Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Conserved cosmological perturbations in USR inflation and bouncing scenarios

Published 3 Dec 2023 in astro-ph.CO | (2312.01425v2)

Abstract: Inflationary and bouncing scenarios are two frameworks that provide the mechanism to overcome the horizon problem as well as generate the primordial perturbations. In this work, we investigate the conservation of perturbations in single-field models of both inflationary and bouncing scenarios, where the quantity, $z = a \, \rm d \phi/{\rm d}\log a$, with $a$ representing the scale factor and $\phi$ denoting the scalar field, decreases with time. We observe that this behaviour occurs during the ultra-slow-roll phase in the context of inflation and the contracting phase in the context of bounce. We show that the conjugate momentum associated with the comoving curvature perturbation during both the ultra-slow-roll phase and the contracting phase of bouncing scenarios is conserved in the super-Hubble limit. We illustrate that, within the framework of inflation, this conservation of momentum allows for the evolution of perturbations across the ultra-slow-roll phase, enabling the calculation of the power spectrum for modes that exit the Hubble radius before the ultra-slow-roll phase begins. Similarly, in the context of a bounce, we can determine the power spectrum after the bounce using this method. We support our approach with both numerical and analytical arguments.

Authors (1)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 594, A20 (2016), arXiv:1502.02114 [astro-ph.CO] .
  2. Y. Akrami et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO] .
  3. V. F. Mukhanov, Sov. Phys. JETP 67, 1297 (1988), [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.94N7,1(1988)].
  4. S. Inoue and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Lett. B 524, 15 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0104083 .
  5. J. Garcia-Bellido and E. Ruiz Morales, Phys. Dark Univ. 18, 47 (2017), arXiv:1702.03901 [astro-ph.CO] .
  6. C. Germani and T. Prokopec, Phys. Dark Univ. 18, 6 (2017), arXiv:1706.04226 [astro-ph.CO] .
  7. G. Ballesteros and M. Taoso, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023501 (2018), arXiv:1709.05565 [hep-ph] .
  8. H. V. Ragavendra and L. Sriramkumar, Galaxies 11, 34 (2023), arXiv:2301.08887 [astro-ph.CO] .
  9. S. Choudhury and A. Mazumdar, Phys. Lett. B 733, 270 (2014), arXiv:1307.5119 [astro-ph.CO] .
  10. R. H. Brandenberger and J. Martin, Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 113001 (2013), arXiv:1211.6753 [astro-ph.CO] .
  11. R. Brandenberger and P. Peter, Found. Phys. 47, 797 (2017), arXiv:1603.05834 [hep-th] .
  12. D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D60, 023507 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9809062 [gr-qc] .
  13. O. Özsoy and G. Tasinato, JCAP 04, 048 (2020), arXiv:1912.01061 [astro-ph.CO] .
  14. R. N. Raveendran, Phys. Rev. D 99, 103517 (2019), arXiv:1902.06639 [gr-qc] .
  15. P. Peter and N. Pinto-Neto, Phys. Rev. D 66, 063509 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0203013 .
  16. L. E. Allen and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D70, 063515 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0404441 [astro-ph] .
  17. J. Martin and P. Peter, Phys. Rev. D 68, 103517 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0307077 .
  18. R. H. Brandenberger,   (2012), arXiv:1206.4196 [astro-ph.CO] .
Citations (3)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.