Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Machine Learning Applications in Gravitational Wave Astronomy (2401.07406v1)

Published 15 Jan 2024 in gr-qc and astro-ph.HE

Abstract: Gravitational wave astronomy has emerged as a new branch of observational astronomy, since the first detection of gravitational waves in 2015. The current number of $O(100)$ detections is expected to grow by several orders of magnitude over the next two decades. As a result, current computationally expensive detection algorithms will become impractical. A solution to this problem, which has been explored in the last years, is the application of machine-learning techniques to accelerate the detection and parameter estimation of gravitational wave sources. In this chapter, several different applications are summarized, including the application of artificial neural networks and autoenconders in accelerating the computation of surrogate models, deep residual networks in achieving rapid detections with high sensitivity, as well as artificial neural networks for accelerating the construction of neutron star models in an alternative theory of gravity.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (134)
  1. B.P. Abbott et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(6):061102, 2016.
  2. R. Abbott et al. GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2111.03606, November 2021.
  3. J. Aasi et al. Advanced LIGO. Class. Quant. Grav., 32:074001, 2015.
  4. F Acernese et al. Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(2):024001, 2014.
  5. T Akutsu et al. KAGRA: 2.5 Generation Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detector. Nature Astronomy, 3(1):35–40, Jan 2019.
  6. T Akutsu et al. Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2021(5), 08 2020. 05A101.
  7. B. P. Abbott et al. Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA. Living Reviews in Relativity, 23(1):3, Sep 2020.
  8. M. Saleem et al. The science case for LIGO-India. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 39(2):025004, January 2022.
  9. M. Punturo et al. The Einstein Telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory. Class. Quantum Gravity, 27(19):194002, 2010.
  10. Michele Maggiore et al. Science case for the Einstein telescope. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2020(3):050, March 2020.
  11. David Reitze et al. Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. contribution to gravitational-wave astronomy beyond LIGO. In Bull. Am. Astron. Soc., volume 51, page 35, 2019.
  12. Matthew Evans et al. A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2109.09882, September 2021.
  13. B. P. Abbott et al. Exploring the sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detectors. Class. Quantum Gravity, 34(4):044001, 2017.
  14. Expanding the Reach of Gravitational Wave Astronomy to the Edge of the Universe: The Gravitational-Wave International Committee Study Reports on Next Generation Ground-based Gravitational-Wave Observatories. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2111.06986, November 2021.
  15. The Next Generation Global Gravitational Wave Observatory: The Science Book. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2111.06990, November 2021.
  16. Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 103:104056, May 2021.
  17. SEOBNRv5PHM: Next generation of accurate and efficient multipolar precessing-spin effective-one-body waveforms for binary black holes. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2303.18046, March 2023.
  18. A nicer view of PSR j0030+0451: Millisecond pulsar parameter estimation. The Astrophysical Journal, 887(1):L21, dec 2019.
  19. Psr j0030+0451 mass and radius from nicer data and implications for the properties of neutron star matter. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 887(1):L24, dec 2019.
  20. The radius of psr j0740+6620 from nicer and xmm-newton data. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 918(2):L28, sep 2021.
  21. Eric D. Van Oeveren and John L. Friedman. Upper limit set by causality on the tidal deformability of a neutron star. Physical Review D, 95(8), apr 2017.
  22. Tanja Hinderer. Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars. Astrophys. J., 677:1216–1220, 2008.
  23. Katerina Chatziioannou. Neutron-star tidal deformability and equation-of-state constraints. General Relativity and Gravitation, 52(11):109, 2020.
  24. Interpreting binary neutron star mergers: describing the binary neutron star dynamics, modelling gravitational waveforms, and analyzing detections. General Relativity and Gravitation, 53(3):27, 2021.
  25. Bhaskar Biswas. Bayesian model selection of neutron star equations of state using multi-messenger observations. The Astrophysical Journal, 926(1):75, feb 2022.
  26. Multimessenger constraints on the neutron-star equation of state and the hubble constant. Science, 370(6523):1450–1453, 2020.
  27. Nonparametric constraints on neutron star matter with existing and upcoming gravitational wave and pulsar observations. Phys. Rev. D, 101(12):123007, June 2020.
  28. Constraints on the Dense Matter Equation of State and Neutron Star Properties from NICER’s Mass–Radius Estimate of PSR J0740+6620 and Multimessenger Observations. Astrophys. J. Lett., 918(2):L29, 2021.
  29. B. P. Abbott et al. GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119(16):161101, 2017.
  30. B. P. Abbott et al. Properties of the binary neutron star merger GW170817. Phys. Rev. X, 9(1):011001, 2019.
  31. Enhancing gravitational-wave science with machine learning. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 2(1):011002, dec 2020.
  32. Ai in gravitational wave analysis, an overview. Applied Sciences, 13(17), 2023.
  33. Dawning of a New Era in Gravitational Wave Data Analysis: Unveiling Cosmic Mysteries via Artificial Intelligence – A Systematic Review. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2311.15585, November 2023.
  34. Deep residual error and bag-of-tricks learning for gravitational wave surrogate modeling. Applied Soft Computing, 147:110746, 2023.
  35. Autoencoder-driven Spiral Representation Learning for Gravitational Wave Surrogate Modelling. Neurocomputing, 491:67–77, June 2022.
  36. Deep residual networks for gravitational wave detection. Phys. Rev. D, 108(2):024022, July 2023.
  37. A neural-network-based surrogate model for the properties of neutron stars in 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2309.03991, September 2023.
  38. Fast prediction and evaluation of gravitational waveforms using surrogate models. Physical Review X, 4(3):031006, 2014.
  39. Reduced Order and Surrogate Models for Gravitational Waves. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2101.11608, January 2021.
  40. Michael Pürrer. Frequency domain reduced order model of aligned-spin effective-one-body waveforms with generic mass ratios and spins. Phys. Rev. D, 93(6):064041, March 2016.
  41. Effective-one-body waveforms for binary neutron stars using surrogate models. Phys. Rev. D, 95(10):104036, May 2017.
  42. Surrogate model for an aligned-spin effective-one-body waveform model of binary neutron star inspirals using Gaussian process regression. Phys. Rev. D, 100(2):024002, July 2019.
  43. Surrogate model for gravitational waveforms of spin-aligned binary black holes with eccentricities. Phys. Rev. D, 103(12):124053, June 2021.
  44. Gravitational-wave surrogate models powered by artificial neural networks. Phys. Rev. D, 103(6):064015, 2021.
  45. Michele Maggiore. Gravitational Waves Volume 1: Theory and Experiments. Oxford University Press, 2008.
  46. Improved effective-one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with advanced detectors. Phys. Rev. D, 95(4):044028, February 2017.
  47. Chad R. Galley. RomPy package, 2020. https://bitbucket.org/chadgalley/rompy/.
  48. Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform? Phys. Rev. D, 49(6):2658–2697, Mar 1994.
  49. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, 2017.
  50. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In ICML, pages 807–814, 2010.
  51. Improving deep neural networks using softplus units. 2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pages 1–4, 2015.
  52. scikit learn. 6.3. preprocessing data. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/preprocessing.html.
  53. Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning, pages 1096–1103, 2008.
  54. Unsupervised deep embedding for clustering analysis. In International conference on machine learning, pages 478–487, 2016.
  55. Self-supervised autoencoders for clustering and classification. Evolving Systems, pages 1–14, 2018.
  56. Deep learning algorithms for discriminant autoencoding. Neurocomputing, 266:325–335, 2017.
  57. Discriminatively trained autoencoders for fast and accurate face recognition. In International Conference on Engineering Applications of Neural Networks, pages 205–215. Springer, 2017.
  58. Online multimodal deep similarity learning with application to image retrieval. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 153–162, 2013.
  59. Hashing with binary autoencoders. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 557–566, 2015.
  60. Inspiral-merger-ringdown multipolar waveforms of nonspinning black-hole binaries using the effective-one-body formalism. Phys. Rev. D, 84(12):124052, December 2011.
  61. Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 1026–1034, 2015.
  62. Automatic differentiation in pytorch. In NIPS-W, 2017.
  63. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  64. Mimicking mergers: mistaking black hole captures as mergers. MNRAS, 516(3):3847–3860, November 2022.
