Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

TraKDis: A Transformer-based Knowledge Distillation Approach for Visual Reinforcement Learning with Application to Cloth Manipulation

Published 24 Jan 2024 in cs.RO | (2401.13362v1)

Abstract: Approaching robotic cloth manipulation using reinforcement learning based on visual feedback is appealing as robot perception and control can be learned simultaneously. However, major challenges result due to the intricate dynamics of cloth and the high dimensionality of the corresponding states, what shadows the practicality of the idea. To tackle these issues, we propose TraKDis, a novel Transformer-based Knowledge Distillation approach that decomposes the visual reinforcement learning problem into two distinct stages. In the first stage, a privileged agent is trained, which possesses complete knowledge of the cloth state information. This privileged agent acts as a teacher, providing valuable guidance and training signals for subsequent stages. The second stage involves a knowledge distillation procedure, where the knowledge acquired by the privileged agent is transferred to a vision-based agent by leveraging pre-trained state estimation and weight initialization. TraKDis demonstrates better performance when compared to state-of-the-art RL techniques, showing a higher performance of 21.9%, 13.8%, and 8.3% in cloth folding tasks in simulation. Furthermore, to validate robustness, we evaluate the agent in a noisy environment; the results indicate its ability to handle and adapt to environmental uncertainties effectively. Real robot experiments are also conducted to showcase the efficiency of our method in real-world scenarios.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. J. Borràs, “Effective grasping enables successful robot-assisted dressing,” Science Robotics, vol. 7, no. 65, p. eabo7229, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/scirobotics.abo7229
  2. J. Matas, S. James, and A. J. Davison, “Sim-to-real reinforcement learning for deformable object manipulation,” in Conference on Robot Learning.   PMLR, 2018, pp. 734–743.
  3. X. Lin, Y. Wang, J. Olkin, and D. Held, “Softgym: Benchmarking deep reinforcement learning for deformable object manipulation,” in Conference on Robot Learning.   PMLR, 2021, pp. 432–448.
  4. R. Jangir, G. Alenyà, and C. Torras, “Dynamic cloth manipulation with deep reinforcement learning,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2020, pp. 4630–4636.
  5. Y. Wu, W. Yan, T. Kurutach, L. Pinto, and P. Abbeel, “Learning to manipulate deformable objects without demonstrations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13439, 2019.
  6. G. Salhotra, I.-C. A. Liu, M. Dominguez-Kuhne, and G. S. Sukhatme, “Learning deformable object manipulation from expert demonstrations,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 8775–8782, 2022.
  7. S. Levine, C. Finn, T. Darrell, and P. Abbeel, “End-to-end training of deep visuomotor policies,” The Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1334–1373, 2016.
  8. S. Levine, P. Pastor, A. Krizhevsky, J. Ibarz, and D. Quillen, “Learning hand-eye coordination for robotic grasping with deep learning and large-scale data collection,” The International journal of robotics research, vol. 37, no. 4-5, pp. 421–436, 2018.
  9. L. Pinto, M. Andrychowicz, P. Welinder, W. Zaremba, and P. Abbeel, “Asymmetric actor critic for image-based robot learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.06542, 2017.
  10. I.-C. A. Liu, S. Uppal, G. S. Sukhatme, J. J. Lim, P. Englert, and Y. Lee, “Distilling motion planner augmented policies into visual control policies for robot manipulation,” in Conference on Robot Learning.   PMLR, 2022, pp. 641–650.
  11. W. Ding, N. Majcherczyk, M. Deshpande, X. Qi, D. Zhao, R. Madhivanan, and A. Sen, “Learning to view: Decision transformers for active object detection,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2023, pp. 7140–7146.
  12. S. K. Ramakrishnan, D. Jayaraman, and K. Grauman, “An exploration of embodied visual exploration,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 129, pp. 1616–1649, 2021.
  13. W. Ding, N. Majcherczyk, M. Deshpande, X. Qi, D. Zhao, R. Madhivanan, and A. Sen, “Learning to view: Decision transformers for active object detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.09544, 2023.
  14. S. Humeau, K. Shuster, M.-A. Lachaux, and J. Weston, “Poly-encoders: Transformer architectures and pre-training strategies for fast and accurate multi-sentence scoring,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.01969, 2019.
  15. Z. Zhu, K. Lin, A. K. Jain, and J. Zhou, “Transfer learning in deep reinforcement learning: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2023.
  16. J. Borràs, G. Alenyà, and C. Torras, “A grasping-centered analysis for cloth manipulation,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 924–936, 2020.
  17. I. Garcia-Camacho, M. Lippi, M. C. Welle, H. Yin, R. Antonova, A. Varava, J. Borras, C. Torras, A. Marino, G. Alenyà, and D. Kragic, “Benchmarking bimanual cloth manipulation,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1111–1118, 2020.
  18. D. Seita, N. Jamali, M. Laskey, A. K. Tanwani, R. Berenstein, P. Baskaran, S. Iba, J. Canny, and K. Goldberg, “Deep Transfer Learning of Pick Points on Fabric for Robot Bed-Making,” in International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR), 2019.
  19. J. Qian, T. Weng, L. Zhang, B. Okorn, and D. Held, “Cloth region segmentation for robust grasp selection,” in 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).   IEEE, 2020, pp. 9553–9560.
  20. H. Ha and S. Song, “Flingbot: The unreasonable effectiveness of dynamic manipulation for cloth unfolding,” in Conference on Robotic Learning (CoRL), 2021.
  21. Z. Xu, C. Chi, B. Burchfiel, E. Cousineau, S. Feng, and S. Song, “Dextairity: Deformable manipulation can be a breeze,” in Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2022.
  22. W. Chen, D. Lee, D. Chappell, and N. Rojas, “Learning to grasp clothing structural regions for garment manipulation tasks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14553, 2023.
  23. Y. Wang, Z. Sun, Z. Erickson, and D. Held, “One policy to dress them all: Learning to dress people with diverse poses and garments,” in Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2023.
  24. M. Laskin, A. Srinivas, and P. Abbeel, “Curl: Contrastive unsupervised representations for reinforcement learning,” in International Conference on Machine Learning.   PMLR, 2020, pp. 5639–5650.
  25. D. Hafner, T. Lillicrap, I. Fischer, R. Villegas, D. Ha, H. Lee, and J. Davidson, “Learning latent dynamics for planning from pixels,” in International conference on machine learning.   PMLR, 2019, pp. 2555–2565.
  26. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
  27. A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly, et al., “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  28. L. Chen, K. Lu, A. Rajeswaran, K. Lee, A. Grover, M. Laskin, P. Abbeel, A. Srinivas, and I. Mordatch, “Decision transformer: Reinforcement learning via sequence modeling,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 34, pp. 15 084–15 097, 2021.
  29. Q. Zheng, A. Zhang, and A. Grover, “Online decision transformer,” in International Conference on Machine Learning.   PMLR, 2022, pp. 27 042–27 059.
  30. K.-H. Lee, O. Nachum, M. S. Yang, L. Lee, D. Freeman, S. Guadarrama, I. Fischer, W. Xu, E. Jang, H. Michalewski, et al., “Multi-game decision transformers,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 27 921–27 936, 2022.
  31. G. Hinton, O. Vinyals, and J. Dean, “Distilling the knowledge in a neural network,” stat, vol. 1050, p. 9, 2015.
  32. A. Kumar, Z. Fu, D. Pathak, and J. Malik, “Rma: Rapid motor adaptation for legged robots,” 2021.
  33. J. Lee, J. Hwangbo, L. Wellhausen, V. Koltun, and M. Hutter, “Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain,” Science robotics, vol. 5, no. 47, p. eabc5986, 2020.
  34. M. Janner, Q. Li, and S. Levine, “Offline reinforcement learning as one big sequence modeling problem,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 34, pp. 1273–1286, 2021.
  35. M. Laskin, K. Lee, A. Stooke, L. Pinto, P. Abbeel, and A. Srinivas, “Reinforcement learning with augmented data,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 19 884–19 895, 2020.
  36. J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018.
  37. Y. You, J. Li, S. Reddi, J. Hseu, S. Kumar, S. Bhojanapalli, X. Song, J. Demmel, K. Keutzer, and C.-J. Hsieh, “Large batch optimization for deep learning: Training bert in 76 minutes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.00962, 2019.
  38. R. M. Shah and V. Kumar, “Rrl: Resnet as representation for reinforcement learning,” in International Conference on Machine Learning.   PMLR, 2021, pp. 9465–9476.
  39. C. Wang, X. Luo, K. Ross, and D. Li, “Vrl3: A data-driven framework for visual deep reinforcement learning,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 32 974–32 988, 2022.
Citations (6)

Summary

  • The paper introduces TraKDis, a two-stage framework that distills knowledge from a privileged agent to a vision-based agent using transformers.
  • It employs CNN encoders and weight initialization to bridge the gap between complete state representations and visual inputs for improved learning.
  • Empirical tests show up to 21.9% performance gains in cloth manipulation tasks, demonstrating the method's robustness under noisy conditions.

Transformer-based Knowledge Distillation for Visual Reinforcement Learning in Cloth Manipulation

The paper "TraKDis: A Transformer-based Knowledge Distillation Approach for Visual Reinforcement Learning with Application to Cloth Manipulation," authored by Wei Chen and Nicolas Rojas, presents an innovative framework aimed at improving visual reinforcement learning (RL) agents involved in robotic cloth manipulation tasks. The central focus of this work is the development of a method termed TraKDis, which utilizes transformers for knowledge distillation, enhancing the learning capacity of vision-based RL agents operating under the constraints of high-dimensional and partially observable environments.

Overview of the Methodology

The research tackles the significant challenges posed by visual cloth manipulation, characterized by complex dynamics and high elasticity of cloth materials. The predominant issue addressed is the difficulty of training RL agents that can perform effectively based solely on visual data. To alleviate this, Chen and Rojas propose a two-stage framework.

  1. Privileged Agent Learning: The first stage involves training a privileged agent using a complete state representation of the cloth, which includes intrinsic details such as particle locations. This privileged agent functions as an expert, generating high-performance RL policies derived from comprehensive cloth state information.
  2. Knowledge Distillation to Visual Agent: In the second stage, the knowledge from the privileged agent is distilled into a vision-based student agent. This is achieved through a combination of pre-trained CNN encoders for state estimation and weight initialization, promoting effective learning from RGB images. The CNN encoders are tasked with reducing the dimensionality gap between visual inputs and state representations. The process is aided by initializing the student's network weights with those of the privileged model, enhancing both convergence speed and policy performance.

TraKDis is distinctly reliant on the capabilities of transformer architectures, which provide the advantage of handling sequence models and maintaining historical context, a necessity for accurately predicting the outcomes of actions over time, especially in the case of dynamic cloth manipulation tasks.

Numerical Performance and Robustness

Empirical results demonstrate that TraKDis significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art RL frameworks in various cloth manipulation tasks, such as folding. Specifically, the approach exhibits performance improvements of 21.9%, 13.8%, and 8.3% across different simulated environments, showcasing the robustness of the method in handling the unpredictable nuances of cloth dynamics. Notably, the model's robustness is further validated by its ability to adapt to noisy conditions that might lead to estimation inaccuracies, proving superior to existing methods.

Implications and Future Scope

The implications of this research are substantial for fields requiring dexterous manipulation of deformable objects, such as automated textile manufacturing and ergonomic robotic aids in healthcare settings. The use of transformers for RL contexts introduces scalable potential for handling broader arrays of data inputs and sequencing, while the knowledge distillation process streamlines the deployment of visual-based autonomous tasks without extensive reliance on complete state information.

While the present work addresses foundational challenges in visual RL for complex environments, future research could explore optimizing data efficiency further, particularly in the context of offline policy learning, which currently demands extensive datasets. Additionally, advances could be made to reduce the computational overhead associated with transformer models, making them more feasible for real-time applications in constrained hardware environments.

In summary, the paper contributes a well-structured framework that leverages cutting-edge AI mechanisms to bridge the gap between state-based learning and visual observation, thus advancing the competencies of robotic systems in challenging manipulation tasks.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.