Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 133 tok/s
Gemini 3.0 Pro 55 tok/s Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash 164 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 202 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On the Power of Graph Neural Networks and Feature Augmentation Strategies to Classify Social Networks (2401.06048v1)

Published 11 Jan 2024 in cs.SI, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: This paper studies four Graph Neural Network architectures (GNNs) for a graph classification task on a synthetic dataset created using classic generative models of Network Science. Since the synthetic networks do not contain (node or edge) features, five different augmentation strategies (artificial feature types) are applied to nodes. All combinations of the 4 GNNs (GCN with Hierarchical and Global aggregation, GIN and GATv2) and the 5 feature types (constant 1, noise, degree, normalized degree and ID -- a vector of the number of cycles of various lengths) are studied and their performances compared as a function of the hidden dimension of artificial neural networks used in the GNNs. The generalisation ability of these models is also analysed using a second synthetic network dataset (containing networks of different sizes).Our results point towards the balanced importance of the computational power of the GNN architecture and the the information level provided by the artificial features. GNN architectures with higher computational power, like GIN and GATv2, perform well for most augmentation strategies. On the other hand, artificial features with higher information content, like ID or degree, not only consistently outperform other augmentation strategies, but can also help GNN architectures with lower computational power to achieve good performance.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)
  1. “Statistical mechanics of complex networks” In Reviews of modern physics 74.1 APS, 2002, pp. 47
  2. Shaked Brody, Uri Alon and Eran Yahav “How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?” In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022
  3. “Convolutional networks on graphs for learning molecular fingerprints” In Advances in neural information processing systems 28, 2015
  4. “On random graphs I” In Publ. math. debrecen 6.290-297, 1959, pp. 18
  5. “A Fair Comparison of Graph Neural Networks for Graph Classification” In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020
  6. “Graph u-nets” In international conference on machine learning, 2019, pp. 2083–2092 PMLR
  7. “Benchmarks for Graph Embedding Evaluation” In arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.06543, 2019
  8. “Ahp: Learning to negative sample for hyperedge prediction” In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2022, pp. 2237–2242
  9. Thomas N. Kipf and Max Welling “Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks” In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017
  10. Junhyun Lee, Inyeop Lee and Jaewoo Kang “Self-attention graph pooling” In International conference on machine learning, 2019, pp. 3734–3743 PMLR
  11. “Graph convolutional networks with eigenpooling” In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, 2019, pp. 723–731
  12. Mark EJ Newman and Duncan J Watts “Scaling and percolation in the small-world network model” In Physical review E 60.6 APS, 1999, pp. 7332
  13. “Graph Attention Networks” In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018
  14. “How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?” In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019
  15. “Identity-aware graph neural networks” In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence 35.12, 2021, pp. 10737–10745
  16. “An end-to-end deep learning architecture for graph classification” In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence 32.1, 2018
  17. “Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks” In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), 2018, pp. 286–301
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that integrating artificial features like node degree and identity vectors significantly improves classification performance across various GNN models.
  • It compares four distinct GNN architectures, with advanced models such as GIN and GATv2 showing robust results even without inherent node data.
  • The study highlights a trade-off between computational demand and feature richness, offering guidance for optimizing GNNs in practical network analysis.

Overview of Graph Neural Networks in Social Network Classification

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are instrumental in analyzing complex network structures, specifically in dealing with graph classification tasks. The research focuses on evaluating four different GNN architectures—GCN with Hierarchical and Global aggregation, GIN, and GATv2—across synthetic datasets designed to mimic classic network models without innate feature information. To compensate for the lack of inherent features within the nodes or edges of these networks, researchers have innovated by incorporating five different artificial feature augmentation strategies.

Augmentation Strategies and Their Impact

The artificial feature types developed for this paper include simple constants, random noise generation, node degree, normalized node degree, and a more complex identity vector that encapsulates cycles of various lengths associated with a node. These artificial features serve as a substitute for the actual node features that are not present in synthetic data. By experimenting with a combination of these feature types and GNN models, this research aims to probe the depths to which a GNN's computational capabilities can accurately classify graphs based on structure alone.

Comparative Performance Analysis

The paper illuminates the symbiotic relationship between the computational strength of a GNN and the level of information provided by the input features. Advanced GNNs like GIN and GATv2 showcase commendable performance across almost all feature types without much differentiation. However, the ID and degree features exhibit remarkable consistency in enhancing performance across all GNNs, further underscoring the value of richer information content. Importantly, while these more informative features inherently require more computation, the paper suggests that even less powerful GNNs can leverage them to attain respectable classification results.

Implications and Future Directions

In conclusion, the research signifies that the predictability of a GNN model on a classification task is not solely dependent on one factor, be it the neural network's architecture or the feature's informational depth. Both play integral roles in defining success. The findings are prelude to a larger discussion on the balance between computational demand and feature selection, which is pivotal in optimizing GNNs for real-world application. Future explorations are directed towards perfecting the hyperparameter optimization and applying these synthetic model-trained GNNs on real-world datasets for network classification, thereby extending the practical relevance of this paper to real social network analysis.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: