Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Physics-informed neural network for acoustic resonance analysis in a one-dimensional acoustic tube (2310.11804v4)

Published 18 Oct 2023 in cs.SD and eess.AS

Abstract: This study devised a physics-informed neural network (PINN) framework to solve the wave equation for acoustic resonance analysis. The proposed analytical model, ResoNet, minimizes the loss function for periodic solutions and conventional PINN loss functions, thereby effectively using the function approximation capability of neural networks while performing resonance analysis. Additionally, it can be easily applied to inverse problems. The resonance in a one-dimensional acoustic tube, and the effectiveness of the proposed method was validated through the forward and inverse analyses of the wave equation with energy-loss terms. In the forward analysis, the applicability of PINN to the resonance problem was evaluated via comparison with the finite-difference method. The inverse analysis, which included identifying the energy loss term in the wave equation and design optimization of the acoustic tube, was performed with good accuracy.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (49)
  1. A. v. d. Oord, S. Dieleman, H. Zen, K. Simonyan, O. Vinyals, A. Graves, N. Kalchbrenner, A. Senior, and K. Kavukcuoglu, “Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio,” arXiv:1609.03499 (2016).
  2. I. Elias, H. Zen, J. Shen, Y. Zhang, Y. Jia, R. Skerry-Ryan, and Y. Wu, “Parallel Tacotron 2: A Non-Autoregressive Neural TTS Model with Differentiable Duration Modeling,” in Proc. Interspeech 2021 (2021), pp. 141–145.
  3. A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, “Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2012), Vol. 25.
  4. F. N. Iandola, S. Han, M. W. Moskewicz, K. Ashraf, W. J. Dally, and K. Keutzer, “Squeezenet: Alexnet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and¡ 0.5 mb model size,” arXiv:1602.07360 (2016).
  5. J. Ling, A. Kurzawski, and J. Templeton, “Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics 807, 155–166 (2016).
  6. R. Fang, D. Sondak, P. Protopapas, and S. Succi, “Neural network models for the anisotropic reynolds stress tensor in turbulent channel flow,” Journal of Turbulence 21(9-10), 525–543 (2020).
  7. K. Guo, Z. Yang, C.-H. Yu, and M. J. Buehler, “Artificial intelligence and machine learning in design of mechanical materials,” Materials Horizons 8(4), 1153–1172 (2021).
  8. D. Kochkov, J. A. Smith, A. Alieva, Q. Wang, M. P. Brenner, and S. Hoyer, “Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(21), e2101784118 (2021).
  9. B. Kim, V. C. Azevedo, N. Thuerey, T. Kim, M. Gross, and B. Solenthaler, “Deep fluids: A generative network for parameterized fluid simulations,” in Computer graphics forum (2019), Vol. 38, pp. 59–70.
  10. M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations,” Journal of Computational physics 378, 686–707 (2019).
  11. Z. Mao, A. D. Jagtap, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks for high-speed flows,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 360, 112789 (2020).
  12. A. D. Jagtap, Z. Mao, N. Adams, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flows,” Journal of Computational Physics 466, 111402 (2022).
  13. S. Cai, Z. Wang, S. Wang, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks for heat transfer problems,” Journal of Heat Transfer 143(6), 060801 (2021).
  14. B. Moseley, A. Markham, and T. Nissen-Meyer, “Solving the wave equation with physics-informed deep learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.11894 (2020).
  15. S. Alkhadhr, X. Liu, and M. Almekkawy, “Modeling of the forward wave propagation using physics-informed neural networks,” in 2021 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) (2021), pp. 1–4.
  16. H. Wang, J. Li, L. Wang, L. Liang, Z. Zeng, and Y. Liu, “On acoustic fields of complex scatters based on physics-informed neural networks,” Ultrasonics 128, 106872 (2023).
  17. S. Karimpouli and P. Tahmasebi, “Physics informed machine learning: Seismic wave equation,” Geoscience Frontiers 11(6), 1993–2001 (2020).
  18. M. Rasht-Behesht, C. Huber, K. Shukla, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks (pinns) for wave propagation and full waveform inversions,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 127(5), e2021JB023120 (2022).
  19. Y. Zhang, X. Zhu, and J. Gao, “Seismic inversion based on acoustic wave equations using physics-informed neural network,” IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 61, 1–11 (2023).
  20. M. Olivieri, M. Pezzoli, F. Antonacci, and A. Sarti, “A physics-informed neural network approach for nearfield acoustic holography,” Sensors 21(23), 7834 (2021).
  21. H. Kafri, M. Olivieri, F. Antonacci, M. Moradi, A. Sarti, and S. Gannot, “Grad-cam-inspired interpretation of nearfield acoustic holography using physics-informed explainable neural network,” in ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (2023), pp. 1–5.
  22. N. Borrel-Jensen, A. P. Engsig-Karup, and C.-H. Jeong, “Physics-informed neural networks for one-dimensional sound field predictions with parameterized sources and impedance boundaries,” JASA Express Letters 1(12) (2021).
  23. N. Borrel-Jensen, S. Goswami, A. P. Engsig-Karup, G. E. Karniadakis, and C.-H. Jeong, “Sound propagation in realistic interactive 3d scenes with parameterized sources using deep neural operators,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121(2) (2024).
  24. L. Lu, P. Jin, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Deeponet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operators,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03193 (2019).
  25. K. Ishizaka and J. L. Flanagan, “Synthesis of voiced sounds from a two-mass model of the vocal cords,” Bell system technical journal 51(6), 1233–1268 (1972).
  26. L. Cveticanin et al., “Review on mathematical and mechanical models of the vocal cord,” Journal of Applied Mathematics 2012 (2012).
  27. B. H. Story and I. R. Titze, “Voice simulation with a body-cover model of the vocal folds,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(2), 1249–1260 (1995).
  28. L. P. Fulcher and R. C. Scherer, “Recent measurements with a synthetic two-layer model of the vocal folds and extension of titze’s surface wave model to a body-cover model,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 146(6), EL502–EL508 (2019).
  29. S. Adachi and M.-a. Sato, “Time-domain simulation of sound production in the brass instrument,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(6), 3850–3861 (1995).
  30. J.-F. Petiot, R. Tournemenne, and J. Gilbert, “Physical modeling sound simulations for the study of the quality of wind instruments,” in ICSV2019-26th International Congress on Sound and Vibration (2019).
  31. E. Ducasse, “A physical model of a single-reed wind instrument including actions of the player,” Computer Music Journal 27(1), 59–70 (2003).
  32. V. Chatziioannou and M. van Walstijn, “Reed vibration modelling for woodwind instruments using a two-dimensional finite difference method approach,” in International Symposium on Musical Acoustics (2007).
  33. K. Yokota, S. Ishikawa, K. Takezaki, Y. Koba, and S. Kijimoto, “Numerical analysis and physical consideration of vocal fold vibration by modal analysis,” Journal of Sound and Vibration 514 (2021).
  34. M. Rothenberg, “A new inverse-filtering technique for deriving the glottal air flow waveform during voicing,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 53(6) (1973).
  35. J. Dang and K. Honda, “Estimation of vocal tract shapes from speech sounds with a physiological articulatory model,” Journal of Phonetics 30(3) (2002).
  36. K. Hornik, M. Stinchcombe, and H. White, “Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators,” Neural networks 2(5), 359–366 (1989).
  37. K. Yokota, S. Ishikawa, Y. Koba, S. Kijimoto, and S. Sugiki, “Inverse analysis of vocal sound source using an analytical model of the vocal tract,” Applied Acoustics 150, 89–103 (2019).
  38. T. Hélie, T. Hézard, R. Mignot, and D. Matignon, “One-dimensional acoustic models of horns and comparison with measurements,” Acta acustica united with Acustica 99(6), 960–974 (2013).
  39. L. Ziyin, T. Hartwig, and M. Ueda, “Neural networks fail to learn periodic functions and how to fix it,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33, 1583–1594 (2020).
  40. B. Kröse, B. Krose, P. van der Smagt, and P. Smagt, “An introduction to neural networks,” J Comput Sci 48 (1993).
  41. J. Schmidhuber, “Deep learning in neural networks: An overview,” Neural networks 61 (2015).
  42. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (2016).
  43. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).
  44. A. E. Rosenberg, “Effect of glottal pulse shape on the quality of natural vowels,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49(2B) (1971).
  45. R. Veldhuis, “A computationally efficient alternative for the liljencrants–fant model and its perceptual evaluation,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103(1) (1998).
  46. Z.-Q. J. Xu, Y. Zhang, T. Luo, Y. Xiao, and Z. Ma, “Frequency principle: Fourier analysis sheds light on deep neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.06523 (2019).
  47. M. Tancik, P. Srinivasan, B. Mildenhall, S. Fridovich-Keil, N. Raghavan, U. Singhal, R. Ramamoorthi, J. Barron, and R. Ng, “Fourier features let networks learn high frequency functions in low dimensional domains,” Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020).
  48. C. Song and Y. Wang, “Simulating seismic multifrequency wavefields with the fourier feature physics-informed neural network,” Geophysical Journal International 232(3) (2023).
  49. N. Benbarka, T. Höfer, A. Zell, et al., “Seeing implicit neural representations as fourier series,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (2022).
Citations (5)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up for Free