Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Data-Driven Estimation of Failure Probabilities in Correlated Structure-Preserving Stochastic Power System Models (2401.02555v1)

Published 4 Jan 2024 in cs.CE, cs.SY, eess.SY, math.DS, and stat.AP

Abstract: We propose a data-driven approach for propagating uncertainty in stochastic power grid simulations and apply it to the estimation of transmission line failure probabilities. A reduced-order equation governing the evolution of the observed line energy probability density function is derived from the Fokker--Planck equation of the full-order continuous Markov process. Our method consists of estimates produced by numerically integrating this reduced equation. Numerical experiments for scalar- and vector-valued energy functions are conducted using the classical multimachine model under spatiotemporally correlated noise perturbation. The method demonstrates a more sample-efficient approach for computing probabilities of tail events when compared with kernel density estimation. Moreover, it produces vastly more accurate estimates of joint event occurrence when compared with independent models.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. M. Adeen and F. Milano. Modeling of correlated stochastic processes for the transient stability analysis of power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36(5):4445–4456, 2021.
  2. Multimachine Systems with Constant Impedance Loads, pages 368–397. Number 3 in IEEE Press Series on Power and Energy Systems. IEEE, 2003.
  3. C. Brennan and D. Venturi. Data-driven closures for stochastic dynamical systems. Journal of Computational Physics, 372:281–298, nov 2018.
  4. Complex systems analysis of series of blackouts: Cascading failure, critical points, and self-organization. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 17(2), 06 2007. 026103.
  5. M. Frasca and L. V. Gambuzza. Control of cascading failures in dynamical models of power grids. Chaos, Solitons, Fractals, 153:111460, 2021.
  6. The Multidimensional Case, pages 355–389. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012.
  7. Unsupervised Learning, pages 485–585. Springer New York, New York, NY, 2009.
  8. Cascading power outages propagate locally in an influence graph that is not the actual grid topology. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32(2):958–967, 2017.
  9. Mutual information based bayesian analysis of power system reliability. In 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech, pages 1–6, 2015.
  10. P. E. Kloeden and E. Platen. Selected Applications of Strong Approximations, pages 427–456. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992.
  11. A. Lenzi and M. Anitescu. How can statistics help to prevent blackouts? Significance, 20(1):24–27, Feb. 2023.
  12. R. J. LeVeque. Variable-Coefficient Linear Equations, page 158–187. Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  13. Uncertainty propagation in power system dynamics with the method of moments. In 2018 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), pages 1–5, 2018.
  14. Nonlocal pdf methods for langevin equations with colored noise. Journal of Computational Physics, 367:87–101, 2018.
  15. Learning the evolution of correlated stochastic power system dynamics. In 2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), pages 01–05, 2022.
  16. Data-driven closures & assimilation for stiff multiscale random dynamics, 2023.
  17. F. Milano and R. Zárate-Miñano. A systematic method to model power systems as stochastic differential algebraic equations. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28(4):4537–4544, 2013.
  18. Temperature overloads in power grids under uncertainty: A large deviations approach. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 6(3):1161–1173, 2019.
  19. J. Owedyk and A. Kociszewski. On the Fokker-Planck equation with time-dependent drift and diffusion coefficients and its exponential solutions. Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter, 59(1):69–74, 1985.
  20. Nonintrusive uncertainty quantification of dynamic power systems subject to stochastic excitations. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36(1):402–414, 2021.
  21. H. Risken. Fokker-Planck Equation for Several Variables; Methods of Solution, pages 133–162. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1996.
  22. A kinetic monte carlo approach for simulating cascading transmission line failure, 2019.
  23. Feasibility of multivariate density estimates. Biometrika, 78(1):197–205, 1991.
  24. M. Studený and J. Vejnarová. The Multiinformation Function as a Tool for Measuring Stochastic Dependence, pages 261–297. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1998.
  25. Method of Distributions for Uncertainty Quantification, pages 1–22. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016.
  26. M. Wegkamp. Model selection in nonparametric regression. The Annals of Statistics, 31(1):252–273, 2003.
  27. Graph algorithms for preventing cascading failures in networks. In 2018 52nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS), pages 1–6, 2018.
  28. T. Zhang and W. B. Wu. Time-varying nonlinear regression models: Nonparametric estimation and model selection. The Annals of Statistics, 43(2), apr 2015.
  29. H. Zheng and C. L. DeMarco. A bi-stable branch model for energy-based cascading failure analysis in power systems. In North American Power Symposium 2010, pages 1–7, 2010.
  30. Quantitative analysis of information interaction in building energy systems based on mutual information. Energy, 214:118867, 2021.
  31. Matpower: Steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 26(1):12–19, 2011.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.