Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 171 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 60 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 437 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

LiDAR-based Outdoor Crowd Management for Smart Campus on the Edge (2311.18077v1)

Published 29 Nov 2023 in cs.CV

Abstract: Crowd management is crucial for a smart campus. Popular methods are camera-based. However, conventional camera-based approaches may leak users' personally identifiable features, jeopardizing user's privacy, which limits its application. In this work, we investigate using affordable light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology to perform outdoor crowd management leveraging edge computing. Specifically, we aim to count the number of people on a walkway of a university campus. Besides privacy protection, LiDAR sensors are superior to cameras since their performance will not be compromised when the campus is not well-illuminated. We deploy LiDAR sensors on light poles to collect data from the crowd on the campus and leverage edge accelerators to process data locally. We proposed two different methodologies in this work: 1) a non-convolutional neural network (CNN)-based approach, using clustering and autoencoder, and 2) a CNN-based approach that first projects point clouds to 2D planes and then processes the projection with conventional CNNs. Our first approach relies on careful feature engineering, whereas our second approach does not require such effort. However, the CNN-based approach requires more computational power than our non-CNN-based approach. We evaluate both approaches comprehensively with our hand-labeled real-life data collected from campus. Our evaluation results show that the first method achieves an accuracy of 85.4%, whereas the second method achieves 95.8%. Our CNN-based method outperforms existing solutions significantly. We also deploy our two models on an edge accelerator, TPU, to measure the speedup, leveraging this specialized accelerator.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.