Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A Unified KKL-based Interval Observer for Nonlinear Discrete-time Systems

Published 25 Jan 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY | (2401.14505v3)

Abstract: This work proposes an interval observer design for nonlinear discrete-time systems based on the Kazantzis-Kravaris/Luenberger (KKL) paradigm. Our design extends to generic nonlinear systems without any assumption on the structure of its dynamics and output maps. Relying on a transformation putting the system into a target form where an interval observer can be directly designed, we then propose a method to reconstruct the bounds in the original coordinates using the bounds in the target coordinates, thanks to the Lipschitz injectivity of this transformation achieved under Lipschitz distinguishability when the target dynamics have a high enough dimension and are pushed sufficiently fast. An academic example serves to illustrate our methods.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. J.-L. Gouzé, A. Rapaport, and M. Z. Hadj-Sadok, “Interval observers for uncertain biological systems,” Ecological modelling, vol. 133, no. 1-2, pp. 45–56, 2000.
  2. D. Efimov and T. Raïssi, “Design of interval observers for uncertain dynamical systems,” Automation and Remote Control, vol. 77, pp. 191–225, 2016.
  3. L. Meyer, D. Ichalal, and V. Vigneron, “Interval observer for nonlinear Lipschitz systems with unknown inputs,” in 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC), 2018, pp. 5962–5967.
  4. T. N. Dinh, B.-M. Nguyen, F. Zhu, and T. Raïssi, “Functional interval observer for discrete-time nonlinear Lipschitz systems,” in IFAC World Congress, Yokohama, Japan, Jul. 2023, pp. 8476–8481.
  5. M. Khajenejad, Z. Jin, T. N. Dinh, and S. Z. Yong, “Resilient state estimation for nonlinear discrete-time systems via input and state interval observer synthesis,” in 62nd IEEE Conf. Decis. Control (CDC), Dec. 2023, pp. 1826–1832.
  6. M. Khajenejad and S. Z. Yong, “Simultaneous input and state interval observers for nonlinear systems with full-rank direct feedthrough,” in 59th IEEE Conf. Decis. Control, 2020, pp. 5443–5448.
  7. D. Efimov, T. Raïssi, S. Chebotarev, and A. Zolghadri, “Interval state observer for nonlinear time varying systems,” Automatica, vol. 49, pp. 200–205, 2013.
  8. T. N. Dinh, F. Mazenc, and S.-I. Niculescu, “Interval observer composed of observers for nonlinear systems,” in 13th European Control Conference, Strasbourg, France, Dec. 2014, pp. 660–665.
  9. V. Andrieu and L. Praly, “On the existence of a Kazantzis–Kravaris/Luenberger observer,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 432–456, 2006.
  10. C. Afri, V. Andrieu, L. Bako, and P. Dufour, “State and parameter estimation: A nonlinear Luenberger observer approach,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 973–980, 2017.
  11. L. Brivadis, V. Andrieu, P. Bernard, and U. Serres, “Further remarks on KKL observers,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 172, p. 105429, 2023.
  12. L. Brivadis, V. Andrieu, and U. Serres, “Luenberger observers for discrete-time nonlinear systems,” in 58th IEEE Conf. Decis. Control, 2019, pp. 3435–3440.
  13. G. Q. B. Tran and P. Bernard, “Arbitrarily fast robust KKL observer for nonlinear time-varying discrete systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1520–1535, 2024.
  14. M. Buisson-Fenet, L. Bahr, V. Morgenthaler, and F. D. Meglio, “Towards gain tuning for numerical KKL observers,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 4061–4067, 2023, 22nd IFAC World Congress.
  15. A. Hugo, L. Meyer, H. Piet-Lahanier, R. E. H. Thabet, and S. Ahmed Ali, “Interval KKL observer for uncertain discrete time-varying nonlinear systems,” Preprint (version 1), April 2024. [Online]. Available: https://hal.science/hal-04529711
  16. D. Efimov, W. Perruquetti, T. Raïssi, and A. Zolghadri, “Interval observers for time-varying discrete-time systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 3218–3224, 2013.
  17. F. Mazenc, T. N. Dinh, and S.-I. Niculescu, “Interval observers for discrete-time systems,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 24, no. 17, pp. 2867–2890, 2014.
  18. E. J. McShane, “Extension of range of functions,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 837 – 842, 1934.
  19. L. Yang, O. Mickelin, and N. Ozay, “On sufficient conditions for mixed monotonicity,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 5080–5085, 2019.
  20. P. Bernard and V. Andrieu, “Luenberger observers for nonautonomous nonlinear systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 270–281, 2019.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.