  65. Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO. In Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, volume 51, page 35, September 2019.
  66. Science case for the Einstein telescope. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2020(3):050, March 2020.
  67. Gravitational Wave Data Analysis: Computing Challenges in the 3G Era. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2111.06987, November 2021.
  68. Matching matched filtering with deep networks for gravitational-wave astronomy. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120:141103, Apr 2018.
  69. Deep neural networks to enable real-time multimessenger astrophysics. Phys. Rev. D, 97:044039, Feb 2018.
  70. Convolutional neural networks: A magic bullet for gravitational-wave detection? Phys. Rev. D, 100(6):063015, September 2019.
  71. Scalable auto-encoders for gravitational waves detection from time series data. Expert Systems with Applications, 151:113378, 2020.
  72. Detection of gravitational-wave signals from binary neutron star mergers using machine learning. Phys. Rev. D, 102:063015, Sep 2020.
  73. Gravitational-wave signal recognition of LIGO data by deep learning. Phys. Rev. D, 101(10):104003, May 2020.
  74. Plamen G. Krastev. Real-time detection of gravitational waves from binary neutron stars using artificial neural networks. Physics Letters B, 803:135330, April 2020.
  75. Real-Time Detection of Unmodelled Gravitational-Wave Transients Using Convolutional Neural Networks. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2009.14611, September 2020.
  76. Detection of gravitational waves using Bayesian neural networks. Phys. Rev. D, 103(6):063034, March 2021.
  77. Accelerated, scalable and reproducible AI-driven gravitational wave detection. Nature Astronomy, 5:1062–1068, July 2021.
  78. A semisupervised machine learning search for never-seen gravitational-wave sources. Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., 500(4):5408–5419, February 2021.
  79. Deep learning ensemble for real-time gravitational wave detection of spinning binary black hole mergers. Physics Letters B, 812:136029, January 2021.
  80. Improving significance of binary black hole mergers in Advanced LIGO data using deep learning: Confirmation of GW151216. Phys. Rev. D, 104(6):064051, September 2021.
  81. Inference-optimized ai and high performance computing for gravitational wave detection at scale. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 2022.
  82. SiGMa-Net: Deep learning network to distinguish binary black hole signals from short-duration noise transients. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2202.08671, February 2022.
  83. From one to many: A deep learning coincident gravitational-wave search. Phys. Rev. D, 105:043003, Feb 2022.
  84. A Novel Multi-Layer Modular Approach for Real-Time Gravitational-Wave Detection. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2206.06004, June 2022.
  85. Training strategies for deep learning gravitational-wave searches. Physical Review D, 105(4):043002, 2022.
  86. Convolutional neural network for gravitational-wave early alert: Going down in frequency. Phys. Rev. D, 106:042002, Aug 2022.
  87. DeepSNR: A deep learning foundation for offline gravitational wave detection. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2207.04749, July 2022.
  88. Can Convolution Neural Networks Be Used for Detection of Gravitational Waves from Precessing Black Hole Systems? arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2206.12673, June 2022.
  89. Identification of binary neutron star mergers in gravitational-wave data using object-detection machine learning models. Phys. Rev. D, 106(8):084059, October 2022.
  90. Searches for mass-asymmetric compact binary coalescence events using neural networks in the LIGO/Virgo third observation period. Phys. Rev. D, 107(8):082003, April 2023.
  91. Normalizing Flows as an Avenue to Studying Overlapping Gravitational Wave Signals. Phys. Rev. Lett., 130(17):171402, April 2023.
  92. Neural Importance Sampling for Rapid and Reliable Gravitational-Wave Inference. Phys. Rev. Lett., 130(17):171403, April 2023.
  93. An autoencoder neural network integrated into gravitational-wave burst searches to improve the rejection of noise transients. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 40(13):135008, July 2023.
  94. Physics-inspired spatiotemporal-graph AI ensemble for gravitational wave detection. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2306.15728, June 2023.
  95. Detecting and denoising gravitational wave signals from binary black holes using deep learning. Phys. Rev. D, 108(4):043024, August 2023.
  96. Denoising gravitational-wave signals from binary black holes with a dilated convolutional autoencoder. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 4(3):035024, September 2023.
  97. Rapid Mass Parameter Estimation of Binary Black Hole Coalescences Using Deep Learning. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2201.11126, January 2022.
  98. Deep learning detection and classification of gravitational waves from neutron star-black hole mergers. Physics Letters B, 840:137850, May 2023.
  99. Rapid identification of time-frequency domain gravitational wave signals from binary black holes using deep learning. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2305.19003, May 2023.
  100. Convolutional neural networks for the classification of glitches in gravitational-wave data streams. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 40(19):195018, October 2023.
  101. Comparison of neural network architectures for feature extraction from binary black hole merger waveforms. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2307.16668, July 2023.
  102. MLGWSC-1: The first Machine Learning Gravitational-Wave Search Mock Data Challenge. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2209.11146, September 2022.
  103. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778, 2016.
  104. Deep adaptive input normalization for price forecasting using limit order book data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2019.
  105. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, pages 8024–8035. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
  106. R. Abbott et al. Open Data from the Third Observing Run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO. Astrophys. J. Suppl., 267(2):29, 2023.
  107. The pycbc search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescence. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33(21):215004, 2016.
  108. Forecasting financial time series using robust deep adaptive input normalization. Journal of Signal Processing Systems, 93(10):1235–1251, 2021.
  109. Boris Hanin. Which neural net architectures give rise to exploding and vanishing gradients? Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018.
  110. Resnet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timm. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.00476, 2021.
  111. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, 2014.
  112. Method for detection and reconstruction of gravitational wave transients with networks of advanced detectors. Phys. Rev. D, 93:042004, Feb 2016.
  113. coherent waveburst, a pipeline for unmodeled gravitational-wave data analysis. SoftwareX, 14:100678, 06 2021.
  114. cwb pipeline library: 6.4.1, December 2021.
  115. gwastro/pycbc: v2.0.5 release of pycbc, July 2022.
  116. 4-OGC: Catalog of gravitational waves from compact-binary mergers. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2112.06878, December 2021.
  117. Search for binary black hole mergers in the third observing run of advanced ligo-virgo using coherent waveburst enhanced with machine learning. Phys. Rev. D, 105:083018, Apr 2022.
  118. Mapping neutron star data to the equation of state using the deep neural network. Phys. Rev. D, 101:054016, Mar 2020.
  119. Methodology study of machine learning for the neutron star equation of state. Phys. Rev. D, 98:023019, Jul 2018.
  120. Extensive studies of the neutron star equation of state from the deep learning inference with the observational data augmentation. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021(3), mar 2021.
  121. Unveiling the nuclear matter eos from neutron star properties: a supervised machine learning approach. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2021(07):011, jul 2021.
  122. Plamen G. Krastev. Translating neutron star observations to nuclear symmetry energy via deep neural networks. Galaxies, 10(1), 2022.
  123. F. Morawski and M. Bejger. Neural network reconstruction of the dense matter equation of state derived from the parameters of neutron stars. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 642(A78):8, oct 2020.
  124. Neural network reconstruction of the dense matter equation of state from neutron star observables. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2022(08):071, aug 2022.
  125. Reconstructing the neutron star equation of state from observational data via automatic differentiation. Physical Review D, 107(8), apr 2023.
  126. Cluster structures with machine learning support in neutron star m-r relations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2340(1):012014, sep 2022.
  127. Unsupervised machine learning correlations in eos of neutron stars, 2022.
  128. Extracting nuclear matter properties from the neutron star matter equation of state using deep neural networks. Physical Review D, 106(10), nov 2022.
  129. Plamen G. Krastev. A deep learning approach to extracting nuclear matter properties from neutron star observations, 2023.
  130. Scalarization. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2211.01766, November 2022.
  131. Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(24):243001, dec 2015.
  132. Astrophysical constraints on compact objects in 4d einstein-gauss-bonnet gravity. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2022(02):033, feb 2022.
  133. A Bayesian investigation of the neutron star equation-of-state vs. gravity degeneracy. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2309.05420, September 2023.
  134. Precision machine learning. Entropy, 25(1), 2023.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Authors (1)

  1. Nikolaos Stergioulas
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 1 like.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper:

Start a free 7-day Pro trial