Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Offensive Alliances in Signed Graphs (2312.11960v1)

Published 19 Dec 2023 in cs.CC and math.CO

Abstract: Signed graphs have been introduced to enrich graph structures expressing relationships between persons or general social entities, introducing edge signs to reflect the nature of the relationship, e.g., friendship or enmity. Independently, offensive alliances have been defined and studied for undirected, unsigned graphs. We join both lines of research and define offensive alliances in signed graphs, hence considering the nature of relationships. Apart from some combinatorial results, mainly on k-balanced and k-anti-balanced signed graphs (where the latter is a newly introduced family of signed graphs), we focus on the algorithmic complexity of finding smallest offensive alliances, looking at a number of parameterizations. While the parameter solution size leads to an FPT result for unsigned graphs, we obtain W[2]-completeness for the signed setting. We introduce new parameters for signed graphs, e.g., distance to weakly balanced signed graphs, that could be of independent interest. We show that these parameters yield FPT results. Here, we make use of the recently introduced parameter neighborhood diversity for signed graphs.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. S. A. Amiri. A note on the fine-grained complexity of MIS on regular graphs. Information Processing Letters, 170:106123, 2021.
  2. Defensive alliances in signed networks. Technical report, Cornell Univ., 2023.
  3. Correlation clustering. Machine Learning, 56(1-3):89–113, 2004.
  4. D. Cartwright and F. Harary. Structural balance: a generalization of Heider’s theory. The Psychological Review, 63(5):277–293, 1956.
  5. D. Cattanéo and S. Perdrix. The parameterized complexity of domination-type problems and application to linear codes. In T. V. Gopal, M. Agrawal, A. Li, and S. B. Cooper, editors, Theory and Applications of Models of Computation, TAMC, volume 8402 of LNCS, pages 86–103. Springer, 2014.
  6. M. Chellali. Trees with equal global offensive k𝑘kitalic_k-alliance and k𝑘kitalic_k-domination numbers. Opuscula Mathematica, 30:249–254, 2010.
  7. Bounds on the global offensive k𝑘kitalic_k-alliance number in graphs. Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory, 29(3):597–613, 2009.
  8. On problems as hard as CNF-SAT. ACM Trans. Algorithms, 12(3):41:1–41:24, 2016.
  9. Parameterized Algorithms. Springer, 2015.
  10. J. A. Davis. Clustering and structural balance in graphs. Human Relations, 20:181–187, 1967.
  11. On defensive alliances and strong global offensive alliances. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 163, Part 2:136–141, 2014.
  12. Offensive alliances in graphs. Discussiones Mathematicae – Graph Theory, 24:263–275, 2002.
  13. H. Fernau and D. Raible. Alliances in graphs: a complexity-theoretic study. In J. van Leeuwen, G. F. Italiano, W. van der Hoek, C. Meinel, H. Sack, F. Plášil, and M. Bieliková, editors, SOFSEM 2007, Proceedings Vol. II, pages 61–70. Institute of Computer Science ASCR, Prague, 2007.
  14. Offensive r𝑟ritalic_r-alliances in graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 157:177–182, 2009.
  15. A. Gaikwad and S. Maity. On structural parameterizations of the offensive alliance problem. In D.-Z. Du, D. Du, C. Wu, and D. Xu, editors, Combinatorial Optimization and Applications - 15th International Conference, COCOA, volume 13135 of LNCS, pages 579–586. Springer, 2021.
  16. A. Gaikwad and S. Maity. Offensive alliances in graphs. Technical Report 2208.02992, Cornell University, ArXiv/CoRR, 2022.
  17. Parameterized complexity of defensive and offensive alliances in graphs. In D. Goswami and T. Anh Hoang, editors, Distributed Computing and Internet Technology - 17th International Conference, ICDCIT, volume 12582 of LNCS, pages 175–187. Springer, 2021.
  18. F. Harary. On the notion of balance of a signed graph. Michigan Mathematical Journal, 2:143–146, 1953–54.
  19. A. Harutyunyan. Global offensive alliances in graphs and random graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 164:522–526, 2014.
  20. A. Harutyunyan and S. Legay. Linear time algorithms for weighted offensive and powerful alliances in trees. Theoretical Computer Science, 582:17–26, 2015.
  21. Which problems have strongly exponential complexity? Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 63(4):512–530, 2001.
  22. D. S. Johnson and M. Szegedy. What are the least tractable instances of Max Independent Set? In R. E. Tarjan and T. J. Warnow, editors, Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA, pages 927–928. ACM/SIAM, 1999.
  23. Lower bounds based on the Exponential Time Hypothesis. EATCS Bulletin, 105:41–72, 2011.
  24. B. Mohar. Face cover and the genus problem for apex graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 82:102–117, 2001.
  25. Finding odd cycle transversals. Operations Research Letters, 32:299–301, 2004.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.