Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 148 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 34 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 443 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Training Custom Light Curve Models of SN Ia Sub-Populations Selected According to Host Galaxy Properties (2401.07304v1)

Published 14 Jan 2024 in astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.GA, and astro-ph.HE

Abstract: Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) cosmology analyses include a luminosity step function in their distance standardization process to account for an observed yet unexplained difference in the post-standardization luminosities of SNe Ia originating from different host galaxy populations (e.g., high-mass ($M \gtrsim 10{10} M_{\odot}$) versus low-mass galaxies). We present a novel method for including host-mass correlations in the SALT3 light curve model used for standardising SN Ia distances. We split the SALT3 training sample according to host-mass, training independent models for the low- and high-host-mass samples. Our models indicate that there are different average Si II spectral feature strengths between the two populations, and that the average SED of SNe from low-mass galaxies is bluer than the high-mass counterpart. We then use our trained models to perform a SN cosmology analysis on the 3-year spectroscopically confirmed Dark Energy Survey SN sample, treating SNe from low- and high-mass host galaxies as separate populations throughout. We find that our mass-split models reduce the Hubble residual scatter in the sample, albeit at a low statistical significance. We do find a reduction in the mass-correlated luminosity step but conclude that this arises from the model-dependent re-definition of the fiducial SN absolute magnitude rather than the models themselves. Our results stress the importance of adopting a standard definition of the SN parameters ($x_0, x_1, c$) in order to extract the most value out of the light curve modelling tools that are currently available and to correctly interpret results that are fit with different models.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 2 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: