting stable configurations for semantic placement of novel objects. In Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 806โ€“815. PMLR.
  29. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 8748โ€“8763. PMLR.
  30. Recipe for a general, powerful, scalable graph transformer. Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 35: 14501โ€“14515.
  31. Leveraging language for accelerated learning of tool manipulation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 1531โ€“1541. PMLR.
  32. Leveraging past references for robust language grounding. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 430โ€“440.
  33. LM-Nav: Robotic navigation with large pre-trained models of language, vision, and action. In Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 492โ€“504. PMLR.
  34. Cliport: What and where pathways for robotic manipulation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 894โ€“906. PMLR.
  35. INGRESS: Interactive visual grounding of referring expressions. International Journal of Robotics Research, 39(2-3): 217โ€“232.
  36. Progprompt: Generating situated robot task plans using large language models. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 11523โ€“11530. IEEE.
  37. Llm-planner: Few-shot grounded planning for embodied agents with large language models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2998โ€“3009.
  38. Utilizing spatial relations for natural language access to an autonomous mobile robot. In Proceedings of the German Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 39โ€“50. Springer.
  39. Grounding spatial relations in natural language by fuzzy representation for human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 1743โ€“1750. IEEE.
  40. Understanding natural language commands for robotic navigation and mobile manipulation. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), volumeย 25, 1507โ€“1514. AAAI Press.
  41. Attention is all you need. Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 30.
  42. Spatial reasoning from natural language instructions for robot manipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 11196โ€“11202. IEEE.
  43. Transporter networks: Rearranging the visual world for robotic manipulation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 726โ€“747. PMLR.
  44. Differentiable parsing and visual grounding of natural language instructions for object placement. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 11546โ€“11553. IEEE.
Citations (4)

Summary

  • The paper introduces LINGO-Space, a method that incrementally grounds complex spatial language using probabilistic reasoning.
  • It combines a scene-graph generator, semantic parser, and spatial-distribution estimator to address the ambiguity in composite instructions.
  • Experimental results show that LINGO-Space outperforms existing methods in tasks like table-top manipulation, enhancing robotic navigation and interaction.

An Examination of LINGO-Space: Language-Conditioned Incremental Grounding for Space

The paper "LINGO-Space: Language-Conditioned Incremental Grounding for Space" addresses the complex problem of space grounding in robotics. This domain extends the grounding problem by focusing on spatially localizing composite instructions, encompassing spatial relations within a given instruction. The central premise of the work is the need for robotics to not only identify objects but also understand instructions related to space, critical for tasks like manipulation or navigation where spatial cues dictate object placement or location identification.

Probabilistic Space-Grounding Methodology

The authors propose LINGO-Space, a methodology that leverages probabilistic reasoning to localize spaces referred to in composite natural language instructions. This approach departs from conventional instance grounding techniques focusing solely on objects and instead tackles the inherent ambiguity of spatial references. The LINGO-Space framework operates by updating a probabilistic distribution of space incrementally, processing referring expressions sequentially, a task which is non-trivial due to the compositional nature and ambiguity of spatial language.

Key to this method is the use of configurable polar distributions, which allow for the representation of uncertainty in spatial terms. By leveraging LLM-guided semantic parsers, the proposed method enhances its ability to interpret complex referring expressions accurately. Through evaluations, it is demonstrated that this approach effectively grounds space through tasks like table-top manipulation, showcasing robustness across simulations and real robotic scenarios.

Methodology Overview and Technical Components

The architecture of LINGO-Space comprises three main components: a scene-graph generator, a semantic parser, and a spatial-distribution estimator.

  1. Scene-Graph Generator: This module creates a representation of the physical scene, capturing objects and their spatial relationships. Each object's position, bounding box, and visual features are encoded and linked with their spatial relations to other objects, forming a comprehensive graph.
  2. Semantic Parser: This component employs a LLM to decompose natural language instructions into a structured format, identifying actions and spatial relations sequentially, rather than concurrently. This decomposition allows the system to handle composite instructions, parsing them into simpler, manageable units for further processing.
  3. Spatial-Distribution Estimator: At the heart of the LINGO-Space, this component models the spatial probability distribution using a mixture of polar distributions, which are updated incrementally. This process allows the estimator to refine location estimates iteratively, accommodating new information from parsed instructions.

Experimental Validation and Performance

The experimental results presented in the paper indicate that LINGO-Space outperforms existing baseline methods in space grounding tasks, especially when dealing with composite instructions featuring multiple spatial relations. The paper utilizes several benchmark tests, including newly introduced ones, to evaluate the accuracy of space grounding when new predicates are involved. The system's ability to produce high success scores across diverse scenarios underscores its robustness and adaptability.

The paper also discusses real-world applications of LINGO-Space, particularly in robotic navigation and manipulation tasks. The practical applicability of the method is demonstrated through the integration of LINGO-Space into robotic frameworks, where it effectively guides a quadruped robot by interpreting and acting upon complex spatial instructions.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

From a theoretical standpoint, LINGO-Space advances the understanding of spatial grounding by introducing a probabilistic framework that is capable of handling the nuanced complexity of natural language instructions. Practically, the integration of LINGO-Space into robotic systems paves the way for more advanced human-robot interaction capabilities, where robots can intuitively understand and execute tasks in compliance with spatial descriptions given by humans.

Future Developments

The research opens several avenues for future exploration, particularly in enhancing the accuracy and versatility of probabilistic distributions used for spatial reasoning. Further refinements could focus on improving the semantic parsing of instructions to handle even more complex linguistic structures, potentially leveraging advances in LLMs. Additionally, integrating LINGO-Space with more sophisticated sensor technologies could enhance its robustness in diverse environments.

In conclusion, LINGO-Space presents a significant contribution to the field of robotics, specifically in the nuanced area of spatial instruction grounding. With further development, this approach holds promise for expanding the capabilities of robots in complex operational environments where understanding space and spatial relations plays a critical role.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 1 like.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper:

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube