Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 172 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 210 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 433 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Unambiguous Efficiency of Random Allocations (2401.11899v3)

Published 22 Jan 2024 in econ.TH

Abstract: In the problem of allocating indivisible objects via lottery, a social planner often knows only agents' ordinal preferences over objects, but not their complete preferences over lotteries. Such an informationally constrained planner cannot distinguish between different utility profiles that induce the same rankings over the objects. In this context, we ask what it means to adjudge an allocation as efficient. We introduce the concept of unambiguous efficiency, which guarantees no further Pareto improvement regardless of how agents' ordinal preferences extend to lotteries. We compare this concept with the predominant formulation of efficiency in the random allocation literature and explore some structural properties. As an application to mechanism design, we characterize the class of efficient and strategy-proof ordinal mechanisms that satisfy certain regularity conditions.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 2 tweets and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: